Psychometric properties of self-monitoring of eating disorder urges among treatment seeking women: Ecological momentary assessment using a daily diary method

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio A. Tasca ◽  
Vanessa Illing ◽  
Louise Balfour ◽  
Valerie Krysanski ◽  
Natasha Demidenko ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Wonderlich ◽  
Jason M. Lavender ◽  
Stephen A. Wonderlich ◽  
Carol B. Peterson ◽  
Scott J. Crow ◽  
...  

Assessment ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1683-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey B. Scott ◽  
Martin J. Sliwinski ◽  
Matthew Zawadzki ◽  
Robert S. Stawski ◽  
Jinhyuk Kim ◽  
...  

Despite widespread interest in variance in affect, basic questions remain pertaining to the relative proportions of between-person and within-person variance, the contribution of days and moments, and the reliability of these estimates. We addressed these questions by decomposing negative affect and positive affect variance across three levels (person, day, moment), and calculating reliability using a coordinated analysis of seven daily diary, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and diary-EMA hybrid studies (across studies age = 18-84 years, total Npersons = 2,103, total Nobservations = 45,065). Across studies, within-person variance was sizeable (negative affect: 45% to 66%, positive affect: 25% to 74%); in EMA more within-person variance was attributable to momentary rather than daily level. Reliability was adequate to high at all levels of analysis (within-person: .73-.91; between-person: .96-1.00) despite different items and designs. We discuss the implications of these results for the design of future intensive studies of affect variance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-871
Author(s):  
Gail A. Williams-Kerver ◽  
Stephen A. Wonderlich ◽  
Ross D. Crosby ◽  
Li Cao ◽  
Kathryn E. Smith ◽  
...  

Emotion-regulation theories suggest that affect intensity is crucial in the development and maintenance of eating disorders. However, other aspects of emotional experience, such as lability, differentiation, and inertia, are not as well understood. This study is the first to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine differences in several daily negative affect (NA) indicators among adults diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), or binge-eating disorder (BED). We used EMA data from three large studies to run a series of linear mixed models; the results showed that participants in the AN and BN groups experienced significantly greater NA intensity and better emotion differentiation than participants in the BED group. Alternatively, the BN group demonstrated significantly greater NA lability than the AN group and greater NA inertia than the BED group. These results suggest that several daily affective experiences differ among eating-disorder diagnostic groups and have implications toward distinct conceptualizations and treatments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Warnick ◽  
Sarah C. Westen ◽  
Anastasia Albanese-O’Neill ◽  
Stephanie L. Filipp ◽  
Desmond Schatz ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Smyth ◽  
Stephen Wonderlich ◽  
Ross Crosby ◽  
Raymond Miltenberger ◽  
James Mitchell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document