Alumni survey of a combined doctor of pharmacy/graduate certificate in aging studies program

Author(s):  
Sarah Rahim ◽  
Tracey Gendron ◽  
Patricia W. Slattum ◽  
Krista L. Donohoe
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S665-S665
Author(s):  
Catherine J Tompkins ◽  
Emily S Ihara ◽  
Katelyn Bittinger

Abstract Each day, 10,000 Americans celebrate a 65th birthday, but there are still many young adults not choosing to enter a field that focuses on working with the older population. As part of a continued effort to understand low enrollments in a minor in aging studies and a graduate certificate program in gerontology, focus groups were held with students to explore why they are not choosing to learn more about one of the fastest growing sectors of the U.S. population. A total of 21 students participated in two focus groups. Students’ majors varied but included social work, public health, nursing and communications. All of the students were between the ages of 18 and 22 except for one student who was 68 years old. Only 6 students had taken an aging class, but every student indicated that they were close to a family member, 60 years old or older. Two researchers coded and analyzed the focus group data for themes. Examples of the themes about older adults included being unwilling to change, having negative views toward millennials, and being hampered by technology. Themes relative to student perspectives included needing empathy and patience to work with older adults, assuming decline and lacking opportunities within their majors to take gerontology courses. Comparing views and perspectives of older adults decades ago by traditional college-aged students to current day perspectives resulting from this data will be discussed as well as successful strategies for increasing enrollments in gerontology programs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Walker ◽  
Maureen Blankemeyer
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenda Y. Nogami ◽  
Julie Colestock ◽  
Terry A. Phoenix ◽  
Robert C. White ◽  
Jr
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric H. Hobson ◽  
Nancy M. Waite ◽  
Laurie L. Briceland

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Theobald ◽  
Fiona Maree Coyer ◽  
Amanda Jane Henderson ◽  
Robyn Fox ◽  
Bernadette F. Thomson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hospital and university service providers invest significant but separate resources into preparing registered nurses to work in the emergency department setting. This results in the duplication of both curricula and resource investment in the health and higher education sectors. This paper describes an evidence-based co-designed study with clinical-academic stakeholders from hospital and university settings. Methods The study was informed by evidence-based co-design, using emergency nursing as an exemplar. Eighteen hours of co-design workshops were completed with 21 key clinical-academic stakeholders from hospital and university settings. Results Outcomes were matrices synchronising professional and regulatory imperatives of postgraduate nursing coursework; mutually-shaped curriculum content, teaching approaches and assessment strategies relevant for postgraduate education; a new University-Industry Academic Integration Framework; five agreed guiding principles of postgraduate curriculum development for university-industry curriculum co-design; and a Graduate Certificate of Emergency Nursing curriculum exemplar. Conclusion Industry-academic service provider co-design can increase the relevance of postgraduate specialist courses in nursing, strengthening the nexus between both entities to advance learning and employability. The study developed strategies and exemplars for future use in any mutually determined academic-industry education partnership.


Author(s):  
Michael A. Biddle ◽  
Andrew Hibbard ◽  
Shanna O'Connor ◽  
Thomas G. Wadsworth ◽  
Renee Robinson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 604-604
Author(s):  
Sara Police ◽  
Jessie Hoffman,

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this project was to design, develop and implement an online two-credit course, Drug & Nutrient Interactions, as an elective for a new online Graduate Certificate in Applied Nutrition and Culinary Medicine at the University of Kentucky. Methods Drug & Nutrient Interactions was designed to meet the needs of select student cohorts: undergraduate Pharmacology minors, graduate students enrolled in the Masters in Nutritional Sciences program, and online graduate certificate students. Faculty within the Dept. of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences and the Division of Clinical Nutrition were consulted to identify curricular gaps and to avoid redundancy across programs. Instructional designers were consulted to identify evidence-based best practices in online course design and teaching. Results Content of the Drug and Nutrient Interactions course is structured within four thematic modules: 1. Introduction to Pharmacology and Food & Drug Interactions, 2. Exploring Drug-Nutrient Interactions, 3. Genes, Bugs & Time, and 4. Current and Future Directions in Nutrition & Pharmacology. Each module is three to four weeks in duration, to span a 14-week semester. Each week, students’ tasks include reading, watching, writing, and reviewing content related to the student learning objectives. Methods to promote student engagement with the content recur week-to-week, to ensure consistency for students’ experience. An eBook was written by the instructors to provide a current and interdisciplinary review of the intersections of nutritional sciences and pharmacology in the course. In lieu of proctored online exams, module-level assignments assess students’ achievement of learning outcomes. Drug & Nutrient Interactions launched in fall 2019 with nine students enrolling and completing the course. Course analytics track student engagement by logging page views and participation. Increasing students’ page views and participation align with due dates for module assignments. Therefore - in spring 2020, deadlines were shifted to a weekly timeline to foster consistent engagement. Conclusions Instructors should explore various methods to foster student-content, student-student and student-instructor engagement in an online learning environment. Funding Sources This course project was funded by a UK Online award & an Alternative Textbook grant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document