Multiple events in the Neo-Tethyan oceanic upper mantle: Evidence from Ru–Os–Ir alloys in the Luobusa and Dongqiao ophiolitic podiform chromitites, Tibet

2007 ◽  
Vol 261 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 33-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rendeng Shi ◽  
Olivier Alard ◽  
Xiachen Zhi ◽  
Suzanne Y. O'Reilly ◽  
Norman J. Pearson ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (18) ◽  
pp. A583 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Shi ◽  
X.C. Zhi ◽  
S.Y. O’Reilly ◽  
W.L. Griffin ◽  
N.J. Pearson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Zhou ◽  
P. T. Robinson ◽  
W. J. Bai

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Shoji Arai

No genetic link between the two main types of chromitite, stratiform and podiform chromitites, has ever been discussed. These two types of chromitite have very different geological contexts; the stratiform one is a member of layered intrusions, representing fossil magma chambers, in the crust, and the podiform one forms pod-like bodies, representing fossil magma conduits, in the upper mantle. Chromite grains contain peculiar polymineralic inclusions derived from Na-bearing hydrous melts, whose features are so similar between the two types that they may form in a similar fashion. The origin of the chromite-hosted inclusions in chromitites has been controversial but left unclear. The chromite-hosted inclusions also characterize the products of the peridotite–melt reaction or melt-assisted partial melting, such as dunites, troctolites and even mantle harzburgites. I propose a common origin for the inclusion-bearing chromites, i.e., a reaction between the mantle peridotite and magma. Some of the chromite grains in the stratiform chromitite originally formed in the mantle through the peridotite–magma reaction, possibly as loose-packed young podiform chromitites, and were subsequently disintegrated and transported to a crustal magma chamber as suspended grains. It is noted, however, that the podiform chromitites left in the mantle beneath the layered intrusions are different from most of the podiform chromitites now exposed in the ophiolites.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Piotr Gulgowski

Abstract Singular nouns in the scope of a distributive operator have been shown to be treated as conceptually plural (Patson and Warren, 2010). The source of this conceptual plurality is not fully clear. In particular, it is not known whether the concept of plurality associated with a singular noun originates from distributing over multiple objects or multiple events. In the present experiment, iterative expressions (distribution over events) were contrasted with collective and distributive sentences using a Stroop-like interference technique (Berent, Pinker, Tzelgov, Bibi, and Goldfarb, 2005; Patson and Warren, 2010). A trend in the data suggests that event distributivity does not elicit a plural interpretation of a grammatically singular noun, however the results were not statistically significant. Possible causes of the non-significant results are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document