Diagnostic value of combined diffusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement MRI in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 793.e1-793.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cao ◽  
L. Xiao ◽  
B. He ◽  
G. Zhang ◽  
J. Dong ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 766-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M.Th. Schmitz ◽  
Wouter B. Veldhuis ◽  
Marian B.E. Menke-Pluijmers ◽  
Wybe J.M. van der Kemp ◽  
Tijl A. van der Velden ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512092790
Author(s):  
Jeanette Henkelmann ◽  
Kristina Bremicker ◽  
Timm Denecke ◽  
Karl-Titus Hoffmann ◽  
Ralf Henkelmann ◽  
...  

Background Despite the high sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), early detection of spondylodiscitis (SpD) remains challenging due to its low specificity. Purpose To assess the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in suspected cases of SpD with ambiguous early MRI findings in the differentiation of degenerative disorders (DD). Material and Methods In this prospective study, 52 patients suspected of having SpD underwent a whole-spine 3-T MRI scan comprising sagittal DWI. Of 58 conspicuous, T2-weighted, signal increased discs, 39 were successfully evaluated using DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC maps were blindly analyzed using the region of interest of the conspicuous disc and a normal adjacent reference disc. Intraindividual ratios (conspicuous disc: reference disc) were calculated. Results All conspicuous discs showed increased absolute ADC values, which did not differ significantly between SpD (n = 22) and DD (n = 17). However, ADC ratio was significantly higher in SpD vs. DD ( P < 0.05). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an ADC ratio threshold of 1.6 resulted in 45% sensitivity and 88% specificity (area under the curve = 0.69) for SpD diagnosis. Conclusion The absolute ADC value does not provide a reliable diagnosis of SpD. Increased diffusivity can be an indication of infection but should always be discussed in the context of existing disc degeneration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maho Tsubakimoto ◽  
Tsuneo Yamashiro ◽  
Nanae Tsuchiya ◽  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Hiroki Maehara ◽  
...  

Background Elastofibroma dorsi is a rare pseudotumoral lesion. Thus, there is no report of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that investigates multiple patients particularly with respect to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings and contrast enhancement patterns. Purpose To describe the imaging findings of elastofibroma on MRI, particularly DWI findings and contrast enhancement patterns, and to further investigate patient demographics. Material and Methods Forty-four patients with elastofibroma that underwent MRI were enrolled in this retrospective study. All images were evaluated by two radiologists to visually assess the signal intensity for each sequence. Enhanced elastofibromas were classified into four categories to assess the enhancement pattern. Differences in gender and laterality were also assessed statistically. Results An equal number of men and women were included (n = 22 each). There was no significant difference in laterality ( P = 0.783). All lesions (73 lesions) had low signal intensity on both T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) images: heterogeneous in 56, homogeneous in 17. None of the 41 lesions with DWI had true abnormal diffusion restriction. The average ADC value was 1.36 × 10–3 ± 0.29 mm2/s. All 31 lesions that had contrast-enhanced MRI were classified according to enhancement pattern: homogeneous (three lesions, 9.7%); heterogeneous (15 lesions, 48.4%); streak-like (three lesions, 9.7%); and rim-like (ten lesions, 32.2%). Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in gender or laterality. Elastofibroma showed homogeneous to heterogeneous low signal intensity on T1W and T2W images. No lesion showed abnormal diffusion restriction, and all lesions demonstrated enhancement on MRI.


2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (1019) ◽  
pp. e1046-e1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Ananthakrishnan ◽  
G Macnaught ◽  
L Hinksman ◽  
H Gilmour ◽  
K P Forbes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Javadrashid ◽  
Abolhassan Shakeri Bavil Olyaei ◽  
Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni ◽  
Roghayeh Razzaghi ◽  
Javad Jalili ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document