scholarly journals Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset)

Data in Brief ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 104852
Author(s):  
Sang Won Yoon ◽  
Hyun Kang ◽  
Geun Joo Choi ◽  
Choongun Ryu ◽  
Yong Hee Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Peak Inspiratory Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Leak Pressure ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Pressure Peak ◽  
Airway Devices

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk adult patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Jun Lai ◽  
Yi-Chun Yeh ◽  
Yu-Kang Tu ◽  
Ya-Jung Cheng ◽  
Chih-Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laryngeal Tube ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Tube Suction ◽  
Airway Devices

AbstractNumerous supraglottic airway device (SADs) have been designed for adults; however, their relative efficacy, indicated by parameters such as adequacy of sealing, ease of application, and postinsertion complications, remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various SADs. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing at least two types of SADs published before December 2019. The primary outcomes were oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), risk of first-attempt insertion failure, and postoperative sore throat rate (POST). We included 108 studies (n = 10,645) comparing 17 types of SAD. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the I-gel supraglottic airway, the Supreme LMA, the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway, the SoftSeal, the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway, the Air-Q, the Laryngeal Tube, the Laryngeal Tube Suction II, the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable, AuraGain, and Protector had significantly higher OLP (mean difference ranging from 3.98 to 9.18 cmH2O) compared with that of a classic LMA (C-LMA). The Protector exhibited the highest OLP and was ranked first. All SADs had a similar likelihood of first-attempt insertion failure and POST compared with the C-LMA. Our findings indicate that the Protector may be the best SAD because it has the highest OLP.Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42017065273.

scholarly journals A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in Young Pediatric Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ha-Jung Kim ◽  
Hee-Sun Park ◽  
Soo-Young Kim ◽  
Young-Jin Ro ◽  
Hong-Seuk Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Leak Pressure ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Effective Ventilation ◽  
Airway Devices

Supraglottic airway devices have been increasingly used because of their several advantages. Previous studies showed that the small-sized i-gel provides effective ventilation for young pediatric patients; however, few studies have reported the use of AuraGain in these patients. Herein, we compared the clinical performance of AuraGain and i-gel in young pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 6 years old and weighing 5–20 kg, who were scheduled to undergo extremity surgery under general anesthesia. In total, 68 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: AuraGain group and i-gel group. The primary outcome was the requirement of additional airway maneuvers. We also analyzed insertion parameters, fiberoptic bronchoscopic view, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and peri-operative adverse effects. Compared with the AuraGain group, the i-gel group required more additional airway maneuvers during the placement of the device and maintenance of ventilation. The fiberoptic view was better in the AuraGain group than in the i-gel group. However, the oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher in the i-gel group. AuraGain might be a better choice over i-gel considering the requirement of additional airway maneuvers. However, when a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure is required, the i-gel is more beneficial than AuraGain.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Proseal, Supreme, and I-Gel SAD in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanli Mukadder ◽  
Begec Zekine ◽  
Kayhan Gulay Erdogan ◽  
Ozgul Ulku ◽  
Ucar Muharrem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Lower Airway ◽  
Trendelenburg Position ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Pharyngeal Region ◽  
Airway Devices ◽  
Time Ease

We compared proseal, supreme, and i-gel supraglottic airway devices in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressures and airway morbidities in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. One hundred and five patients undergoing elective surgery were subjected to general anesthesia after which they were randomly distributed into three groups. Although the oropharyngeal leak pressure was lower in the i-gel group initially (mean ± standard deviation; 23.9 ± 2.4, 24.9 ± 2.9, and 20.9 ± 3.5, resp.), it was higher than the proseal group and supreme group at 30 min of surgery after the trendelenburg position (25.0 ± 2.3, 25.0 ± 1.9, and 28.3 ± 2.3, resp.) and at the 60 min of surgery (24.2 ± 2.1, 24.8 ± 2.2, and 29.5 ± 1.1, resp.). The time to apply the supraglottic airway devices was shorter in the i-gel group (12.2 (1.2), 12.9 (1.0), and 6.7 (1.2), resp.,P=0.001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of their fiber optic imaging levels. pH was measured at the anterior and posterior surfaces of the pharyngeal region after the supraglottic airway devices were removed; the lowest pH values were 5 in all groups. We concluded that initial oropharyngeal leak pressures obtained by i-gel were lower than proseal and supreme, but increased oropharyngeal leak pressures over time, ease of placement, and lower airway morbidity are favorable for i-gel.

