Correlation Between Primary Hypospadias Repair and Subsequent Urethral Strictures in a Series of 408 Adult Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Barbagli ◽  
Nicola Fossati ◽  
Alessandro Larcher ◽  
Francesco Montorsi ◽  
Salvatore Sansalone ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Hung Tang ◽  
Clarisa C. Hammer ◽  
Leo Doumanian ◽  
Richard A. Santucci

Background. Adult patients with urethral stricture after childhood hypospadias surgeries are infrequently discussed in the literature. We report our experience in treating such patients.Materials and Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed. From 2002 through 2007, nine consecutive adult patients who had current urethral stricture and had undergone childhood hypospadias surgeries were included. All adult urethral strictures were managed by a single surgeon.Results. Mean patient age was 38.9 years old. The lag time of urethral stricture presentation ranged from 25 to 57 years after primary hypospadias surgery, with an average of 36 years. Stricture length ranged from 1 to 17 cm (mean: 10.3 cm). Open graft-based urethroplasties were performed in 4/9 cases. Salvage perineal urethrostomy was performed in 2/9 cases. Another 3 cases chose to undergo repeat urethrotomy or dilatations—none of these patients was cured by such treatment. Complications included one urethrostomy stenosis and one urinary tract infection.Conclusion. Urethral stricture may occur decades after initial hypospadias surgery. It can be the most severe form of anterior urethral stricture, and may eventually require salvage treatment such as a perineal urethrostomy. Patients undergoing hypospadias surgery should receive lifelong follow-up protocol to detect latent urethral strictures.


2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 409-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricio C Gargollo ◽  
Amanda W Cai ◽  
David A Diamond ◽  
Bartley G Cilento ◽  
James Mandell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gomella ◽  
Logan Hubbard ◽  
Hong Truong ◽  
Bradley Figler

1998 ◽  
pp. 170-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
BARRY P. DUEL ◽  
JULIA SPENCER BARTHOLD ◽  
RICARDO GONZALEZ

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro A. Saavedra ◽  
Keith F. Rourke

Introduction: Urethral stricture is one of the most commonly encountered complications after hypospadias repair but remains poorly described. The aim of this study is to better characterize hypospadias-associated urethral strictures (HAUS) and treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 84 patients who underwent urethroplasty (UP) for HAUS from 2003–2017. Patients were characterized with regard to demographics, stricture length, location, concurrent pathology, previous surgery, type of urethroplasty, 90-day complications, and surgical success defined as the absence of stricture on cystoscopy. Univariate and survival multivariate analysis was performed. Results: Overall success was 88.1% at a mean followup of 19 months, with a 90-day complication rate of 9.5%, a 21.4% rate of urethrocutaneous fistula requiring a mean of 1.4 surgeries. Patients were categorized into one of four groups based on stricture length, location, and number of previous procedures: group 1 (66.7%) – previous failed hypospadias repair (HR) with stricture involving the entire repair; group 2 (7.1%) – “junctional stricture” at the junction of the “neourethra” and native urethra; group 3 (11.9%) – isolated bulbar stricture outside the repaired urethra; group 4 (14.3%) – urethral stricture in untreated hypospadias. Despite differing by technique (p<0.0001), stricture length (p=0.02), location (p<0.001), and number of previous repairs (p<0.001), groups did not significantly differ by success (p=0.82), complications (p=0.16), or urethrocutaneous fistula (p=0.19), whereas individual techniques did. Conclusions: UP for HAUS is often successful but patients frequently require more than one operation and have a significant risk of associated complications. Despite a broad spectrum of presentation, patients can often be categorized into one of four groups, which can help direct decision-making and obtain similar outcomes regardless of baseline differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document