A Novel Linguistic Group Decision-Making Model Based on Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 379-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuiping Wei ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
Xijin Tang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Distance Measures ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Linguistic Group ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS) is a set with ordered consecutive linguistic terms, and is very useful in addressing the situations where people are hesitant in providing their linguistic assessments. Wang [H. Wang, Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their aggregation in group decision making, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 8(1) (2015) 14–33.] removed the consecutive condition to introduce the notion of extended HFLTS (EHFLTS). The generalized form has wider applications in linguistic group decision-making. By introducing distance measures for EHFLTSs, in this paper we develop a novel multi-criteria group decision making model to deal with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. The model collects group linguistic information by using EHFLTSs and avoids the possible loss of information. Moreover, it can assess the importance weights of criteria according to their subjective and objective information and rank alternatives based on the rationale of TOPSIS. In order to illustrate the applicability of the proposed algorithm, two examples are given and comparisons are made with the other existing methods.

Group Decision Making Method Based on Composite Linguistic Expressions

2014 ◽  
Vol 1049-1050 ◽  
pp. 1281-1286
Author(s):  
Wen Zhan Dai ◽  
Yun Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Traditional Use ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
The One ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic ◽  
Context Free

When decision makers are hesitant among different linguistic terms, the traditional use of one single linguistic term will restrict the accuracy of personal preference expressed by experts, it is necessary to use composite linguistic term which contains both the one single linguistic terms and the comparative linguistic expressions. Firstly, with the use of context-free grammars, two-tuple linguistic representation model and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, the linguistic expressions of the preference relations provided by experts are transformed into judgment matrix, then the suitable aggregation operators will be selected to obtain a best solution to the problem. Finally, a new group decision making model based on composite linguistic expressions has been proposed and a practical example has been analyzed to verify the reasonability and feasibility of the approach.

Distance-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approaches with Multi-Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
pp. 1069-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jian-Qiang Wang ◽  
Hong-Yu Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Hong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Linguistic Distance ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Set Operations ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Linguistic Scale Function ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

In this paper, the distance-based multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) approaches using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (MHFLTSs) are proposed. MHFLTSs can contain nonconsecutive and repetitive linguistic terms, so as to deal with repeated linguistic values in group decision-making. A multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic term element (MHFLTE) can be produced by collecting the evaluation values of several decision-makers or given by one person who has uncertainty in evaluation. The corresponding set operations and comparison rules are defined and the generalized hesitant fuzzy linguistic distance for MHFLTEs is given based on the linguistic scale function. Then this distance is embedded into the TOPSIS, VIKOR and TODIM approaches for the purpose of solving multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems in the context of multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. With increasing concerns about deterioration in environment, organizations are obliged to carry out more environmental sustainable activities than before, such as progressive practices in green supply chain management (GSCM). Therefore, with respect to the application of MHFLTSs in GSCM, two illustrations for evaluating the related alternatives are finally provided, together with the sensitivity and comparison analysis, to show the validity and effectiveness of our proposal.

scholarly journals Probabilistic Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1932
Author(s):  
You Peng ◽  
Yifang Tao ◽  
Boyi Wu ◽  
Xiaoxin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Technology Selection ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Operational Laws ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Correlation Measures ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) is widely applied to various areas for solving real-life problems, including technology selection, credit assessment, strategic planning evaluation, supplier selection, etc. To describe the complex and imprecise cognition, it is more convenient to provide the decision-making information in linguistic terms rather than concrete numerical values. Thus, several linguistic models, such as the fuzzy linguistic approach (FLA), hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs), hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets (HIFLTSs), and probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTS) have been proposed successively. Due to the flexibility and comprehensiveness of PLTS, it has aroused growing concern. However, it also has a big limitation of requiring the membership degree to be 1 by default, and it does not consider the degree of non-membership and hesitancy of a linguistic variable. Therefore, the probabilistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets (PHIFLTSs) have been presented to extend the PLTS by combining the membership and non-membership in symmetry to depict the evaluation of the experts. To overcome the existing shortcomings and enrich the methodology framework of PHIFLTSs, some novel operational laws are defined to extend the applicability and methodology of the PHIFLTSs in MAGDM. Furthermore, the distance and correlation measures for the PHIFLTSs are improved to make up the shortage of the current distance measures. In addition, the unbalanced linguistic terms are taken into account to represent the cognitive complex information of experts. At last, a MAGDM model based on the multiplicative multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis (MULTIMOORA) approach with the use of the developed novel operational laws and correlation measures is presented, which results in more accuracy and effectiveness. A real-word application example is presented to demonstrate the working of the proposed methodology. Moreover, a thorough comparison is done with related existing works in order to show the validity of this methodology.

