Evaluation of Poor-Quality Resection and Anastomotic Failure of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid- and Low-Rectal Adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e86
Author(s):  
Chang-Nam Kim ◽  
Dahn Byun ◽  
Je Ho Jang ◽  
Sang-Jeon Lee ◽  
Moo-Jun Baek
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Jung Lu ◽  
Chien-Hsin Chen ◽  
En-Kwang Lin ◽  
Szu-Yuan Wu

Abstract Purpose: To assess the feasibility and short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery (TaTME-SPLS) for low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma.Methods and materials: A total of 23 patients with clinical stage II-III low-lying (from anal verge 0-8 cm) rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS consecutively from December 2015 to December 2018, were enrolled into our study. Chi-squared testing and Student’s t testing were used to make parametric comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test or the Mann–Whitney U-test were used to make nonparametric comparisons.Results: Conversion rate in patients who underwent neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS was only 4%. The mean operation time was 366 minutes and the inter-sphincter resection (ISR) was done for 14 patients (60%). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested were 15. There was no surgical mortality, but the 30-day morbidity rate was 21% (5 patients were Clavien-Dindo I-II). Pathological complete response was 21.74% with 100% organ preservation and 100% clear distal margin after neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS can be a safe and an effective sphincter-preserving procedure with acceptable morbidity rate for Asian patients with low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1534-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Lee ◽  
Justin Kelly ◽  
George J. Nassif ◽  
Teresa C. deBeche-Adams ◽  
Matthew R. Albert ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1606-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikiforos Ballian ◽  
Brett Yamane ◽  
Glen Leverson ◽  
Bruce Harms ◽  
Charles P. Heise ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-695
Author(s):  
Federica Grosso ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
Valeria Maglione ◽  
Laura Berretta ◽  
Narciso Mariani ◽  
...  

Aim and background Neoadjuvant treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma improves local control and represents the standard for locally advanced disease. Laparoscopic and robotic total mesorectal excision has been increasingly adopted. It provides magnified visualization of the pelvic cavity, thereby facilitating the mesorectal dissection. Methods Consecutive patients with locally advanced/ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant treatment and mini-invasive total mesorectal excision at our center. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records by using a prospectively collected data base and focusing on feasibility, tumor response and treatment outcomes. Results In a 13-year period, 117 rectal adenocarcinoma patients (80 males and 37 females) received neoadjuvant treatment and mini-invasive total mesorectal excision. Median age at diagnosis was 67 years; pre-treatment stage was I in 10 (9%); IIA in 58 (50%); IIC in 5 (4%); IIIA in 10 (9%); IIIB in 31 (26%) and IV in 3 (2%) patients. All patients received external beam radiation therapy, 79 (67%) combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. One-hundred and three patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 14 robotic surgery. Overall, 90 patients (77%) had anterior resection and 27 (23%) had abdominoperineal resection. Down-staging was obtained in 70 patients (66%). No major intraoperative nor delayed surgical complications were observed. At a median follow up of 52 months, 8 patients (7%) had a local relapse, 7 of them along with distant relapse, and 16 (14%) had distant relapse. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 76.5%. Conclusions Our data suggest that in a community hospital mini-invasive surgery after neoadjuvant treatment is feasible in real clinical practice and achieves consistent results in term of disease control rate.


2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. M. J. Peeters ◽  
R. A. E. M. Tollenaar ◽  
C. A. M. Marijnen ◽  
E. Klein Kranenbarg ◽  
W. H. Steup ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document