Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth — Retrospective study up to 13 years

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1308-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edina Lempel ◽  
Bálint Viktor Lovász ◽  
Edina Bihari ◽  
Károly Krajczár ◽  
Sára Jeges ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Adolphi ◽  
M. Zehnder ◽  
L. M. Bachmann ◽  
T. N. Göhring

Clinical Relevance In endodontically-treated posterior teeth, minimal direct composite restorations had a tendency to fail more often than their counterparts in vital teeth.


Author(s):  
Ayse Ruya Yazici ◽  
Zeynep Bilge Kutuk ◽  
Esra Ergin ◽  
Sevilay Karahan ◽  
Sibel A. Antonson

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dukic ◽  
O. L. Dukic ◽  
S. Milardovic ◽  
B. Delija

Clinical Relevance Indirect resin composite restorations represent a good choice for the therapy of severely damaged teeth. There is no clinical difference between Ormocer and nano-hybrid resin composite after 36 months.


Dental Update ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Trevor Burke ◽  
Louis Mackenzie ◽  
Adrian CC Shortall

The use of resin composite for routine restoration of cavities in posterior teeth is now commonplace, and will increase further following the Minamata Agreement and patient requests for tooth-coloured restorations in their posterior teeth. It is therefore relevant to evaluate the published survival rates of such restorations. A Medline search identified 144 possible studies, this being reduced to 24 when inclusion criteria were introduced. Of these, ten directly compared amalgam and composite, eight were cohort studies, and six were systematic reviews. It was concluded that posterior composites may provide restorations of satisfactory longevity and with survival rates generally similar to those published on amalgam restorations. However, the ability of the operator in placing the restoration may have a profound effect. CPD/Clinical Relevance: With the increasing use of composite for restorations in posterior teeth, it is relevant to note that these may provide good rates for survival.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso ◽  
Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos ◽  
Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes ◽  
Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávio Renato Reis de Moura ◽  
Ana Regina Romano ◽  
Rafael Guerra Lund ◽  
Evandro Piva ◽  
Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues Júnior ◽  
...  

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical performance and the reasons for failure of anterior and posterior composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students over a 3-year period. All cavities were restored using Prime & Bond 2.1 and TPH (Dentsply), according to the manufacturer's indications. One hundred and two patients who had received composite restorations by third and forth year undergraduate students were recalled and examined to analyze the quality of the restorations. The restorations were evaluated using the modified USPHS system. Two hundred and fifty-six composite restorations, 170 in anterior teeth and 86 in posterior teeth, were evaluated. Eighty-five percent of the restorations were considered satisfactory after 3 years. Class II and class IV restorations presented the highest prevalence of failure. Loss of the restoration and deficient marginal adaptation were the main causes of failure. No restoration failed due to secondary caries. Most restorations placed by dental students were considered satisfactory after long-term evaluation. Failure was more prevalent in larger restorations and was not associated with secondary caries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document