scholarly journals Gum-elastic Bougie-guided Insertion of the ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway: A New Technique

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Howath ◽  
J. Brimacombe ◽  
C. Keller
Keyword(s):  
Laryngeal Mask Airway ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Laryngeal Mask ◽  
Drainage Tube ◽  
Leak Pressure ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Low Incidence

We determined the success rates, cardiovascular responses and airway morbidity for gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. One hundred anaesthetized, non-paralyzed adults (ASA 1–2, aged 18 to 80 years) were studied. The ProSeal LMA drainage tube was primed with a well-lubricated 16 French gauge gum-elastic bougie with the curved end proximal and the straight end protruding 30 cm beyond the drainage tube tip. The straight end of the gum-elastic bougie was inserted into the oesophagus under laryngoscopic guidance, the laryngoscope removed and the ProSeal LMA inserted using the standard insertion technique and the gum-elastic bougie as a guide. The following variables were recorded: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, ventilatory capability, ease of gastric tube insertion, blood staining on the bougie or LMA at removal, and postoperative airway morbidity. Haemodynamic data were recorded immediately pre-insertion and every minute for five minutes after insertion. Gum-elastic bougie and ProSeal LMA insertion was successful at the first attempt in all patients within 50 seconds. There were no significant increases in heart rate or blood pressure. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 33 (17–40) cmH 2 O and ventilation was possible without leak in all patients at 9.5 ml.kg –1 tidal volume. There were no drainage tube or gastric air leaks. Gastric tube insertion was successful at the first attempt in all patients. Blood staining at removal was not detected on the gum-elastic bougie, but was detected in 3% of ProSeal LMAs. The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia and dysarthria was 21%, 9% and 1% respectively. We conclude that gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal LMA has a high success rate and is associated with minimal haemodynamic change and a low incidence of trauma.

scholarly journals Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0216673
Author(s):  
Min-Soo Kim ◽  
Jin Ha Park ◽  
Ki-Young Lee ◽  
Seung Ho Choi ◽  
Hwan Ho Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Neck Position ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Airway Devices ◽  
Head And Neck Position

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Two Disposable Supraglottic Devices in Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Gynecology

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
Sebanti Goswami ◽  
Suman Chattopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Leak Pressure ◽  
Bite Block ◽  
Inflatable Cuff ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Lma Supreme ◽  
Airway Devices ◽  
To Receive

ABSTRACT Introduction This prospective study compares the efficacy of two disposable supraglottic airway devices with separate gastric access and integral bite block, the inflatable cuff of the LMA SupremeTM against the noninflatable i-gelTM cuff in providing an adequate seal for laparoscopic surgery. Materials and methods Ninety women of ASA grade I and II undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with Trendelenburg position were randomly allocated to receive either size 3 LMA Supreme or i-gel. Induction and maintenance protocols were similar and patients were not paralyzed. We compared the airway leak pressure, ease and time to insert the device and a 10 FG nasogastric tube through it, and to note complications if any. Results There was no difference in airway leak pressure between the two devices (24.4 ± 4.0 vs 23.6 ± 3.8 cm H2O, p > 0.05). Forty-one (91%) LMA Supremes and forty (88.8%) i-gels were successfully inserted on the first attempt, with similar ease, and comparable times (13.8 ± 4.9 sec for LMA Supreme vs 14.5 ± 6.7 sec for i-gel; p > 0.05). Gastric tube insertion was easier and achieved more quickly with LMA Supreme compared to i-gel (9.0 ± 3.1 sec vs 14.3 ± 7.5 sec, respectively; p < 0.01), but clinical significance of this finding is questionable. There was blood on removal of four LMA Supremes and three i-gel. Four patients in the LMA Supreme group and one patient in the i-gel group experience mild postoperative sore throat. Conclusion Both LMA Supreme and i-gel are equally effective ventilator devices for diagnostic gynecological laparoscopic procedures. How to cite this article Chattopadhyay S, Goswami S. A Comparative Study of Two Disposable Supraglottic Devices in Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Gynecology. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2013;5(3):124-128.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document