scholarly journals The potential effects of pre-settlement processes on post-settlement growth and survival of juvenile northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra) in Gulf of Alaska nursery habitats

2017 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin J. Fedewa ◽  
Jessica A. Miller ◽  
Thomas P. Hurst ◽  
Duo Jiang
2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth J. Theuerkauf ◽  
Russell P. Burke ◽  
Romuald N. Lipcius

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
M.G. Hill ◽  
N.A. Mauchline ◽  
K.A. Stannard

A bioassay for assessing relative susceptibility of kiwifruit germplasm to latania scale (Hemiberlesia lataniae) has been developed and validated The method uses cut canes collected from dormant kiwifruit vines in winter Canes are held in coolstore (0C) until required Lengths of cane (40 cm) are held with one end in water at 20C and scale insect crawlers from laboratory cultures are encouraged to settle beneath wool wrapped around the cane Percentage crawler settlement numbers of insects surviving to adulthood and their size are determined and used to assess the relative susceptibility of the plant This method has been validated for H lataniae and used to study kiwifruit resistance and defensive responses The bioassay did not work satisfactorily for greedy scale (H rapax) as crawler settlement was very low Further research has identified cane age as an important determinant of H rapax crawler settlement Young canes harvested in summer enable good settlement of H rapax but canes of this age do not last long enough for the insects to mature (1012 weeks) Canes harvested in autumn while still green will survive to support H rapax settlement growth and survival and can be used to compare kiwifruit resistance to both scale species


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER N. ROOPER ◽  
JENNIFER L. BOLDT ◽  
SONIA BATTEN ◽  
CHRISTOPHER GBURSKI

Oecologia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 173 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M. Graham ◽  
Andrew H. Baird ◽  
Bette L. Willis ◽  
Sean R. Connolly

Aquaculture ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 483 ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rial ◽  
P. Rial ◽  
A. Casal ◽  
N. Costoya ◽  
D. Costas

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth J. Theuerkauf ◽  
Russell P. Burke ◽  
Romuald N. Lipcius

Restoration of the native eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) has been severely hindered by the dwindling supply and rising costs of fossil and new oyster shell for use in reef restoration. Consequently, emphasis has shifted to the use of alternative oyster reef materials, which need to be tested for their effectiveness as settlement substrate. Furthermore, low recruitment of wild larvae has also impeded restoration, indicating a need to assess the potential of field setting of cultured larvae. We experimentally examined oyster settlement, growth and survival on unconsolidated oyster shell, oyster shell embedded vertically in concrete, and concrete Oyster Castles® in field and mesocosm experiments. In addition, we examined settlement success of cultured larvae in the mesocosm experiment. In the field experiment, juvenile recruitment was 3x higher on castles and unconsolidated shell than on embedded shell. Castles retained 4x the number of oysters and hosted 5x the biomass than embedded shell, and retained 1.5x the oysters and hosted 3x the biomass than unconsolidated shell. The proportion of live oyster recruits on castles was 1.5x that on both embedded and unconsolidated shell. In the mesocosm experiment (90-d post-larval deployment), the castles recruited, retained, and hosted an oyster biomass 4x higher than that of unconsolidated and embedded shell. This study confirms that artificial reef materials such as Oyster Castles® are suitable alternative substrates for oyster restoration, and remote setting of larvae onto conditioned substrate can be effective under controlled environmental conditions. Future restoration efforts should consider use of alternative reef substrates and field setting of larvae to maximize oyster recruitment, while simultaneously minimizing the cost of reef restoration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Hurst ◽  
Daniel W. Cooper ◽  
Janet T. Duffy-Anderson ◽  
Edward V. Farley

Abstract Shallow, subtidal waters of coastal embayments are the primary nursery habitats of juvenile Pacific cod through much of their range. However, the importance of these habitats to the Bering Sea population is poorly understood as the Bering Sea offers relatively little of this habitat. In this study, we examined the use of demersal and pelagic habitats in the southeast Bering Sea by age-0 Pacific cod. In 4 years of demersal beam trawling on the shelf at depths of 20–146 m, fish were most abundant along the Alaska Peninsula (AKP) at depths to 50 m. In addition, 1 year of spatially intensive beam trawl sampling was conducted at depths of 5–30 m in a nearshore focal area along the central AKP. In this survey, age-0 cod were more abundant along the open coastline than they were in two coastal embayments, counter to patterns observed in the Gulf of Alaska. Demersal sampling in 2012 was conducted synoptically with surveys of surface and subsurface waters over the continental shelf. Age-0 cod were captured in pelagic waters over the middle and outer shelf, with maximum catches occurring over depths of 60–80 m. The similar size distributions of fish in coastal-demersal and shelf-surface habitats and the proximity of concentrations in the two habitat types suggests that habitat use in the Bering Sea occurs along a gradient from coastal to pelagic. While capture efficiencies may differ among trawl types, trawl-based estimates of age-0 cod density in demersal waters along the AKP was 10 times that observed in the highest density pelagic-shelf habitats, demonstrating the importance of coastal nursery habitats in this population. Despite representing a much smaller habitat area, the coastal waters along the AKP appear an important nursery area and support a significant fraction of the age-0 Pacific cod in the Bering Sea.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Malick ◽  
Lewis J. Haldorson ◽  
John J. Piccolo ◽  
Jennifer L. Boldt

<em>Abstract.</em> —To satisfy the essential fish habitat (EFH) mandate of the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are developing objective, generic criteria to describe and identify the essential habitats for their managed species. Summer flounder or fluke <em>Paralichthys dentatus </em> is an important commercial and recreational species that occurs from shallow estuaries to the outer continental shelf from Nova Scotia to Florida. It is most abundant within the Middle Atlantic Bight from New England to Cape Hatteras, and this region is the focus of this paper. Summer flounder make seasonal inshore–offshore migrations; adults and juveniles normally inhabit shallow coastal and estuarine waters during the warmer months of the year and mostly move offshore with declining water temperature and day length during autumn. Adults spawn during the fall and winter migrations. The best habitat information available on summer flounder is for the estuarinedependent transforming larvae and juveniles. They use several different estuarine habitats as nursery areas, including salt-marsh creeks, sea grass beds, mudflats, and open bay areas. In these habitats, water temperature affects the seasonal occurrence of summer flounder, drives the inshore–offshore migration, and, particularly during winter and spring, affects first-year growth and survival and thus subsequent year-class strength. The distribution of transforming larvae and juveniles within the estuaries is significantly influenced by salinity gradients and substrate. Transforming larvae and juveniles show a preference for sandy substrates in the laboratory but also have been captured on mud or mixed substrates. Juveniles are attracted to eelgrass and macroalgae habitats because of the presence of prey but remain in nearby sand to avoid predators as well as conceal themselves from the prey. The MAFMC used the life history and habitat parameter information developed by the NMFS Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) to precisely describe the EFH of summer flounder by life stage. Because summer flounder are overexploited, the MAFMC wanted to be conservative in its EFH identification. Therefore, 90% of the areas where each life history stage has been collected from offshore surveys were identified as EFH. The MAFMC proposed that 100% of the estuaries where larvae and juveniles were identified as being present be identified as EFH because these life stages are estuarine dependent. Nursery habitats within the estuaries are essential because they provide the best conditions for growth and survival of the transforming larvae and juveniles. Submerged aquatic vegetation beds are especially vulnerable and were identified as habitat areas of particular concern. As more habitatrelated density data become available from various local, state, and federal fishery-independent surveys, updated maps of distribution and abundance will be produced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document