Global association between ambient air pollution and blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 576-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Yi Yang ◽  
Zhengmin Qian ◽  
Steven W. Howard ◽  
Michael G. Vaughn ◽  
Shu-Jun Fan ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Miao Huang ◽  
Jingyuan Chen ◽  
Yiping Yang ◽  
Hong Yuan ◽  
Zhijun Huang ◽  
...  

Background Previous studies have investigated the association of ambient air pollution with blood pressure (BP) in children and adolescents, however, the results are not consistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the relationship between short‐term and long‐term ambient air pollutant exposure with BP values among children and adolescents. Methods and Results We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase before September 6, 2020. Two reviewers independently searched and selected studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The studies were divided into groups by composition of air pollutants (NO 2 , particulate matter (PM) with diameter ≤10 μm or ≤2.5 μm) and length of exposure. The beta regression coefficients (β) and their 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the strength of the effect with each 10 μg/m 3 increase in air pollutants. Out of 36 650 articles, 14 articles were included in this meta‐analysis. The meta‐analysis showed short‐term exposure to PM with diameter ≤10 μm (β=0.267; 95% CI, 0.033‒0.501) was significantly associated with elevated systolic BP values. In addition, long‐term exposure to PM with diameter ≤2.5 μm (β=1.809; 95% CI, 0.962‒2.655), PM with diameter ≤10 μm (β=0.526; 95% CI, 0.095‒0.958), and NO 2 (β=0.754; 95% CI, 0.541‒0.968) were associated with systolic BP values and long‐term exposure to PM with diameter ≤2.5 μm (β=0.931; 95% CI, 0.157‒1.705), and PM with diameter ≤10 μm (β=0.378; 95% CI, 0.022‒0.735) was associated with diastolic BP. Conclusions Our study indicates that both short‐term and long‐term exposure to some ambient air pollutants may increase BP values among children and adolescents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 114999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihan Huang ◽  
Xinyu Zhang ◽  
Jianfeng Huang ◽  
Xiangfeng Lu ◽  
Fangchao Liu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sylvester Dodzi Nyadanu ◽  
Gizachew Assefa Tessema ◽  
Ben Mullins ◽  
Bernard Kumi-Boateng ◽  
Michelle Lee Bell ◽  
...  

Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution and extreme temperatures are among the major risk factors of adverse birth outcomes and with potential long-term effects during the life course. Although low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are most vulnerable, there is limited synthesis of evidence in such settings. This document describes a protocol for both an umbrella review (Systematic Review 1) and a focused systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from LMICs (Systematic Review 2). We will search from start date of each database to present, six major academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE/Ovid, EMBASE/Ovid and Web of Science Core Collection), systematic reviews repositories and references of eligible studies. Additional searches in grey literature will also be conducted. Eligibility criteria include studies of pregnant women exposed to ambient air pollutants and/or extreme temperatures during pregnancy with and without adverse birth outcomes. The umbrella review (Systematic Review 1) will include only previous systematic reviews while Systematic Review 2 will include quantitative observational studies in LMICs. Searches will be restricted to English language using comprehensive search terms to consecutively screen the titles, abstracts and full-texts to select eligible studies. Two independent authors will conduct the study screening and selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction using JBI SUMARI web-based software. Narrative and semi-quantitative syntheses will be employed for the Systematic Review 1. For Systematic Review 2, we will perform meta-analysis with two alternative meta-analytical methods (quality effect and inverse variance heterogeneity) as well as the classic random effect model. If meta-analysis is infeasible, narrative synthesis will be presented. Confidence in cumulative evidence and the strength of the evidence will be assessed. This protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020200387).


2011 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 598-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Vrijheid ◽  
David Martinez ◽  
Sandra Manzanares ◽  
Payam Dadvand ◽  
Anna Schembari ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 1515
Author(s):  
Ikenna Eze* ◽  
Lars Hemkens ◽  
Heiner Bucher ◽  
Barbara Hoffmann ◽  
Christian Schindler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document