Retrosigmoid Versus Traditional Ileal Conduit for Urinary Diversion After Radical Cystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Ficarra ◽  
Gianluca Giannarini ◽  
Alessandro Crestani ◽  
Vito Palumbo ◽  
Marta Rossanese ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihion Yu ◽  
Bumsik Hong ◽  
Jun-Young Park ◽  
Yongsoo Lee ◽  
Jai-Hyun Hwang ◽  
...  

Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy is associated with a risk of renal function impairment. A significant decline in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (i.e., a ≥30% decline in baseline GFR after 12 months) is associated with long-term renal function impairment. We compared the significant GFR decline between ileal conduit and ileal neobladder urinary diversions 12 months after radical cystectomy. We retrospectively included radical cystectomy patients. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of a significant GFR decline in ileal conduit urinary diversion (ileal conduit group) and ileal neobladder urinary diversion (ileal neobladder group) 12 months after radical cystectomy. The secondary outcomes were the change of GFR and the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the two groups. After propensity score matching, the ileal conduit and neobladder groups had 117 patients each. The incidence of a significant GFR decline was not significantly different between ileal conduit and ileal neobladder groups (12.0% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.845). The change of GFR and ESRD incidence were not significantly different between the two groups (−8.4% vs. −9.7%, p = 0.480; 4.3% vs. 5.1%, p > 0.999, respectively). These results can provide important information on appropriate selection of the urinary diversion type in radical cystectomy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
Cedomir Topuzovic ◽  
Tomislav Pejcic ◽  
Ljubomir Djurasic ◽  
Jovan Hadzi-Djokic

INTRODUCTION: Ileal conduit (IC) is the standard urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. The formation of stone in the IC is one of the relatively common late complications of the procedure. CASE REPORT: The case of 69-year-old man who developed 10-cm large stone in the IC, six years after cystectomy is presented. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with the stone in IC can be treated with minimally invasive techniques, like manual extraction, or endoscopic procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document