Recent advances in the reconstruction of metabolic models and integration of omics data

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajib Saha ◽  
Anupam Chowdhury ◽  
Costas D Maranas
Author(s):  
Louise Deconinck ◽  
Robrecht Cannoodt ◽  
Wouter Saelens ◽  
Bart Deplancke ◽  
Yvan Saeys

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Yong Kim ◽  
Seung Bum Sohn ◽  
Yu Bin Kim ◽  
Won Jun Kim ◽  
Sang Yup Lee

Author(s):  
Andrew Walakira ◽  
Damjana Rozman ◽  
Tadeja Režen ◽  
Miha Mraz ◽  
Miha Moškon

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Ponce-de-León ◽  
Iñigo Apaolaza ◽  
Alfonso Valencia ◽  
Francisco J. Planes

ABSTRACTWith the publication of high-quality genome-scale metabolic models for several organisms, the Systems Biology community has developed a number of algorithms for their analysis making use of ever growing –omics data. In particular, the reconstruction of the first genome-scale human metabolic model, Recon1, promoted the development of Context-Specific Model (CS-Model) reconstruction methods. This family of algorithms aims to identify the set of metabolic reactions that are active in a cell in a given condition using omics data, such as gene expression levels. Different CS-Model reconstruction algorithms have their own strengths and weaknesses depending on the problem under study and omics data available. However, after careful inspection, we found that all of these algorithms share common issues in the way GPR rules and gene expression data are treated. The first issue is related with how gapfilling reactions are managed after the reconstruction is conducted. The second issue concerns the molecular context, which is used to build the CS-model but neglected for posterior analyses. To evaluate the effect of these issues, we reconstructed ∼400 CS-Models of cancer cell lines and conducted gene essentiality analysis, using CRISPR–Cas9 essentiality data for validation purposes. Altogether, our results illustrate the importance of correcting the errors introduced during the GPR translation in many of the published metabolic reconstructions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (624) ◽  
pp. eaaz1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Robinson ◽  
Pınar Kocabaş ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Pierre-Etienne Cholley ◽  
Daniel Cook ◽  
...  

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are valuable tools to study metabolism and provide a scaffold for the integrative analysis of omics data. Researchers have developed increasingly comprehensive human GEMs, but the disconnect among different model sources and versions impedes further progress. We therefore integrated and extensively curated the most recent human metabolic models to construct a consensus GEM, Human1. We demonstrated the versatility of Human1 through the generation and analysis of cell- and tissue-specific models using transcriptomic, proteomic, and kinetic data. We also present an accompanying web portal, Metabolic Atlas (https://www.metabolicatlas.org/), which facilitates further exploration and visualization of Human1 content. Human1 was created using a version-controlled, open-source model development framework to enable community-driven curation and refinement. This framework allows Human1 to be an evolving shared resource for future studies of human health and disease.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Yong Ryu ◽  
Hyun Uk Kim ◽  
Sang Yup Lee

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (19) ◽  
pp. 2393-2404
Author(s):  
Xueliang Wang ◽  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Tingyi Wen

Metabolites ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 749
Author(s):  
Wolfram Liebermeister ◽  
Elad Noor

Enzyme kinetic constants in vivo are largely unknown, which limits the construction of large metabolic models. Given measured metabolic fluxes, metabolite concentrations, and enzyme concentrations, these constants may be inferred by model fitting, but the estimation problems are hard to solve if models are large. Here we show how consistent kinetic constants, metabolite concentrations, and enzyme concentrations can be determined from data if metabolic fluxes are known. The estimation method, called model balancing, can handle models with a wide range of rate laws and accounts for thermodynamic constraints between fluxes, kinetic constants, and metabolite concentrations. It can be used to estimate in-vivo kinetic constants, to complete and adjust available data, and to construct plausible metabolic states with predefined flux distributions. By omitting one term from the log posterior—a term for penalising low enzyme concentrations—we obtain a convex optimality problem with a unique local optimum. As a demonstrative case, we balance a model of E. coli central metabolism with artificial or experimental data and obtain a physically and biologically plausible parameterisation of reaction kinetics in E. coli central metabolism. The example shows what information about kinetic constants can be obtained from omics data and reveals practical limits to estimating in-vivo kinetic constants. While noise-free omics data allow for a reasonable reconstruction of in-vivo kcat and KM values, prediction from noisy omics data are worse. Hence, adjusting kinetic constants and omics data to obtain consistent metabolic models is the main application of model balancing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document