The effect of melatonin supplementation on liver indices in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 102398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Mansoori ◽  
Zahra Salimi ◽  
Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini ◽  
Razie Hormoznejad ◽  
Sima Jafarirad ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (1116) ◽  
pp. 556-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kannan Sridharan ◽  
Gowri Sivaramakrishnan ◽  
Reginald Paul Sequeira ◽  
Abdelaziz Elamin

AimSeveral drugs have been used for treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The present study is a network meta-analysis of such drugs.Design, setting and patientsRandomised clinical trials comparing drug interventions in patients with NAFLD were analysed. OR and weighted mean difference (95 % CI) were the effect estimates for categorical and numerical outcomes, respectively. Random-effects model was used to generate pooled estimates. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to rank the treatments.Main outcome measuresProportion of responders was the primary outcome measure and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis scores, liver enzymes, lipid profile, body mass index, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, intrahepatic fat and adverse events were the key secondary outcomes.Results116 studies were included in the systematic review and 106 in the meta-analysis. Elafibranor, gemfibrozil, metadoxine, obeticholic acid, pentoxifylline, pioglitazone, probiotics, telmisartan, vildagliptin and vitamin E significantly increased the response rate than standard of care. Various other drugs were observed to modify the secondary outcomes favourably. Probiotics was found with a better response in children; and elafibranor, obeticholic acid, pentoxifylline and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quality of evidence observed was either low or very low.ConclusionIn patients with NAFLD, several drugs have been shown to have variable therapeutic benefit. However, the estimates and the inferences should be considered with extreme caution as it might change with the advent of future head-to-head clinical trials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211774522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Akhavan Rezayat ◽  
Malihe Dadgar Moghadam ◽  
Mohammad Ghasemi Nour ◽  
Matin Shirazinia ◽  
Hamidreza Ghodsi ◽  
...  

Background/aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is one of the most common chronic liver diseases. Some risk factors are known to influence the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but the effect of tobacco smoking on the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is controversial. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the association between smoking and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Method: Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) were searched to find published articles on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and smoking until December 2016. All relevant studies were screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria and compatible studies were chosen. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible articles. Subsequently, information was gathered based on the following: author, publication year, keywords, country, inclusion and exclusion criteria, main results, study design, conclusion, and confounder variables (age, body mass index, gender, ethnicity, and diabetes). Finally, analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. Results: Data were extracted from 20 observational studies (9 cross-sectional, 6 case-control, 4 cohort studies, and 1 retrospective cohort study). A significant association was observed between smoking and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with a pooled odds ratio of 1.110 (95% confidence interval, 1.028–1.199), p-value = 0.008. The statistical heterogeneity was medium with an I2 of 40.012%, p-heterogeneity = 0.074. Also there was a significant relation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and passive smoking with a pooled odds ratio of 1.380 (95% confidence interval, 1.199–1.588; p-value = 0.001; I2 = 59.41; p-heterogeneity = 0.117). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking is significantly associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Further prospective studies exploring the underlying mechanisms of this association should be pursued. Also passive smoking increases the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease about 1.38-fold. The effects of smoking cigarettes on active smokers (current smoker, former smoker, and total smoker) are less than passive smokers. Further studies are needed to compare the of effects of passive and active smoking on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.


Nutrition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 111092
Author(s):  
Georgios Kalopitas ◽  
Christina Antza ◽  
Ioannis Doundoulakis ◽  
Antonis Siargkas ◽  
Elias Kouroumalis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1344-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bora Lee ◽  
Eun‐Ae Jung ◽  
Jeong‐Ju Yoo ◽  
Sang Gyune Kim ◽  
Cheon‐Beom Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document