scholarly journals Lack of sex differences to the subjective effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers

2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Zacny ◽  
Jenny M. Jun
Author(s):  
Sunjeev K Kamboj ◽  
Hannah Zhao ◽  
Luzia Troebinger ◽  
Giulia Piazza ◽  
Emma Cawley ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an anesthetic gas with both therapeutic and abuse potential. Because N2O is an NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, its effects are expected to resemble those of the prototypical NMDAR antagonist, ketamine. In this study, we examined the subjective rewarding effects of N2O using measures previously employed in studies of ketamine. We also tested for moderation of these effects by bipolar phenotype, depressive symptoms, and impulsivity. Methods Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to either 50% N2O (n = 40) or medical air (n = 40). Self-reported rewarding (liking and wanting), and alcohol-like effects were assessed pre-, peri- and post inhalation. Results Effect sizes for the various rewarding/alcohol-like effects of N2O were generally similar to those reported in studies of moderate-dose ketamine. Impulsivity moderated the subjective reinforcing (liking) effects of inhaled gas, while depressive symptoms moderated motivational (wanting [more]) effects. However, depression and impulsivity had opposite directional influences, such that higher impulsivity was associated with higher N2O liking, and higher depression, with lower N2O wanting. Conclusion To the extent that static (versus longitudinal) subjective rewarding effects are a reliable indicator of future problematic drug use, our findings suggests that impulsivity and depression may predispose and protect, respectively, against N2O abuse. Future studies should examine if these moderators are relevant for other NMDAR antagonists, including ketamine, and novel ketamine-like therapeutic and recreational drugs. Similarities between moderate-dose N2O and moderate-dose ketamine in the intensity of certain subjective effects suggest that N2O may, at least to some extent, serve as substitute for ketamine as a safe and easily implemented experimental tool for probing reward-related NMDAR function and dysfunction in humans.


1977 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland M. Atkinson ◽  
Pius Morozumi ◽  
J. DeWayne Green ◽  
John C. Kramer

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 718-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Black ◽  
Joanna L. Hill ◽  
James P. Zacny

Background The subjective and psychomotor effects of remifentanil have not been evaluated. Accordingly, the authors used mood inventories and psychomotor tests to characterize the effects of remifentanil in healthy, non-drug-abusing volunteers. Alfentanil was used as a comparator drug. Methods Ten healthy volunteers were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in which they received an infusion of saline, remifentanil, or alfentanil for 120 min. The age- and weight-adjusted infusions (determined with STANPUMP, a computer modeling software package) were given to achieve three predicted constant plasma levels for 40 min each of remifentanil (0.75, 1.5, and 3 ng/ml) and alfentanil (16, 32, and 64 ng/ml). Mood forms and psychomotor tests were completed, and miosis was assessed, during and after the infusions. In addition, analgesia was tested at each dose level using a cold-pressor test. Results Remifentanil had prototypic micro-like opioid subjective effects, impaired psychomotor performance, and produced analgesia. Alfentanil at the dose range tested had more mild effects on these measures, and the analgesia data indicated that a 40:1 potency ratio, rather than the 20:1 ratio we used, may exist between remifentanil and alfentanil. A psychomotor test administered 60 min after the remifentanil infusion was discontinued showed that the volunteers were still impaired, although they reported feeling no drug effects. Conclusions The notion that the pharmacodynamic effects of remifentanil are extremely short-lived after the drug is no longer administered must be questioned given our findings that psychomotor effects were still apparent 1 h after the infusion was discontinued.


Author(s):  
Robert J. Biersner

Twenty-one U.S. Navy divers were given several standard visual tests, the Purdue Peg-board, the Bennett Hand Tool Dexterity Test, and the Wechsler Memory Scale while breathing air or 30% nitrous oxide. The results showed that visual function, fine and gross motor performance, and long-term memory were normal under nitrous oxide, while learning and short-term memory were significantly impaired. The subjective effects of breathing nitrous oxide were similar to those experienced during compressed air narcosis. The selective impairment of short-term memory suggests that divers might be able to perform useful work at depths deeper than those currently authorized, provided the tasks were well learned and practiced.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Warot ◽  
E Corruble ◽  
C Payan ◽  
JS Weil ◽  
AJ Puech

SummaryThe subjective, behavioral and physiological effects of modafinil (300 mg PO) a new central adrenergic stimulant, were compared with those of dextroamphetamine (15 mg PO), caffeine (300 mg PO) and placebo in a randomized double-blind cross-over study. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study y: 8 males and 8 females with no history of drug abuse and moderate use of caffeine. Subjective and behavioral effects were studied using the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI), Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Visual Analog Scales before and 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post single oral dosing. Results showed that subjective effects of modafinil (300 mg) differed markedly from those of dextroamphetamine (15 mg). They were close to those produced by caffeine (300 mg). These results indicate that modafinil (300 mg) does not possess amphetamine-like subjective effects in a healthy population. If subjective feelings are related to drug abuse liability, it could be assumed that modafinil, at the dose used in therapeutics, does not possess any abuse liability comparable to amphetamine.


1995 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Zacny ◽  
Santosh Yajnik ◽  
Dennish Coalson ◽  
J.Lance. Lichtor ◽  
Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Zacny ◽  
Jerome M. Klafta ◽  
Dennis W. Coalson ◽  
Sandy Marks ◽  
Christopher J. Young ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-308
Author(s):  
Mollie S Pester ◽  
Matthew G Kirkpatrick ◽  
Bree A Geary ◽  
Adam M Leventhal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document