scholarly journals How are combinations of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep related to cognitive function in older adults? A systematic review

2022 ◽  
pp. 111698
Author(s):  
Maddison L. Mellow ◽  
Alyson J. Crozier ◽  
Dorothea Dumuid ◽  
Alexandra T. Wade ◽  
Mitchell R. Goldsworthy ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maddison L Mellow ◽  
Alyson J Crozier ◽  
Dorothea Dumuid ◽  
Alexandra T Wade ◽  
Mitchell R Goldsworthy ◽  
...  

AbstractThe relationships between cognitive function and each of physical activity, sleep and sedentary behaviour in older adults are well documented. However, these three “time use” behaviours are co-dependent parts of the 24-hour day (spending time in one leaves less time for the others), and their best balance for cognitive function in older adults is still largely unknown. This systematic review summarises the existing evidence on the associations between combinations of two or more time-use behaviours and cognitive function in older adults. Embase, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Medline and Emcare databases were searched in March 2020 and updated in May 2021, returning a total of 25,289 papers for screening. A total of 23 studies were included in the synthesis, spanning >23,000 participants (mean age 71 years). Findings support previous evidence that spending more time in physical activity and limiting sedentary behaviour is broadly associated with better cognitive outcomes in older adults. Higher proportions of moderate-vigorous physical activity in the day were most frequently associated with better cognitive function. Some evidence suggests that certain types of sedentary behaviour may be positively associated with cognitive function, such as reading or computer use. Sleep duration appears to share an inverted U-shaped relationship with cognition, as too much or too little sleep is negatively associated with cognitive function. This review highlights considerable heterogeneity in methodological and statistical approaches, and encourages a more standardised, transparent approach to capturing important daily behaviours in older adults. Investigating all three time-use behaviours together against cognitive function using suitable statistical methodology is strongly recommended to further our understanding of optimal 24-hour time-use for brain function in aging.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Antonio Henrique Germano-Soares ◽  
Ozeas Lima Lins-Filho ◽  
Caroline Ramos de Moura Silva ◽  
José Francisco Silva ◽  
Carla Menêses Hardman ◽  
...  

Recent systematic reviews highlighted important relationships between combinations of movement behaviors (ie. sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity) and health outcomes among children and adolescents. However, it is unclear whether similar relationships occur in older adults. Therefore, the purpose of this protocol was to describe the aims and methods for a systematic review to summarize the studies examining the relationships between movement behaviors and health outcomes in older adults. A systematic review will be developed based on searches of articles in seven electronic databases and references of retrieved articles, contact with authors, and study repositories. Eligibility criteria: observational or experimental studies examining the association of at least two movement behaviours (sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity) with health outcomes in older adults (≥60 years old). Selection of the studies and extraction of the data will be carried out by two reviewers independently. Characteristics of the study, participants, methods of combinations, and main results will be extracted and described. Risk of bias and level of evidence in the studies will be assessed according to the study quality tool of the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the GRADE guidelines. The data will be synthesized using random effects meta-analysis for results that are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. If not, then a narrative synthesis will be conducted. The results of this review may provide insights to improve current guidelines on 24-hour cycle in older adults, as well as guide future studies in this research field. 


Author(s):  
Anna G.M. Rojer ◽  
Keenan A. Ramsey ◽  
Elvira S. Amaral Gomes ◽  
Luke D’Andrea ◽  
Christopher Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document