scholarly journals Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunan Sujenthiran ◽  
Pieter Jan Elshout ◽  
Erik Veskimae ◽  
Steven MacLennan ◽  
Yuhong Yuan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sujenthiran ◽  
P.J. Elshout ◽  
E. Veskimae ◽  
Y. Abu-Ghanem ◽  
S. MacLennan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 294.e1-294.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.K. Au ◽  
X. Tan ◽  
M. Sidani ◽  
I. Stanasel ◽  
D.R. Roth ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Umbreit ◽  
Jonathan C. Routh ◽  
Douglas A. Husmann

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. May ◽  
Oussama Darwish ◽  
Brian Dang ◽  
John J. Monda ◽  
Prajakta Adsul ◽  
...  

Current management of high-grade blunt renal trauma favors a nonoperative approach when possible. We performed a retrospective study of high grade blunt renal injuries at our level I trauma center to determine the indications and success of nonoperative management (NOM). 47 patients with blunt grade IV or V injuries were identified between October 2004 and December 2013. Immediate operative patients (IO) were compared to nonoperatively managed (NOM). Of the 47 patients, 3 (6.4%) were IO and 44 (95.6%) NOM. IO patients had a higher heart rate on admission, 133 versus 100 in NOM (P=0.01). IO patients had a higher rate of injury to the renal vein or artery (100%) compared to NOM group (18%) (P=0.01). NOM failed in 3 of 44 patients (6.8%). Two required nonemergent nephrectomy and one required emergent exploration resulting in nephrectomy. Six NOM patients had kidney-related complications (13.6%). The renal salvage rate for the entire cohort was 87.2% and 93.2% for NOM. Nonoperative management for hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt renal trauma is safe with a low risk of complications. Management decisions should consider hemodynamic status and visualization of active renal bleeding as well as injury grade in determining operative management.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1127-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Mingoli ◽  
Marco La Torre ◽  
Emanuele Migliori ◽  
Bruno Cirillo ◽  
Martina Zambon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Wai Lin Thein ◽  
Aung Tun ◽  
Elizabeth Guevara ◽  
Aymen Elfiky ◽  
James Gasperino

125 Background: RCTs have tested the role of adding immunotherapy to standard therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first-line setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the efficacy and toxicity of adding immunotherapy in this patient population. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using PUBMED, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases through October 1, 2018. RCTs of first-line standard therapy +/- immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC were incorporated in the analysis. A generic inverse variance method was used to calculate the estimated pooled Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The mantel-haenszel method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for pooled overall response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events (AEs), and high-grade AEs (≥grade 3). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q-statistic. Random effects were used due to significant heterogeneity among studies. Results: Three phase 2 & 3 RCTs (Keynote – 021,189 and IMpower – 150) including 1431 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients were included in the analysis. Keynote 021 & 189 trials did not allow patients with EGFR or ALK mutations, while IMpower 150 trial allowed EGFR or ALK mutations. The study arm used standard regimens in combination with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab while control arm used only standard regimens. The pooled HR for PFS was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.5-0.65; P=0.00001), the pooled HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43-0.87; P=0.006), and the pooled RR for ORR was 1.83 (95 CI: 1.13-2.95; P=0.01). The pooled RRs for all-grade AEs and high-grade AEs were 1 (95% CI: 0.99-1.02; P=0.48) and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.97-1.28; P=0.14), respectively. Conclusions: Pooled data showed significant improvement in PFS, OS & ORR with chemo-immunotherapy compared to the standard treatment regimen for the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. There was no increase in the risk of all-grade and high-grade AEs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 57-58
Author(s):  
John B. Malcolm ◽  
Reza Mehrazin ◽  
Christopher J. DiBlasio ◽  
David D. Vance ◽  
Robert W. Wake ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document