scholarly journals Bridging Disciplines with a New and Interactive Online Course: Drug & Nutrient Interactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 604-604
Author(s):  
Sara Police ◽  
Jessie Hoffman,
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Due Dates ◽  
Nutrient Interactions ◽  
University Of Kentucky ◽  
Student Cohorts ◽  
Graduate Certificate ◽  
Nutritional Sciences

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this project was to design, develop and implement an online two-credit course, Drug & Nutrient Interactions, as an elective for a new online Graduate Certificate in Applied Nutrition and Culinary Medicine at the University of Kentucky. Methods Drug & Nutrient Interactions was designed to meet the needs of select student cohorts: undergraduate Pharmacology minors, graduate students enrolled in the Masters in Nutritional Sciences program, and online graduate certificate students. Faculty within the Dept. of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences and the Division of Clinical Nutrition were consulted to identify curricular gaps and to avoid redundancy across programs. Instructional designers were consulted to identify evidence-based best practices in online course design and teaching. Results Content of the Drug and Nutrient Interactions course is structured within four thematic modules: 1. Introduction to Pharmacology and Food & Drug Interactions, 2. Exploring Drug-Nutrient Interactions, 3. Genes, Bugs & Time, and 4. Current and Future Directions in Nutrition & Pharmacology. Each module is three to four weeks in duration, to span a 14-week semester. Each week, students’ tasks include reading, watching, writing, and reviewing content related to the student learning objectives. Methods to promote student engagement with the content recur week-to-week, to ensure consistency for students’ experience. An eBook was written by the instructors to provide a current and interdisciplinary review of the intersections of nutritional sciences and pharmacology in the course. In lieu of proctored online exams, module-level assignments assess students’ achievement of learning outcomes. Drug & Nutrient Interactions launched in fall 2019 with nine students enrolling and completing the course. Course analytics track student engagement by logging page views and participation. Increasing students’ page views and participation align with due dates for module assignments. Therefore - in spring 2020, deadlines were shifted to a weekly timeline to foster consistent engagement. Conclusions Instructors should explore various methods to foster student-content, student-student and student-instructor engagement in an online learning environment. Funding Sources This course project was funded by a UK Online award & an Alternative Textbook grant.

scholarly journals A Multimedia-Rich Platform to Enhance Student Engagement and Learning in an Online Environment

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Scott Bledsoe
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Student Feedback ◽  
Effective Practices ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Online Environment ◽  
Important Research ◽  
Psychology Class

Utilizing multimedia tools such as videos and audio clips can be an effective way to promote student learning and engagement in online settings. This study explores the implementation of a photo-rich comprehensive counseling center environment through which students of a semester-long online graduate psychology class learned about important research methodology concepts. Student feedback is provided along with implications for student learning in future online course endeavors. This multimedia course design was the recipient of the 2013 Sloan-C Effective Practices Award.

A Knowledge-Based Risk-Driven Model Supporting Collaborative Online Course Creation

2021 ◽  
pp. 142-162
Author(s):  
Sharon Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Mental Models ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Knowledge Capture ◽  
Online Course Design ◽  
Online Instructors ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Successful Design

This chapter presents a visible, explicit, and reusable risk-driven knowledge capture model that defines a process for supporting collaborative online course creation. The model defines the structure and use of a knowledge base of risks and heuristics for risk mitigation specific to transitioning courses to online. The instantiation of the model with known risks and heuristics is the end result of collaboration that takes place among a community of practitioners which includes experienced online instructors, instructional designers, and subject experts. Experienced practitioners hold within their established mental models of instructional design the theory behind such design. This theory consists of the knowledge behind decisions affecting success or difficulty and heuristics established regarding online course design. Without explicit capture of this knowledge, theories expressing mental models of successful design are lost when expert practitioners leave an organization. This presented model defines a structure and method for the capture and reuse of this knowledge.

scholarly journals How to measure student engagement in the context of blended-MOOC

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadiyah Almutairi ◽  
Su White
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Single Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Massive Open Online Course ◽  
High Quality Education ◽  
Blended Course

PurposeThis paper aims to develop a model of measuring student engagement in a blended-massive open online course (MOOC) context. MOOCs are those that are delivered, usually by leading universities, with a promise to provide free high-quality education to an unlimited number of learners. They offer an opportunity for “blended” course design, where instructors can integrate MOOC content within face-to-face educational activities and components.Design/methodology/approachThree internationally recognized existing frameworks, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), UK Engagement Survey (UKES) and Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ), were combined into a single model. The model was confirmed by a panel of 35 expert practitioners. A trial evaluation using the model was carried out on 13 students who had participated in a course that had adopted a blended-MOOC format.FindingsThe confirmed model has nine indicators which provide information about distinct aspects of student engagement.Originality/valueIt is considered to be the first model designed to measure student engagement within the blended-MOOC context.

