scholarly journals Fertility preservation after fertility-sparing surgery in women with borderline ovarian tumours

Author(s):  
S. Khiat ◽  
M. Provansal ◽  
P. Bottin ◽  
J. Saias-Magnan ◽  
C. Metzler-Guillemain ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Daniel Necula ◽  
Daria Istrate ◽  
Jérôme Mathis

AbstractFertility preservation is an important option to consider for young women with low-grade early ovarian cancer. Fertility-sparing surgery (“FSS”) permits the conservation of the uterus and one of the ovaries. This technique is considered safe for stages IA G1, G2 and probably safe for IC G1 epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancers. There are still uncertainties and FSS is not fully accepted for stage IC G1, G2 and clear cell carcinoma. The difficulty in choosing the best option lies in the fact that there is a lack of prospective randomized studies, due to ethical and organizational issues. Retrospective studies and reviews showed reassuring results for FSS in terms of relapse and long term survival. The spontaneous pregnancy rate seems to decrease after FSS, but chemotherapy does not seem to have an impact on fertility rates. Compared with the general population, assisted reproductive techniques are considered safe and with similar fertility results.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Gizzo ◽  
Emanuele Ancona ◽  
Tito Silvio Patrelli ◽  
Carlo Saccardi ◽  
Omar Anis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Delle Marchette ◽  
Lorenzo Ceppi ◽  
Anita Andreano ◽  
Cristina Maria Bonazzi ◽  
Alessandro Buda ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1732-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ouldamer ◽  
S. Bendifallah ◽  
I. Naoura ◽  
G. Body ◽  
C. Uzan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e16-e21
Author(s):  
Waleed M. Etman ◽  
◽  
Mohamed Fathy Abohashim ◽  
Ramadan M. Ali ◽  
Osama Abd-Elaziz ◽  
...  

Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer is increasingly often diagnosed in young females who wish to preserve their fertility. Fertilitypreserving surgeries, where conservation of the uterus and contralateral ovary was performed, might be beneficial for patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer, but their safety is still controversial. In the present study, we aimed to compare radical surgery and fertility-saving surgery in females with stage IA–C epithelial ovarian cancer for recurrence and survival rates, as well as to evaluate reproductive and obstetric outcomes for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer females who were managed with fertility-saving surgery. Materials and methods: We prospectively identified 60 patients aged ≤40 years who were diagnosed with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. The patients in the fertility-preservation group underwent salpingo-oophorectomy on the side of the affected ovary in addition to incisional biopsy or wedge excision of the ovary on the other side. The patients in the radical surgery group underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. We followed up all patients for 5 years to assess their reproductive and oncological outcomes. Results: Patients in the fertility preservation surgery group were significantly younger (30 ± 4 versus 35 ± 5 years) (p < 0.001), their tumor sizes were smaller (3.4 ± 1.3 versus 6.0 ± 2.6 cm) (p < 0.001), of lower grade (p = 0.011), earlier stage (p < 0.001) and had more mucinous histology than patients in the radical surgery group. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding tumor recurrence or survival rates. Of 25 patients who underwent fertility preservation surgery, 18 (72%) attempted to conceive. A total of 15/18 (83%) pregnancies were recorded, including 13 live births, 1 miscarriage, and 1 intrauterine fetal death. Conclusion: Fertility-sparing surgery could be an adequate alternative to radical surgery for young females with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document