Twitter spam detection: Survey of new approaches and comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 265-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingmin Wu ◽  
Sheng Wen ◽  
Yang Xiang ◽  
Wanlei Zhou
2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (18) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Chirag Nathwani ◽  
Viralkumar Prajapati ◽  
Deven Agravat

Author(s):  
Lieselotte Anderwald

This chapter summarizes new approaches to the study of traditional dialects, in particular in Britain and the United States, and discusses how new methods, new results, and new topics of investigation may inform and enrich the study of World Englishes, too. Of particular importance may be the acknowledgement of widespread variability in the ‘homeland’ that is increasingly also historically attested and sociolinguistically described, the study of morphosyntactic variation as an area of language that seems to remain quite stable under settlement conditions, and the comparative study of present-day variability that indicates the breadth (and limits) of variability. In return, results from the comparative study of World Englishes also have the potential to enrich modern dialectology and sociolinguistics.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noemi Carmona ◽  
Katrin Wittstadt ◽  
Hannelore Römich

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ensiyeh Ghavampour ◽  
Brenda Vale

The literature on sustainability policies and placemaking strategies reveals the inadequacy of both concepts to address current urban issues suggesting the need for new approaches. Sustainability researchers and policy makers are seeking an integrated approach to sustainability within which placemaking is a powerful tool in achieving sustainability goals. However, despite this rising awareness of place and its value, there is growing concern that the value of place and its urban meaning is declining. Placemaking appears to have changed from being an authentic everyday practice to a professional responsibility, and the understanding of the intangible character of place is mainly lost in the modern making of places. The emphasis of designers on physical design attributes assumes a fragile model of causality, underestimating the other necessary components for placemaking—behaviour and meaning. Comparing models of sustainability and place, this article suggests that there is need for a shift from the current model of placemaking towards a strong model of progress and balance in creating quality places. The article also describes the implications of the new model for design practice and how it could be used with the goal of achieving both placemaking and sustainability visions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document