Axis II comorbidity in borderline personality disorder is influenced by sex, age, and clinical severity

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Barrachina ◽  
Juan C. Pascual ◽  
Marc Ferrer ◽  
Joaquim Soler ◽  
M. Jesús Rufat ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 203 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Bateman ◽  
Peter Fonagy

BackgroundEvidence of remission from borderline personality disorder (BPD) without specialised treatment is accumulating.AimsTo establish whether specialised treatments are indicated for patients with clinically severe disorder.MethodThe impact of clinical severity on outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of mentalisation-based treatment (MBT) was contrasted with structured clinical management (SCM). Severity indicators were defined as severity of comorbid psychiatric syndromes, severity of BPD, severity of personality disturbance and severity of symptom distress. Logistic regressions were used to predict the likelihood of recovery at 18 months, and mixed-effects regression analysis was applied to examine the association of severity and rates of improvement across time in the two treatment groups.ResultsNone of the severity criteria predicted outcome at the end of treatment on logistic regression. However, testing the significance of distribution of cases of recovery v. non-recovery suggested that multiple Axis II diagnoses and symptom distress influenced outcomes.ConclusionsBorderline personality disorder with significant Axis II comorbidity is a possible but uncertain indicator for specialist treatment. Patients whose only personality disorder diagnosis is BPD do equally well with SCM. Prospective studies are needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne van Alebeek ◽  
Paul T. van der Heijden ◽  
Christel Hessels ◽  
Melissa S.Y. Thong ◽  
Marcel van Aken

Abstract. One of the most common personality disorders among adolescents and young adults is the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). The objective of current study was to assess three questionnaires that can reliably screen for BPD in adolescents and young adults (N = 53): the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD; Zanarini et al., 2003 ), the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire 4th edition – BPD scale (PDQ-4 BPD; Hyler, 1994 ), and the SCID-II Patient Questionnaire – BPD scale (SCID-II-PQ BPD). The nine criteria of BPD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV; APA, 1994 ) were measured with the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders – BPD scale (SCID-II; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, Williams, & Benjamin, 1995 ). Correlations between the questionnaires and the SCID-II were calculated. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were tested. All instruments predicted the BPD diagnosis equally well.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Critchfield ◽  
John F. Clarkin ◽  
Kenneth N. Levy ◽  
Otto F. Kernberg

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Zanarini ◽  
Leah K. Barison ◽  
Frances R. Frankenburg ◽  
D. Bradford Reich ◽  
James I. Hudson

Author(s):  
Stefano Carrera ◽  
Guia Pandolfi ◽  
Jee Yun Cappelletti ◽  
Walter Padoani ◽  
Silvia Salcuni

This contribution presents two brief reports about preliminary results of 18 months of oriented Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT), with Borderline Personality Disorder patients, recruited at the Camposampiero Mental Health Center. Following in large part Bateman and Fonagy guidelines for MBT in institutional settings, this paper presents preliminary results in two brief reports related to two cohorts of patient underwent to the oriented MBT in Camposampiero Mental Health Center (MHC). In the first study, we analyzed a group of 9 patients: an anamnestic schedule was administered; then, symptoms (SCL-90-R), psychodiagnostic scale and global health functioning (Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorder [SCID-II], Global Assessment of Functioning, [GAF]), data on service impact and service costs (Cassel Community Adjustment Questionnaire, Patient Evaluation Schedule and folder data) were provided at the beginning (T0), at the end of the treatment (T2) and 1 year after the end of the MBT project. The second study showed a micro-analytical change on a second patient cohort (n=6) at T0, 3, 6 and 9 months (T1) were presented considering specifically mentalization (Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale, Modes of Mentalization Scale, Mentalization Imbalances Scale) and patienttherapist session evaluation trends (Session Evaluation Questionnaire) and patient reflective functioning at T0 and T2 (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire). Aims and hypotheses of the two studies pointed out how the oriented MBT bring to an improvement of the overall functioning of the patients, a reduction of the symptoms, a decrease of the diagnostic criteria for the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and the other Axis II disorders, a reduction of the workload hours for the MHC staff and of the costs of the assistance. The analyses of both the studies were carried out using non-parametric statistics (Friedman test, Spearman correlation, Chi-square). Preliminary results confirmed the improvement in the overall functioning of patients (GAF), the reduction in BPD-related symptoms and in diagnostic criteria for BPD (SCID-II), the improvement of patients’ mentalization skills, and a significant reduction in workload for health staff. Standing the limits and the preliminary results, the two brief reports demonstrate the feasibility of an oriented MBT within an Italian Public Service and the effectiveness of this treatment pathway for patients with BPD, leaving some open questions to stimulate a fruitful clinical discussion.


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Pantoularis ◽  
George Garyfallos ◽  
Martha Lobtzianidou ◽  
Aristidis Livanos ◽  
Ioannis Dasoukis ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Plante ◽  
Mary C. Zanarini ◽  
Frances R. Frankenburg ◽  
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice

2017 ◽  
Vol 252 ◽  
pp. 134-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Zanarini ◽  
Christina M. Temes ◽  
Alexandra M. Ivey ◽  
Danielle M. Cohn ◽  
Lindsey C. Conkey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document