Splitting and Lumping Adult Renal Epithelial Tumors Can Help the Urologists in the Prognostic Risk Stratification and in the Treatment Decision-Making

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 676-680
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Ficarra ◽  
Ziya Kirkali ◽  
Hein Van Poppel
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 265-265
Author(s):  
David Michael Gill ◽  
David D. Stenehjem ◽  
Heather H. Cheng ◽  
Elizabeth Riley Kessler ◽  
Andrew W. Hahn ◽  
...  

265 Background: Few objective criteria are considered for risk stratification for treatment decision making in men with new mHSPC. Time between DT for localized disease, and start of ADT for new mHSPC may predict response to ADT, and prognosticate outcomes in this setting. Methods: In this multicenter study, men with newly diagnosed mHSPC with prior history of definite therapy for localized prostate cancer were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods assessed time to castration resistance (CRPC) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of ADT, and correlated with the time elapsed from DT to initiation of ADT for new mHSPC. Results: A total of 112 men with new mHSPC initiating ADT, with prior definitive therapy were eligible (all median: age 68 yrs, Gleason score 7, PSA 14 ng/ml, ECOG 0, median time from DT to start of ADT for new mHSPC 54 months). In the univariate analysis, time from DT to start of ADT of < 60 months vs ≥ 60 months significantly correlated with duration of response to ADT and outcomes (Table). After adjustment for Gleason score and log PSA, time from DT to start of ADT for new mHSPC (<60 vs ≥60 months) remained an independent and a significant predictor of time to CRPC (HR 1.92 95% CI 1.02-3.90, p=0.044), and showed trends towards predicting OS (HR 1.77 95% CI 0.60-6.19, p=0.33). Conclusions: Time from DT for localized prostate cancer to initiation of ADT for new mHSPC independently predicts response to ADT, and may aid in risk stratification for treatment decision making in men with new mHSPC. These hypothesis-generating data require validation in a larger cohort. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. O'Brien ◽  
Timothy Whelan ◽  
Amiram Gafni ◽  
Cathy Charles ◽  
Peter Ellis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document