scholarly journals Early Cambrian chronostratigraphy and geochronology of South Australia

2018 ◽  
Vol 185 ◽  
pp. 498-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa J. Betts ◽  
John R. Paterson ◽  
Sarah M. Jacquet ◽  
Anita S. Andrew ◽  
Philip A. Hall ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 420-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa J. Betts ◽  
Timothy P. Topper ◽  
James L. Valentine ◽  
Christian B. Skovsted ◽  
John R. Paterson ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Pratt

The fossil record of siliceous sponges—Hexactinellida and demosponge “Lithistida”—hinges upon both body fossils plus isolated spicules mostly recovered from limestones by acid digestion. The earliest record of siliceous sponge spicules extends back to the late Neoproterozoic of Hubei, southern China (Steiner et al., 1993) and Mongolia (Brasier et al., 1997), and body fossils attributed to the hexactinellids have been described from the Ediacaran of South Australia (Gehling and Rigby, 1996); thus they are the oldest-known definite representatives of extant animal phyla. The Early Cambrian saw a remarkable diversification in spicule morphology, with the appearance of an essentially “modern” array of forms (Zhang and Pratt, 1994). While a diversity decline may have occurred with the late Early Cambrian extinction(s), the subsequent Paleozoic and Mesozoic fossil record of spicules shows a relatively consistent range of morphologies (e.g., Mostler, 1986; Bengtson et al., 1990; Webby and Trotter, 1993; Kozur et al., 1996; Zhang and Pratt, 2000). However, because spicule form is not restricted to individual taxa and many sponge species secrete a variety of spicule shapes, it is difficult to gauge true siliceous sponge diversity and to explore their biostratigraphic utility using only isolated spicules.


Lethaia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN R. PATERSON ◽  
GLENN A. BROCK ◽  
CHRISTIAN B. SKOVSTED

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 240-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa J. Betts ◽  
John R. Paterson ◽  
James B. Jago ◽  
Sarah M. Jacquet ◽  
Christian B. Skovsted ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Kruse ◽  
Anna Gandin ◽  
Françoise Debrenne ◽  
Rachel Wood

AbstractThe Neoproterozoic–Cambrian succession in the Zavkhan Basin of western Mongolia preserves early Cambrian bioconstructions of Nemakit-Daldynian to Botomian age. As elsewhere (Siberia, Morocco), the Nemakit-Daldynian bioconstructions in the upper Tsagaan Oloom Formation to lower Bayan Gol Formation interval were purely calcimicrobial. Spectacular calcimicrobial ‘patch reefs’ of presumed Tommotian age are present in the lower Bayan Gol Formation. In contrast, late Atdabanian–early Botomian bioconstructions are varied and well developed in the upper Salaany Gol Formation including, in addition to calcimicrobial bioherms, Gordonophyton–Razumovskia crusts, radiocyathan—archaeocyathan bioherms and thickets of the ramose archaeocyath Cambrocyathellus.These latter Zavkhan Basin buildups show some ecological and sedimentological features in common with coeval bioconstructions in South Australia, which also developed under a tectonically active regime.


2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingliang Zhang ◽  
Jian Han ◽  
Degan Shu

The early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstatte, generally regarded as late Atdabanian (Qian and Bengtson, 1989; Bengtson et al., 1990), has become celebrated for perhaps the earliest biota of soft-bodied organisms known from the fossil record and has proven to be critical to our understanding of early metazoan evolution. The Sirius Passet fauna from Peary Land, North Greenland, another important repository of soft-bodied and poorly sclerotized fossils, was also claimed as Early Cambrian (Conway Morris et al., 1987; Budd, 1995). The exact stratigraphic position of the Sirius Passet fauna (Buen Formation) is still uncertain, although the possibility of late Atdabanian age was proposed (Vidal and Peel, 1993). Recent work dates it in the “Nevadella” Biozone (Budd and Peel, 1998). It therefore appears to be simultaneous with or perhaps slightly younger than Chengjiang Lagerstatte, Eoredlichia Biozone (Zhuravlev, 1995). The Emu Bay Shale of Kangaroo Island, South Australia, has long been famous as a source of magnificent specimens of the trilobites Redlichia takooensis and Hsunaspis bilobata. It is additionally important as the only site in Australia so far to yield a Burgess-Shale-type biota (Glaessner, 1979; Nedin, 1992). The Emu Bay Shale was considered late Early Cambrian in age (Daily, 1956; Öpik, 1975). But Zhang et al.(1980) reassessed its age based on data from the Chinese Early Cambrian. The occurrence of Redlichia takooensis and closely related species of Hsunaspis indicates an equivalence to the Tsanglangpuian in the Chinese sequence, and the contemporary South Australia fauna correlate with the Botomian of Siberia (Bengtson et al., 1990). Thus the Emu Bay Shale is younger than the upper Atdabanian Chengjiang Lagerstatte, Chiungchussuian.


2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian B. Skovsted ◽  
Uwe Balthasar ◽  
Glenn A. Brock ◽  
John R. Paterson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document