scholarly journals Data and material of the Safe-Range-Inventory: An assistance tool helping to improve the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles

Data in Brief ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 573-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus-Christian Carbon ◽  
Fabian Gebauer
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Charging Infrastructure ◽  
Assistance Tool

scholarly journals To Represent Electric Vehicles in Electricity Systems Modelling—Aggregated Vehicle Representation vs. Individual Driving Profiles

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 539
Author(s):  
Maria Taljegard ◽  
Lisa Göransson ◽  
Mikael Odenberger ◽  
Filip Johnsson
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Investment Model ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Charging Infrastructure ◽  
Vehicle To Grid ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Electricity System ◽  
Home Location ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Storage Technologies

This study describes, applies, and compares three different approaches to integrate electric vehicles (EVs) in a cost-minimising electricity system investment model and a dispatch model. The approaches include both an aggregated vehicle representation and individual driving profiles of passenger EVs. The driving patterns of 426 randomly selected vehicles in Sweden were recorded between 30 and 73 days each and used as input to the electricity system model for the individual driving profiles. The main conclusion is that an aggregated vehicle representation gives similar results as when including individual driving profiles for most scenarios modelled. However, this study also concludes that it is important to represent the heterogeneity of individual driving profiles in electricity system optimisation models when: (i) charging infrastructure is limited to only the home location in regions with a high share of solar and wind power in the electricity system, and (ii) when addressing special research issues such as impact of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) on battery health status. An aggregated vehicle representation will, if the charging infrastructure is limited to only home location, over-estimate the V2G potential resulting in a higher share (up to 10 percentage points) of variable renewable electricity generation and an under-estimation of investments in both short- and long-term storage technologies.

BMS-driven onsite insolation charging infrastructure for electric vehicles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Gupta ◽  
Himanshu Priyadarshi ◽  
Vishnu Goyal ◽  
Kulwant Singh ◽  
Ashish Shrivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Charging Infrastructure

Electric vehicles and charging infrastructure in Turkey: An overview

2021 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 110913
Author(s):  
Ömer Gönül ◽  
A. Can Duman ◽  
Önder Güler
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Charging Infrastructure

Assessment of electric vehicles concerning impacts, charging infrastructure with unidirectional and bidirectional chargers, and power flow comparisons

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 3416-3441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salman Habib ◽  
Muhammad Mansoor Khan ◽  
Farukh Abbas ◽  
Houjun Tang
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Power Flow ◽  
Charging Infrastructure

Electric vehicles in China: A review of current policies

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1512-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbo Li ◽  
Muyi Yang ◽  
Suwin Sandu
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Transport Sector ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Chinese Government ◽  
Monetary Incentives ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Charging Infrastructure ◽  
Technical Performance ◽  
Primary Focus

Prompted by the urgency of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector, the Chinese government has set ambitious targets for the uptake of electric vehicles. To achieve these targets is however a challenging task, due to various barriers in the uptake of electric vehicles, at both micro- and macro-levels. A range of monetary and non-monetary incentives has been implemented, or being considered for implementation, to overcome these barriers. This paper reviews these incentives with a view to assess the extent to which they are likely to remove the barriers in the uptake of electric vehicles. The review suggests that the primary focus of these incentives is to remove the micro-level barriers, such as high upfront costs, poor technical performance, and insufficient charging infrastructure. Limited attention has been paid to the macro-level barriers (for example, fragmented authority and local protectionism), despite ample evidence suggesting that these barriers could significantly impede the uptake of electric vehicles. Further, these incentives have tended to rely on regulation-based measures to remove the barriers. Only in the recent years, there appears to be a gradual shift towards market-based measures. This shift could improve the effectiveness of electric vehicle policies. The effectiveness of these policies could be enhanced if one recognizes the underlying macro-level barriers that are likely to protract or distort the implementation of market-based measures. This paper also provides some recommendations to remove these macro-level barriers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document