Trauma pan-computed tomography (CT) reporting discrepancies at a major trauma centre between registrar and consultant reports

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. S17
Author(s):  
Vincent Leung ◽  
Nick Watson ◽  
Anand Sastry
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Reporting Discrepancies

scholarly journals An assessment of pelvic binder placement at a UK major trauma centre

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Naseem ◽  
PD Nesbitt ◽  
DC Sprott ◽  
A Clayson
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Continuing Education ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Pelvic Ring ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Pelvic Ring Injury ◽  
Pelvic Ring Injuries ◽  
Pelvic Binder ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

Introduction Pelvic binders are used to reduce the haemorrhage associated with pelvic ring injuries. Application at the level of the greater trochanters is required. We assessed the frequency of their use in patients with pelvic ring injuries and their positioning in patients presenting to a single major trauma centre. Methods A retrospective review of our trauma database was performed to randomly select 1000 patients for study from April 2012 to December 2016. Patients with a pelvic binder or a pelvic ring injury defined by the Young and Burgess classification were included. Computed tomography was used to identify and measure pelvic binder placement. Results 140 patients were identified: 110/140 had a binder placed. Of the total, 54 (49.1%) patients had satisfactory placement and 56 (50.9%) had unsatisfactory placement; 30/67 (44.8%) patients with a pelvic ring injury had no binder applied, of whom 6 (20%) had an unstable injury; 9/67 patients died. Discussion This is the first study assessing pelvic binder placement in patients at a UK major trauma centre. Unsatisfactory positioning of the pelvic binder is a common problem and it was not used in a large proportion of patients with pelvic ring injuries. This demonstrates that there is a need for continuing education for teams dealing with major trauma.

Time to computed tomography: does this affect trauma patient outcomes? A retrospective analysis at an Australian major trauma centre

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1475-1479
Author(s):  
Cedric L. H. Ng ◽  
Jason Kim ◽  
Ben Dobson ◽  
Don Campbell ◽  
Martin Wullschleger
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Trauma Patient ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

Incidental findings on whole-body trauma computed tomography: Experience at a major trauma centre

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 691-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew K.T. Seah ◽  
Colin G. Murphy ◽  
Scott McDonald ◽  
Andrew Carrothers
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

Laparotomy for Abdominal Stab Wound With Combined Omental and Organ Evisceration: 10-Year Experience From a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110318
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
Nigel Rajaretnam ◽  
Rohit Sarvepalli ◽  
William Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Large Bowel ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Overall Mortality

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.

scholarly journals 592 Surgical Management of Open Tibia Fractures at A Major Trauma Centre: A Review of Cases Over A One-Year Period

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khajuria
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Open Fracture ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Internal Stabilization ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document