scholarly journals Design Matters: Development and Validation of the Online Course Design Elements (OCDE) Instrument

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-71
Author(s):  
Florence Martin ◽  
Doris U. Bolliger ◽  
Claudia Flowers
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Online Course Design ◽  
Online Instructors ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Development And Validation

Course design is critical to online student engagement and retention. This study focused on the development and validation of an online course design elements (OCDE) instrument with 38 Likert-type scale items in five subscales: (a) overview, (b) content presentation, (c) interaction and communication, (d) assessment and evaluation, and (e) learner support. The validation process included implementation with 222 online instructors and instructional designers in higher education. Three models were evaluated which included a one-factor model, five-factor model, and higher-order model. The five-factor and higher-order models aligned with the development of the OCDE. The frequency of use of OCDE items was rated above the mean 4.0 except for two items on collaboration and self-assessment. The overall OCDE score was related to self-reported levels of expertise but not with years of experience. The findings have implications for the use of this instrument with online instructors and instructional designers in the design of online courses.

Managing Quality in Online Education

2013 ◽  
pp. 220-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa L. Coffman ◽  
Mary Beth Klinger
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Online Education ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Quality Matters ◽  
Course Success ◽  
Online Course Development ◽  
Management Approaches

Online education is advancing the world over and recent emphasis has focused on the quality of online learning and student outcomes. This chapter focuses on managing quality in online learning design through two different project management approaches at two different institutions of higher education. University X instituted a pilot program of faculty and instructional designers to initiate online course development at this University and to identify and define quality in the online course design process. College Y has had a successful online cadre of courses and programs and recently adopted a for-purchase quality initiative through Quality Matters. Courses are put through the Quality Matters evaluation process to determine strengths and weaknesses. Both institutions will continue to offer online education as an alternative to traditional, classroom courses and both will continue to monitor quality as a key indicator of student learning and online course success.

scholarly journals Quality of Online Courses

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Sharif
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers

Instructional designers strive to create quality online courses by using different methods and strategies; however, they rarely find the time to reflect on their work and evaluate their final course design. There are three main challenges that instructional designers face while developing online course. First, instructional designers have ambiguity around their roles, and their skills and expertise are often not used as they fulfill their responsibilities.

scholarly journals An Online Training Course to Learn How to Teach Online | Former en ligne pour apprendre à former en ligne

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylviane Bachy ◽  
Marcel Lebrun
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Online Course ◽  
First Year ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
Ongoing Training ◽  
French Speaking ◽  
Second Year

This case study deals with the implementation of ongoing training, offered wholly through distance and online learning, and conducted within the framework of an inter-university partnership linking two European countries. The case story relates the experience of several instructional designers (called Academic Advisors in this part of French-speaking Europe) who were in charge of designing, developing, and implementing an online course as well as conducting follow-up assessment on the skills acquired. The project occurred over a period of two years, from the initial course design during the first year to its implementation during the second year. During the design phase, a number of issues arose with regard to the didactic method used, institutional isomorphism, and the digital platforms operating in the two universities. Hindrances and facilitating factors encountered in the second year, during the trainees’ tutorship and guidance, are also analysed.

Authentic Learning in Online Courses

2012 ◽  
pp. 82-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deb Gearhart
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Real World ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Authentic Learning ◽  
Learning By Doing ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Online Course Design ◽  
Design Students

The purpose of this chapter is to describe authentic learning, review the literature pertaining to authentic learning, discuss the benefits for online learning, and provide a model for the use of authentic learning in online course design. Students comment they are motivated by solving real-world problems and often express a preference for doing rather than listening. At the same time, most educators consider learning by doing the most effective way to teach (Lombardi, 2007). The chapter will be beneficial to instructors and instructional designers alike.

Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design

2021 ◽  
pp. 146978742199084
Author(s):  
Eseta Tualaulelei ◽  
Katie Burke ◽  
Melissa Fanshawe ◽  
Cathy Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Online Course Design ◽  
Online Student ◽  
Design Students

Online learning has been widely adopted in higher education but there is a need to better understand the nature of student engagement with online courses. For example, there are questions about whether students engage with courses as educators intend and what features of online courses engage students to enhance learning. Bringing together student and educator perspectives, this article reports on a study that identified ‘pedagogical touchpoints’ – opportunities within online courses for student engagement – to ascertain whether a better understanding of these could improve online course design and student engagement. Data were collected across three undergraduate online courses. Data analysis produced three key findings: mapping pedagogical touchpoints against dimensions of engagement reveals patterns that may inform enhanced course design, students’ engagement with pedagogical touchpoints varies according to their learning needs and desires, and mapping pedagogical touchpoints can inform course design at both conceptual and practical levels. Discussion of the findings highlights that purposeful design of online courses, including strategic planning for pedagogical touchpoints, can maximise the potential for student engagement and consequent learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document