Eye dominance influences triggering action: The Poffenberger paradigm revisited

Cortex ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 86-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Chaumillon ◽  
Jean Blouin ◽  
Alain Guillaume
Keyword(s):  
Poffenberger Paradigm ◽  
Eye Dominance

Does Dyslexia Develop from Left-Eye Dominance?

2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-601
Author(s):  
David S. Mather ◽  
Todd M. Milford ◽  
Lona M. McRae
Keyword(s):  
Eye Dominance

Mandibular deviations in TMD and non-TMD groups related to eye dominance and head posture

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Pradham ◽  
G. White ◽  
N. Mehta ◽  
A. Forgione
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Lateral Direction ◽  
Head Posture ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Pain Center ◽  
And Control ◽  
Female Subjects

This study was designed to determine whether eye-dominance affects head posture (rotation) and in turn, whether head posture is associated with mandibular frenum midline deviation, in both TMJ and control subjects. Eye dominance was determined using three tests:Porta, Hole, Point tests. Natural head posture was evaluated using the Arthrodial protractor. Mandibular frenum deviation was recorded as left, right or no deviation. Fifty female subjects were included in the study, 25 TMJ patients attending the Gelb Craniomandibular Pain Center and 25 non-TMJ control subjects. The findings indicate that eye dominance and direction of head rotation are strongly associated in both TMJ and control subjects. Further, in TMJ subjects mandibular deviation occurred in greater frequency than in controls and tends to occur in the contra lateral direction of head rotation.

Eye-dominance, Writing Hand, and Throwing Hand

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.C. McManus
Keyword(s):  
Eye Dominance

An Eye Dominance Gage and Some of its Uses

1942 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. T. Diehl
Keyword(s):  
Eye Dominance

scholarly journals A comparison of tests for quantifying sensory eye dominance

2018 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 60-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Bossi ◽  
Lisa M. Hamm ◽  
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor ◽  
Steven C. Dakin
Keyword(s):  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Comparison Of Tests ◽  
Sensory Eye Dominance

scholarly journals Neural correlates of the eye dominance effect in human face perception: the left-visual-field superiority for faces revisited

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1342-1350
Author(s):  
Wookyoung Jung ◽  
Joong-Gu Kang ◽  
Hyeonjin Jeon ◽  
Miseon Shim ◽  
Ji Sun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Face Perception ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Dominance Effect ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Human Face ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Visual Field Superiority

Eye Dominance

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Uma Suryadevara ◽  
Adam J. Woods
Keyword(s):  
Eye Dominance

scholarly journals Sensory eye dominance varies within the visual field

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Dieter ◽  
Randolph Blake
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Sensory Eye Dominance

scholarly journals The "pull" in the push-pull perceptual learning protocol to reduce sensory eye dominance underscores the role of interocular inhibition

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 705-705
Author(s):  
T. L. Ooi ◽  
J. Xu ◽  
Z. He
Keyword(s):  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Sensory Eye Dominance

scholarly journals Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Valuch ◽  
Louisa Kulke
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Binocular Rivalry ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Cognitive Skills ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Contextual Information ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Eye Dominance ◽  
Adult Participants

Integration of prior experience and contextual information can help to resolve perceptually ambiguous situations and might support the ability to understand other peoples’ thoughts and intentions, called Theory of Mind. We studied whether the readiness to incorporate contextual information for resolving binocular rivalry is positively associated with Theory-of-Mind-related social cognitive abilities. In children (12 to 13 years) and adults (18 to 25 years), a predictive temporal context reliably modulated the onset of binocular rivalry to a similar degree. In contrast, adult participants scored better on measures of Theory of Mind compared to children. We observed considerable interindividual differences regarding the influence of a predictive context on binocular rivalry, which were associated with differences in sensory eye dominance. The absence of a positive association between predictive effects on perception and Theory of Mind performance suggests that predictive effects on binocular rivalry and higher-level Theory-of-Mind-related abilities stem from different neurocognitive mechanisms. We conclude that the influence of predictive contextual information on basic visual processes is fully developed at an earlier age, whereas social cognitive skills continue to evolve from adolescence to adulthood.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document