scholarly journals A CONSENSUS MODEL FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS WITH UNBALANCED FUZZY LINGUISTIC INFORMATION

2009 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 109-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. CABRERIZO ◽  
S. ALONSO ◽  
E. HERRERA-VIEDMA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Consensus Model ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Linguistic Methodology ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Proximity Measures ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Most group decision making (GDM) problems based on linguistic approaches use symmetrically and uniformly distributed linguistic term sets to express experts' opinions. However, there exist problems whose assessments need to be represented by means of unbalanced linguistic term sets, i.e. using term sets that are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed. The aim of this paper is to present a consensus model for GDM problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. This consensus model is based on both a fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets and two consensus criteria, consensus degrees, and proximity measures. To do so, we use a new fuzzy linguistic methodology improving another approach to manage unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information,1 (Int. J. Intell. Syst.22(11) (2007) 1197–1214), which uses the linguistic 2-tuple model as representation base of unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. In addition, the consensus model presents a feedback mechanism to help experts for reaching the highest degree of consensus possible. There are two main advantages provided by this consensus model. First, its ability to cope with GDM problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information overcoming the problem of finding different discrimination levels in linguistic term sets. Second, it supports the consensus process automatically, avoiding the possible subjectivity that the moderator can introduce in this phase.

scholarly journals Uncertain Linguistic Aggregation Distance Measures and Their Application to Group Decision Making

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
Shouzhen Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Distance Measures ◽  
University Faculty ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Weighted Distance ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Decision Making Problem

We introduce a method based on distance measures for group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. We develop some uncertain linguistic aggregation distance measures called the uncertain linguistic weighted distance (ULWD) measure, the uncertain linguistic ordered weighted distance (ULOWD) measure, and the uncertain linguistic hybrid weighted distance (ULHWD) measure. We study some of their characteristic, and we prove that the ULWD and the ULOWD are special cases of the ULHWD measure. Finally, we develop an application of the ULHWD measure in a group decision making problem concerning the evaluation of university faculty for tenure and promotion with uncertain linguistic information.

Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3037-3050 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Cabrerizo ◽  
R. Al-Hmouz ◽  
A. Morfeq ◽  
A. S. Balamash ◽  
M. A. Martínez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

scholarly journals A BI-OBJECTIVE SCORE-VARIANCE BASED LINEAR ASSIGNMENT METHOD FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH HESITANT FUZZY LINGUISTIC TERM SETS

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1125-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein RAZAVI HAJIAGHA ◽  
Meisam SHAHBAZI ◽  
Hannan AMOOZAD MAHDIRAJI ◽  
Hossein PANAHIAN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Assignment Method ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Individual Evaluation ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic ◽  
Linear Assignment

Decision makers usually prefer to express their preferences by linguistic variables. Classic fuzzy sets allowed expressing these preferences using a single linguistic value. Considering inevitable hesitancy of decision makers, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets allowed them to express individual evaluation using several linguistic values. Therefore, these sets improve the ability of humans to determine believes using their own language. Considering this feature, in this paper a method upon linear assignment method is proposed to solve group decision making problems using this kind of information, when criteria weights are known or unknown. The performance of the proposed method is illustrated in a numerical example and the results are compared with other methods to delineate the models efficiency. Following a logical and well-known mathematical logic along with simplicity of execution are the main advantages of the proposed method.

A Framework for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Using Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Krishankumar ◽  
L. S. Subrajaa ◽  
K. S. Ravichandran ◽  
Samarjit Kar ◽  
Arsham Borumand Saeid
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document