Hierarchical self-supported Ni(OH)2@Ni12P5 for supercapacitor electrodes with ultra-high area ratio capacitance

2021 ◽  
pp. 139605
Author(s):  
Jiang Liao ◽  
Ao Ju ◽  
Wenhao Jiang ◽  
Yan Ju ◽  
Xueliang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Shane Haydt ◽  
Stephen Lynch ◽  
Scott Lewis

Shaped film cooling holes are used as a cooling technology in gas turbines to reduce metal temperatures and improve durability, and they generally consist of a small metering section connected to a diffuser that expands in one or more directions. The area ratio of these holes is defined as the area at the exit of the diffuser, divided by the area at the metering section. A larger area ratio increases the diffusion of the coolant momentum, leading to lower average momentum of the coolant jet at the exit of the hole and generally better cooling performance. Cooling holes with larger area ratios are also more tolerant of high blowing ratio conditions, and the increased coolant diffusion typically better prevents jet liftoff from occurring. Higher area ratios have traditionally been accomplished by increasing the expansion angle of the diffuser while keeping the overall length of the hole constant. The present study maintains the diffuser expansion angles and instead increases the length of the diffuser, which results in longer holes. Various area ratios have been examined for two shaped holes: one with forward and lateral expansion angles of 7° (7-7-7 hole) and one with forward and lateral expansion angles of 12° (12-12-12 hole). Each hole shape was tested at numerous blowing ratios to capture trends across various flow rates. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements indicate that for the baseline 7-7-7 hole, a larger area ratio provides higher effectiveness, especially at higher blowing ratios. Measurements also indicate that for the 12-12-12 hole, a larger area ratio performs better at high blowing ratios but the hole experiences ingestion at low blowing ratios. Steady RANS simulations did not accurately predict the levels of adiabatic effectiveness, but did predict the trend of improving effectiveness with increasing area ratio for both hole shapes. Flowfield measurements with PIV were also performed at one downstream plane for a low and high area ratio case, and the results indicate an expected decrease in jet velocity due to a larger diffuser.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Schomberg ◽  
J. Olsen ◽  
G. Doig
Keyword(s):  

ARS Journal ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 672-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER T. OLSON
Keyword(s):  

1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 574-578
Author(s):  
C. M. MlHLFEITH ◽  
L. H. SAYER
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yanfeng Zhang ◽  
Shuzhen Hu ◽  
Ali Mahallati ◽  
Xue-Feng Zhang ◽  
Edward Vlasic

The present work, a continuation of a series of investigations on the aerodynamics of aggressive inter-turbine ducts (ITD), is aimed at providing detailed understanding of the flow physics and loss mechanisms in four different ITD geometries. A systematic experimental and computational study was carried out for varying duct mean rise angles and outlet-to-inlet area ratio while keeping the duct length-to-inlet height ratio, Reynolds number and inlet swirl constant in all four geometries. The flow structures within the ITDs were found to be dominated by the counter-rotating vortices and boundary layer separation in both the casing and hub regions. The duct mean rise angle determined the severity of adverse pressure gradient in the casing’s first bend whereas the duct area ratio mainly governed the second bend’s static pressure rise. The combination of upstream wake flow and the first bend’s adverse pressure gradient caused the boundary layer to separate and intensify the strength of counter-rotating vortices. At high mean rise angle, the separation became stronger at the casing’s first bend and moved farther upstream. At high area ratios, a 2-D separation appeared on the casing. Pressure loss penalties increased significantly with increasing duct mean rise angle and area ratio.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 037003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Chen ◽  
Jilei Lin ◽  
Ding Yuan ◽  
Pengliang Ci ◽  
Peisheng Xin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document