Hypoglycaemia unawareness in young people with type 1 diabetes transferred to an adult center

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-400
Author(s):  
Mercé Vidal ◽  
Margarida Jansà ◽  
Daria Roca ◽  
Carmen Yoldi ◽  
Roque Cardona-Hernández ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Idkowiak ◽  
Sabba Elhag ◽  
Vrinda Saraff ◽  
Renuka Dias ◽  
Timothy Barrett ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Kershaw ◽  
Marie Atkins ◽  
Suzanne Digwood ◽  
Hilary McCoubrey ◽  
Marie McGee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerri Erickson ◽  
Donna Freeborn ◽  
Susanne Olsen Roper ◽  
Barbara Mandleco ◽  
Ashley Anderson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110292
Author(s):  
David Tsai ◽  
Jaquelin Flores Garcia ◽  
Jennifer L. Fogel ◽  
Choo Phei Wee ◽  
Mark W. Reid ◽  
...  

Background: Diabetes technologies, such as insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM), have been associated with improved glycemic control and increased quality of life for young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, few young people use these devices, especially those from minority ethnic groups. Current literature predominantly focuses on white patients with private insurance and does not report experiences of diverse pediatric patients with limited resources. Methods: To explore potential differences between Latinx and non-Latinx patients, English- and Spanish-speaking young people with T1D ( n = 173, ages 11-25 years) were surveyed to assess attitudes about and barriers to diabetes technologies using the Technology Use Attitudes and Barriers to Device Use questionnaires. Results: Both English- and Spanish-speaking participants who identified as Latinx were more likely to have public insurance ( P = .0001). English-speaking Latinx participants reported higher Hemoglobin A1c values ( P = .003), less CGM use ( P = .002), and more negative attitudes about technology (generally, P = .003; and diabetes-specific, P < .001) than either non-Latinx or Spanish-speaking Latinx participants. Barriers were encountered with equivalent frequency across groups. Conclusions: Latinx English-speaking participants had less positive attitudes toward general and diabetes technology than Latinx Spanish-speaking and non-Latinx English-speaking peers, and differences in CGM use were associated with socioeconomic status. Additional work is needed to design and deliver diabetes interventions that are of interest to and supportive of patients from diverse ethnic and language backgrounds.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135910452199417
Author(s):  
Rosie Oldham-Cooper ◽  
Claire Semple

There is building evidence that early intervention is key to improving outcomes in eating disorders, whereas a ‘watch and wait’ approach that has been commonplace among GPs and other healthcare professionals is now strongly discouraged. Eating disorders occur at approximately twice the rate in individuals with type 1 diabetes compared to the general population. In this group, standard eating disorder treatments have poorer outcomes, and eating disorders result in a particularly high burden of morbidity. Therefore, our first priority must be prevention, with early intervention where disordered eating has already developed. Clinicians working in both eating disorders and diabetes specialist services have highlighted the need for multidisciplinary team collaboration and specific training, as well as improved treatments. We review the current evidence and future directions for prevention, identification and early intervention for eating disorders in children and young people with type 1 diabetes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document