Two-sided matching decision making with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and incomplete criteria weight information

2020 ◽  
pp. 114311
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Junliang Gao ◽  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Wenyu Yu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: An outranking approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jian-qiang Wang ◽  
Hong-yu Zhang ◽  
Xiao-hong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

scholarly journals A BI-OBJECTIVE SCORE-VARIANCE BASED LINEAR ASSIGNMENT METHOD FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH HESITANT FUZZY LINGUISTIC TERM SETS

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1125-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein RAZAVI HAJIAGHA ◽  
Meisam SHAHBAZI ◽  
Hannan AMOOZAD MAHDIRAJI ◽  
Hossein PANAHIAN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Assignment Method ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Individual Evaluation ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic ◽  
Linear Assignment

Decision makers usually prefer to express their preferences by linguistic variables. Classic fuzzy sets allowed expressing these preferences using a single linguistic value. Considering inevitable hesitancy of decision makers, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets allowed them to express individual evaluation using several linguistic values. Therefore, these sets improve the ability of humans to determine believes using their own language. Considering this feature, in this paper a method upon linear assignment method is proposed to solve group decision making problems using this kind of information, when criteria weights are known or unknown. The performance of the proposed method is illustrated in a numerical example and the results are compared with other methods to delineate the models efficiency. Following a logical and well-known mathematical logic along with simplicity of execution are the main advantages of the proposed method.

A Framework for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Using Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Krishankumar ◽  
L. S. Subrajaa ◽  
K. S. Ravichandran ◽  
Samarjit Kar ◽  
Arsham Borumand Saeid
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

A Novel Linguistic Group Decision-Making Model Based on Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 379-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuiping Wei ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
Xijin Tang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Distance Measures ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Linguistic Group ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS) is a set with ordered consecutive linguistic terms, and is very useful in addressing the situations where people are hesitant in providing their linguistic assessments. Wang [H. Wang, Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their aggregation in group decision making, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 8(1) (2015) 14–33.] removed the consecutive condition to introduce the notion of extended HFLTS (EHFLTS). The generalized form has wider applications in linguistic group decision-making. By introducing distance measures for EHFLTSs, in this paper we develop a novel multi-criteria group decision making model to deal with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. The model collects group linguistic information by using EHFLTSs and avoids the possible loss of information. Moreover, it can assess the importance weights of criteria according to their subjective and objective information and rank alternatives based on the rationale of TOPSIS. In order to illustrate the applicability of the proposed algorithm, two examples are given and comparisons are made with the other existing methods.

scholarly journals A Novel Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method Based on The Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Generalized Power Aggregation Operator

Information ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu ◽  
Zhao ◽  
Li ◽  
Wang ◽  
Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Linguistic Context ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Linguistic Expression ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

. A double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLT) is deemed as an effective and powerful linguistic expression which models complex linguistic decision information more accurately by using two different hierarchy linguistic term sets. The purpose of this paper is to propose a multi-attribute decision making method to tackle complex decision issues in which attribute values are represented as double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers, and there are some extreme or unreasonable data in the attribute values. To do this, firstly, four double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic generalized power aggregation operators are introduced, including the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic generalized power average (DHHFLGPA) operator, the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic generalized power geometric (DHHFLGPG) operator, and their weighted forms. Thereafter, several favorable properties, as well as representative cases of the proposed operators, are investigated in detail. Moreover, by virtue of the proposed operators, a novel approach is developed for coping with multi-attribute decision making cases in the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic context. Finally, an illustrated example is given to demonstrate the practical application of the presented approach, an availability verification is given to show its validity, and a comparative analysis is also conducted to highlight the advantages of the proposed approach.

scholarly journals Sustainable Construction Supplier Selection by a Multiple Criteria Decision-making Method with Hesitant Linguistic Information

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-136
Author(s):  
Huchang Liao ◽  
Ruxue Ren ◽  
Jurgita Antucheviciene ◽  
Jonas Šaparauskas ◽  
Abdullah Al-Barakati
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Sustainable Construction ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Within the context of resource constraints and ecological environment imbalance, the adoption of green suppliers can help construction enterprises achieve sustainable development and improve their competitiveness. The selection of sustainable construction suppliers is a multi-criteria decision-making problem since multiple factors should be considered. The increasingly complex decision-making environment makes it difficult for evaluators to give accurate evaluation values. In this regard, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is a qualitative evaluation tool to represent the comprehensive linguistic evaluation values of experts by considering the hesitancy behaviors of experts. In this paper, a scientific multi-criteria decision-making model based on the improved Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method and the double normalization-based multi-aggregation (DNMA) method in the hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment is proposed. A new distance measure is proposed to measure the differences between hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with different lengths without changing the original evaluation information of experts. The proposed distance measure is applied to the proposed multi-criteria decision-making model. After improving the calculation steps of the traditional SWARA method, we can determine the weights of criteria effectively through our proposed model. To verify the applicability of the proposed method, we implement it to select sustainable building suppliers. The effectiveness of the method is verified by sensitivity analysis. We also compare the results obtained by our method and those derived by the Weight Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment (WASPAS) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The proposed method have a strong applicability to solve the sustainability-related decision problems given that it can effectively determine the weights of criteria and flexibly meet the needs of decision-makers by adjusting the coefficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document