Extended embryo culture (Blast): superior live birth rates (LBR) with small increased risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes as compared to cleavage stage transfers

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. S141
Author(s):  
M.D. Werner ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
E.J. Forman ◽  
K.H. Hong ◽  
T.A. Molinaro ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sainte-Rose ◽  
C. Petit ◽  
L. Dijols ◽  
C. Frapsauce ◽  
F. Guerif

AbstractThe aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of extended embryo culture in advanced maternal age (AMA) patients (37–43 years). In this retrospective analysis, 21,301 normally fertilized zygotes from 4952 couples were cultured until the blastocyst stage. Blastocyst development, including kinetics and morphology, transfer rate, implantation and live birth rates, were measured. In AMA patients, the blastocyst rate was significantly decreased as compared to that in younger women. On day 5, blastocysts underwent growth retardation in AMA patients, which was highlighted by a decreased rate of full/expanded blastocysts. Organization of the cells (trophectoderm and inner cell mass) was unaffected by age. However, in AMA patients, a ‘good’ morphology blastocyst had a decreased probability to implant compared with an ‘average’ morphology blastocyst in younger women. While the rates of blastocyst transfer and useful blastocysts were similar to younger patients, in AMA patients, both implantation and live birth rates were significantly reduced. Our results support the idea that extended embryo culture is not harmful for AMA patients. However, embryo selection allowed by such culture is not powerful enough to avoid chromosomal abnormalities in the developed blastocysts and therefore cannot compensate for the effect of a woman’s age.


