Fertility-sparing management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of an institutional series and review of the literature

Author(s):  
Giuseppe Laurelli ◽  
Francesca Falcone ◽  
Cono Scaffa ◽  
Enrico M. Messalli ◽  
Maurizio Del Giudice ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Qiao Wang ◽  
Xia Zhao ◽  
Ping Han

Extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) arising in endometriosis is extremely rare, particularly in the colorectum. It should always be included in the differential diagnosis of primary tumors originating from gastrointestinal tract in females, given that preoperative endoscopical biopsy may reveal no specific changes. We reported a case of ESS arising in colorectal endometriosis and reviewed the previous 7 cases reported in the English literature. Our patient, who was unavailable for tumor resection and refused further adjuvant therapy, played a role in representing the natural history of low-grade extragenital ESS. This case was the only death from ESS arising in colorectal endometriosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianwen Dai ◽  
Baolin Xu ◽  
Huanwen Wu ◽  
Yan You ◽  
Ming Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. Methods Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. Results Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. Conclusion For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 10602-10608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weimin Xie ◽  
Dongyan Cao ◽  
Jiaxin Yang ◽  
Xuan Jiang ◽  
Keng Shen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (Part 2) ◽  
pp. 486-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail A. Delaney ◽  
Ashley L. Gubbels ◽  
Steve Remmenga ◽  
Paul Tomich ◽  
Kelly Molpus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document