scholarly journals Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information

Cognition ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh M. Richard ◽  
Steven J. Luck ◽  
Andrew Hollingworth
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (30) ◽  
pp. eabf2218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Schweitzer ◽  
Martin Rolfs

Rapid eye movements (saccades) incessantly shift objects across the retina. To establish object correspondence, the visual system is thought to match surface features of objects across saccades. Here, we show that an object’s intrasaccadic retinal trace—a signal previously considered unavailable to visual processing—facilitates this match making. Human observers made saccades to a cued target in a circular stimulus array. Using high-speed visual projection, we swiftly rotated this array during the eyes’ flight, displaying continuous intrasaccadic target motion. Observers’ saccades landed between the target and a distractor, prompting secondary saccades. Independently of the availability of object features, which we controlled tightly, target motion increased the rate and reduced the latency of gaze-correcting saccades to the initial presaccadic target, in particular when the target’s stimulus features incidentally gave rise to efficient motion streaks. These results suggest that intrasaccadic visual information informs the establishment of object correspondence and jump-starts gaze correction.


Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Arizpe ◽  
Danielle L. Noles ◽  
Jack W. Tsao ◽  
Annie W.-Y. Chan

Facial recognition is widely thought to involve a holistic perceptual process, and optimal recognition performance can be rapidly achieved within two fixations. However, is facial identity encoding likewise holistic and rapid, and how do gaze dynamics during encoding relate to recognition? While having eye movements tracked, participants completed an encoding (“study”) phase and subsequent recognition (“test”) phase, each divided into blocks of one- or five-second stimulus presentation time conditions to distinguish the influences of experimental phase (encoding/recognition) and stimulus presentation time (short/long). Within the first two fixations, several differences between encoding and recognition were evident in the temporal and spatial dynamics of the eye-movements. Most importantly, in behavior, the long study phase presentation time alone caused improved recognition performance (i.e., longer time at recognition did not improve performance), revealing that encoding is not as rapid as recognition, since longer sequences of eye-movements are functionally required to achieve optimal encoding than to achieve optimal recognition. Together, these results are inconsistent with a scan path replay hypothesis. Rather, feature information seems to have been gradually integrated over many fixations during encoding, enabling recognition that could subsequently occur rapidly and holistically within a small number of fixations.


Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Jiang

Object correspondence is a fundamental problem in perception. Classic theories hold that the computation of correspondence is solely based on spatiotemporal information. Recent research showed that surface features also play an important role. However, the surface features of objects in many studies did not change throughout a trial. This study investigated the effect of feature change on object correspondence using the object-reviewing paradigm. Two moving objects underwent transient feature changes on color dimension (Experiment 1A) or a combination of three dimensions (Experiment 2A). Moreover, the objects moved behind four occluders to make the feature change nontransient (Experiments 1B and 2B). Object-specific preview benefits were reduced or eliminated when feature changes were transient, but the benefits were not affected when feature changes were nontransient. The effects of transient versus nontransient changes of surface feature in object correspondence are discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 2187-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela L. Gee ◽  
Anna E. Ipata ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg

We constantly make eye movements to bring objects of interest onto the fovea for more detailed processing. Activity in area V4, a prestriate visual area, is enhanced at the location corresponding to the target of an eye movement. However, the precise role of activity in V4 in relation to these saccades and the modulation of other cortical areas in the oculomotor system remains unknown. V4 could be a source of visual feature information used to select the eye movement, or alternatively, it could reflect the locus of spatial attention. To test these hypotheses, we trained monkeys on a visual search task in which they were free to move their eyes. We found that activity in area V4 reflected the direction of the upcoming saccade but did not predict the latency of the saccade in contrast to activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). We suggest that the signals in V4, unlike those in LIP, are not directly involved in the generation of the saccade itself but rather are more closely linked to visual perception and attention. Although V4 and LIP have different roles in spatial attention and preparing eye movements, they likely perform complimentary processes during visual search.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 519-519
Author(s):  
C. Tas ◽  
C. Moore ◽  
A. Hollingworth

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1061-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Rayner ◽  
Gretchen Kambe ◽  
Susan A. Duffy

2000 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Groner ◽  
Marina T. Groner ◽  
Kazuo Koga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document