2007 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. S317
Author(s):  
E.G. Papanikolaou ◽  
E. Kolibianakis ◽  
C. Venetis ◽  
H. Tournaye ◽  
B. Tarlatzis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aafke P A Van Montfoort ◽  
Eus G J M Arts ◽  
Lydia Wijnandts ◽  
Alexander Sluijmer ◽  
Marie-José Pelinck ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do different oxygen levels during human IVF embryo culture affect embryo utilization, cumulative IVF success rates per cycle and neonatal birthweight? SUMMARY ANSWER After 2 days of culture, a lower oxygen level (5%) leads to more good-quality embryos and more embryos that can be cryopreserved, and thereby to a higher cumulative live birth rate per cycle when compared to embryo culture in 20% oxygen, while birthweights are similar. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several studies have compared IVF outcome parameters after embryo culture in a more physiological level of 5% oxygen and the atmospheric level of 20%. Although there is consensus that embryo development improves in 5% oxygen, effects on pregnancy and live birth rates are mainly seen in blastocyst, but not cleavage-stage transfers. A major drawback of these studies is that only fresh embryo transfers were included, not taking additional frozen-thawed transfers from these cycles into account. This might have underestimated the effects of oxygen level, especially in cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Furthermore, little is known about the effect of oxygen level during culture on birthweight. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a cohort study in 871 consecutive patients who had an IVF cycle between January 2012 and December 2013, and 5–7 years follow-up to allow transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. Based on daily availability of positions in the incubators, all oocytes and embryos of one cycle were allocated to one of the three incubators with traditional ambient oxygen levels (6% CO2 and 20% O2 in air), or to a fourth incubator that was adjusted to have low oxygen levels of 5% (6% CO2, 5% O2 and 89% N2). Embryos were cultured under 5 or 20% oxygen until Day 2 or 3, when embryos were transferred or cryopreserved, respectively. Clinical and other laboratory procedures were similar in both groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS To compare embryo characteristics and (cumulative) pregnancy outcomes between the two oxygen groups, for each patient only the first cycle in the study period was included in the analysis, resulting in 195 cycles in the 5% group (1627 oocytes) and 676 in the 20% oxygen group (5448 oocytes). Embryo characteristics were analysed per cycle and per embryo and were corrected for maternal age, cycle rank order, fertilization method (IVF or ICSI) and cause of subfertility. Perinatal data from the resulting singletons (n = 124 after fresh and 45 after frozen-thawed embryo transfer) were collected from delivery reports from the hospitals or midwife practices. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the 5% oxygen group, there were significantly more embryos of good quality (45.8 versus 30.9% in the 20% group, adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 1.9 [1.6–2.4]). This did not result in higher live birth rates per cycle, but after fresh transfers more good-quality spare embryos could be cryopreserved (46.1 versus 29.7%, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.0 [1.7–2.5]). After a follow-up period of 5–7 years, in which 82.4% of the cryopreserved embryos from the 5% oxygen group and 85.4% from the 20% oxygen group were thawed, the percentage of patients with at least one live birth resulting from the study cycle was significantly higher in the low oxygen group (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.5 [1.01–2.2]). In 124 live born singletons from fresh embryo transfers and in 45 from transfers of cryopreserved embryos, birthweight was similar in both oxygen groups after correction for confounding factors. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective study, and treatment allocation was not randomised. The study was not powered for a predefined birthweight difference. With the number of live births in our study, small differences in birthweight might not have been detected. The selection of embryos to be cryopreserved was based on embryo morphology criteria that might be different in other clinics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Improved embryo utilization by more cryopreservation leading to higher cumulative live birth rates per cycle favours the use of 5% instead of 20% oxygen during human IVF embryo culture. This study also demonstrates that for comparison of different IVF treatment regimens, the cumulative outcome, including transfers of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, is to be preferred instead of analysis of fresh embryo transfers only. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received for this study. None of the authors has a conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pujol ◽  
O Cairó ◽  
T Mukan ◽  
V Pérez ◽  
D García ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Is it possible to define a personalized ET model to maximize the chance of live birth (LB) while minimizing the risk of twin pregnancy? Summary answer A model including age and embryo morphological score can inform a personalized ET strategy to maximize LB while minimizing the risk of twin pregnancy. What is known already The morphological score of the transferred embryos affects pregnancy (PR) and LB rates in IVF cycles. Although SET is mainly recommended to avoid multiple pregnancies, DET is still being performed extensively, especially in patients with poor prognosis, with the aim to improve PR per transfer and shorten time to pregnancy. While twin pregnancies are associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications, very low PR may increase patient drop-off, extend time to pregnancy, and increase the cost per successful transfer. A personalized transfer strategy balancing high LB per transfer with low twin pregnancy rates should be defined. Study design, size, duration Retrospective study including 2,470 fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ET) of either one or two embryos at D3 from January 2016 to August 2019 in a single IVF clinic. Biochemical, clinical, multiple pregnancy and live birth rates after SET and DET were analyzed according to the morphological score of the embryos transferred. ETs were divided into 9 groups according to the combinations of their embryo morphological scores. Participants/materials, setting, methods Embryos were assessed on D3 following a national recommended morphological scale. Morphology was categorized as High (H) if A or B+, medium (M) if B or C+, and Low (L) if C or D. The likelihood of biochemical, clinical pregnancy and live birth, and the risk of multiple pregnancy, after SET and DET of embryos of different scores was analyzed. A logistic regression analysis adjusted by age of the woman was ran for each outcome. Main results and the role of chance The distribution of ETs among the 9 groups for SET was: 510 H, 715 M, 346 L; for DET: 142 HH, 148 HM, 29 HL, 268 MM, 164 ML, 148 LL. Mean woman age was similar among groups: 38.7±4.01. Live birth and twin rates increased with embryo score. Considering a SET of category M as reference, the OR of live birth in DET were: 2.76 [1.82, 4.19 95%CI] for HH, and 2.32 [1.51, 3.55 95%CI] for HM, and 1.69 [1.19, 2.40 95%CI] for MM, and in SET: 1.52 [1.12, 2.04 95%CI] for H. Considering a DET of category MM as reference, the OR of twin birth in DET were: 2.8 [1.14, 6.99 95%CI] for HH, 2.5 [0.98, 6.46 95%CI] for HM, and 0.92 [0.11, 7.84 95%CI] for HL. According to this model, a 38y.o. woman with a SET of category M would have a 16% chance of live birth, and no twins. The addition of an M (DET: MM) increases her chance of live birth to 24% with a 2.9% risk of twins. The addition of a H (DET:MH) would increase further her chance of live birth to 30.8%, however, the increase would be due almost exclusively to twins (7%). Limitations, reasons for caution The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and the small size of some categories. Embryos were classified using a national morphological scale; other morphological classifications could influence the results. The development and validation of site-specific models, using local patients’ data, is recommended before their use in clinical practice. