Hepatitis C treatment as prevention in the prison setting: Assessments of acceptability of treatment scale up efforts by prison correctional and health personnel

2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 103379
Author(s):  
L. Lafferty ◽  
J. Rance ◽  
G.J. Dore ◽  
J. Grebely ◽  
A.R. Lloyd ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Rance ◽  
◽  
Lise Lafferty ◽  
Carla Treloar

Abstract Background With direct-acting antivirals dramatically reshaping the public health response to the hepatitis C virus (HCV), prisons are set to play a critical role in elimination efforts. Despite the theoretical demonstration of HCV treatment-as-prevention in prison in mathematical modeling, limited empirical data exist. The Australian ‘Surveillance and Treatment of Prisoners with Hepatitis C’ project (SToP-C) is the world’s first trial of HCV treatment-as-prevention in prison. Drawing on interviews with HCV expert stakeholders, this paper explores the factors respondents identified as crucial to the success of future scale-up. Accounting for such perspectives matters because of the influence expert discourse has in shaping implementation. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nineteen HCV experts working across key policy, advocacy, research and clinical dimensions of the Australian HCV response. Data were coded using qualitative data management software (NVivo 11). Analysis proceeded via a hybrid deductive and inductive approach. Results Notwithstanding concerns regarding the lack of primary prevention in Australian prisons, stakeholders reported broad levels of support for the intervention and for the future scale-up of HCV treatment. A number of considerations, both external and internal to the prison system, were identified as key. The principal external factor was an enabling political-cum-policy environment; internal factors included: obtaining support from prisons’ executive and custodial staff; promoting health within a security-first institutional culture; allocating time for treatment within prisoners’ tightly regulated schedules; ensuring institutional stability during treatment given the routine movement of prisoners between prisons; prioritizing the availability of retreatment given the paucity of primary prevention; and securing sufficient clinical space for treatment. Conclusion The challenges to implementation are considerable, ranging from macrolevel concerns to in-prison logistical matters. Nonetheless, we argue that prisons remain an obvious setting for treatment scale-up, not only for prevention and potential elimination benefit, but for the treatment opportunities they afford a socially disadvantaged and underserved population. While noting widespread concerns among respondents regarding the paucity of primary prevention in Australian prisons, results indicate broad levels of support among expert stakeholders for HCV treatment scale-up in prison.


2019 ◽  
Vol 210 (9) ◽  
pp. 391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Papaluca ◽  
Margaret E Hellard ◽  
Alexander J V Thompson ◽  
Andrew R Lloyd

AIDS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Kronfli ◽  
Sahir R. Bhatnagar ◽  
Mark W. Hull ◽  
Erica E.M. Moodie ◽  
Joseph Cox ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behzad Hajarizadeh ◽  
Jason Grebely ◽  
Marianne Martinello ◽  
Gail V Matthews ◽  
Andrew R Lloyd ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behzad Hajarizadeh ◽  
Jason Grebely ◽  
Marianne Byrne ◽  
Pip Marks ◽  
Janaki Amin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S42-S42
Author(s):  
Magnus Gottfredsson ◽  
Thorarinn Tyrfingsson ◽  
Valgerdur Runarsdottir ◽  
Ottar M Bergmann ◽  
Einar S Bjornsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Iceland, an island with a population of 330,000 has a HCV seroprevalence of 0.3% and an estimated total of 800–1000 patients. There is good access to health care among people who inject drugs (PWID) and Iceland thus serves as an ideal setting for a proof of concept intervention, aiming for elimination of the disease as a public health threat. If elimination is to be achieved PWID, who are key drivers of transmission, need to be a focus of treatment scale up. Methods All patients in the country infected with HCV were offered direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) starting in 01/2016. The regimens are chosen according to national guidelines; SOF/LDV +/−RBV through October 2016 and SOF/VEL +/− RBV thereafter. People with recent injection drug use (IDU), prisoners and patients with advanced liver disease are prioritized. PWID receive additional support to facilitate compliance. Various strategies are employed to enhance case detection and harm reduction. The goal is to initiate treatment for every patient in Iceland within 36 months (end-2018), aiming for elimination of domestic transmission of HCV. Results Twelve months after launching the nationwide program 527 patients had been evaluated, 53–66% of the estimated total patient population. The mean age is 42 years (range, 17–70 years, 2 males to every female). The reported main route of infection was IDU (90%). At the time of evaluation, 33% reported recent (within 6 months) IDU, 6% were homeless, and 5% in prison. Stimulants were the preferred IV drug among 84% of PWID but opiates by only 14%; overall 15% were receiving opiate substitution therapy (OST). During the first 12 months of the study period treatment with DAAs was initiated in 480 patients and 322 were scheduled to complete protocol. Drop-out rate is 6.5%. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) for the entire group, including patients who dropped out or are lost to follow-up is 90%. It is significantly lower among the homeless (60%) and active IDU (83% vs. 93%, P = 0.007). Conclusion A relatively large proportion of HCV infected patients in the community, including people actively injecting drugs, can be initiated on treatment in a short period of time. Current drug use does not preclude treatment success. Disclosures M. Gottfredsson, Gilead: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Astellas: Consultant, Speaker honorarium


Hepatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 402-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Levy ◽  
Sarah Larney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document