scholarly journals Optimal attentional focus during exposure in specific phobia: A meta-analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1172-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana R. Podină ◽  
Ernst H.W. Koster ◽  
Pierre Philippot ◽  
Vincent Dethier ◽  
Daniel O. David
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Wininger ◽  
Patty Bamonti ◽  
Rebecca Bridges ◽  
Sarah Pociask ◽  
Diana Gieske

2021 ◽  
pp. 100462
Author(s):  
Sonia Mor ◽  
Jorge Grimaldos ◽  
Cintia Tur ◽  
Clara Miguel ◽  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Ipser ◽  
Leesha Singh ◽  
Dan J. Stein

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M.H.H. Van Houtem ◽  
M.L. Laine ◽  
D.I. Boomsma ◽  
L. Ligthart ◽  
A.J. van Wijk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jozo Grgic ◽  
Pavle Mikulic

Several studies explored the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise, but their analysed outcomes most commonly involved surface electromyography variables. Therefore, the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise performance remain unclear. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis examining the acute effects of external focus vs. internal focus vs. control on muscular endurance. Five databases were searched to find relevant studies. The data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. In the analysis for external vs. internal focus of attention, there were seven comparisons with 14 study groups. In the analyses for external focus vs. control and internal focus vs. control, there were six comparisons with 12 study groups. An external focus of attention enhanced muscular endurance when compared with an internal focus (Cohen’s d: 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34 and 0.82) and control (Cohen’s d: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.08 and 0.76). In the analysis for internal focus vs. control, there was no significant difference between the conditions (Cohen’s d: –0.19; 95% CI: –0.45 and 0.07). Generally, these results remained consistent in the subgroup analyses for upper-body vs. lower-body exercises. From a practical perspective, the results presented in this review suggest that individuals should use an external focus of attention for acute enhancement of muscular endurance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Calatayud ◽  
Jonas Vinstrup ◽  
Markus D. Jakobsen ◽  
Emil Sundstrup ◽  
Juan Carlos Colado ◽  
...  

This study evaluated the influence of different attentional foci for varied grip widths in the bench press. Eighteen resistance-trained men were familiarized with the procedure and performed a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test during Session 1. In Session 2, they used three different standardized grip widths (100%, 150%, and 200% of biacromial width distance) in random order at 50% of 1RM while also engaged in three different attention focus conditions (external focus on the bench press, internal focus on pectoralis major muscles, and internal focus on triceps brachii muscles). Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the triceps brachii and pectoralis major, and peak EMG of the filtered signals were normalized to maximum EMG of each muscle. Both grip width and focus influenced the muscle activity level, but there were no significant interactions between these variables. Exploratory analyses suggested that an internal focus may slightly (4%–6%) increase pectoralis major activity at wider grip widths and triceps brachii activity at narrower grip widths, but this should be confirmed or rejected in a study with a larger sample size or through a meta-analysis of research to date.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document