Electricity capacity investment under risk aversion: A case study of coal, gas, and concentrated solar power

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Fan ◽  
Catherine S. Norman ◽  
Anthony G. Patt
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 5465-5468
Author(s):  
Pengzhu Lin ◽  
Farshad Feyzbar-Khalkhali-Nejad ◽  
Yong Hao ◽  
Tae-Sik Oh

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2402
Author(s):  
Zaharaddeen Ali Hussaini ◽  
Peter King ◽  
Chris Sansom

In power tower systems, the heliostat field is one of the essential subsystems in the plant due to its significant contribution to the plant’s overall power losses and total plant investment cost. The design and optimization of the heliostat field is hence an active area of research, with new field improvement processes and configurations being actively investigated. In this paper, a different configuration of a multi-tower field is explored. This involves adding an auxiliary tower to the field of a conventional power tower Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) system. The choice of the position of the auxiliary tower was based on the region in the field which has the least effective reflecting heliostats. The multi-tower configuration was initially applied to a 50 MWth conventional field in the case study region of Nigeria. The results from an optimized field show a marked increase in the annual thermal energy output and mean annual efficiency of the field. The biggest improvement in the optical efficiency loss factors be seen from the cosine, which records an improvement of 6.63%. Due to the size of the field, a minimal increment of 3020 MWht in the Levelized Cost of Heat (LCOH) was, however, recorded. In much larger fields, though, a higher number of weaker heliostats were witnessed in the field. The auxiliary tower in the field provides an alternate aim point for the weaker heliostat, thereby considerably cutting down on some optical losses, which in turn gives rise to higher energy output. At 400 MWth, the multi-tower field configuration provides a lower LCOH than the single conventional power tower field.


2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 258-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mena ◽  
R. Escobar ◽  
Á. Lorca ◽  
M. Negrete-Pincetic ◽  
D. Olivares

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document