Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery at term after cesarean section – a prospective cohort study of the Frankfurt breech at term cohort (FRABAT)

Author(s):  
B. Paul ◽  
CJ Möllmann ◽  
U Kielland-Kaisen ◽  
S Schulze ◽  
W Schaarschmidt ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0202760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Jennewein ◽  
Ulrikke Kielland-Kaisen ◽  
Bettina Paul ◽  
Charlotte J. Möllmann ◽  
Anna-Sophia Klemt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2117
Author(s):  
Lukas Jennewein ◽  
Dörthe Brüggmann ◽  
Kyra Fischer ◽  
Florian J. Raimann ◽  
Hemma Roswitha Pfeifenberger ◽  
...  

Background: Vaginal breech delivery is becoming an extinct art although national guidelines underline its safety and vaginal breech delivery in an upright position has been shown to be a safe birth mode option. In order to spread clinical knowledge and be able to implement vaginal breech delivery into obstetricians’ daily practice, we need to gather knowledge from facilities who teach specialized obstetrical management. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study on 140 vaginal deliveries out of breech presentation solely-managed by seven newly-trained physicians and compared fetal outcome as well as rates of manual assistance in respect to preexisting experience. Results: Fetal morbidity rate measured with a modified PREMODA score was not significantly different in three sub-cohorts sorted by preexisting expertise levels of managing obstetricians (experience groups EG, EG0: 2, 5%; EG1: 3, 7.5%; EG2: 1, 1.7%; p = 0.357). Manual assistance rate was significantly higher in EG1 (low experience level in breech delivery and only in dorsal position) compared to EG0 and EG2 (EG1 28, 70%; EG0: 14, 25%; EG2: 21, 35%; p = 0.0008). Conclusions: Our study shows that vaginal breech delivery with newly-trained obstetricians is a safe option whether or not they have advanced preexisting expertise in breech delivery. These data should encourage implementing vaginal breech delivery in clinical routine.


Author(s):  
Charlotte J. Möllmann ◽  
Ulrikke Kielland-Kaisen ◽  
Bettina Paul ◽  
Sally Schulze ◽  
Lukas Jennewein ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercy A. Nuamah ◽  
Joyce L. Browne ◽  
Alexander V. Öry ◽  
Nelson Damale ◽  
Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thor Haahr ◽  
Tine Dalsgaard Clausen ◽  
Jonathan Thorsen ◽  
Morten A. Rasmussen ◽  
Martin S. Mortensen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad A. Halwani ◽  
Alison E. Turnbull ◽  
Meredith Harris ◽  
Frank Witter ◽  
Trish M. Perl

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The presences of differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primipara who underwent a primary cesarean section and multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible difference in postoperative pain between primipara and multipara. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out, and only women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia were included. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed for all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen, and the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion, and loading dose of 1 mL with a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as visual analogue scale ≥40 during the postoperative 48 hours. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses on postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primipara and 101 multipara) were included. The relative risk for multipara to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primipara. In patients under 30 years old, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain in the multipara was higher than that on the primipara (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P=0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multipara and primipara (33.7%vs.40.2%, P=0.381). No difference was found in PCIA consumption between two groups. (111.1 ± 36.0mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3mL, P=0.979) Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of pain at 4 weeks after the surgery was noted in the primipara compared to the multipara (62.2%vs.37.7%, P=0.011). Conclusions: Multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section have lower risk to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 hours after surgery compared to primipara. While multipara under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain.


Author(s):  
Georgios Chrelias ◽  
Vasilios Pergialiotis ◽  
Maria Oikonomou ◽  
Charalampos Chrelias ◽  
Charalampos Siristatidis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document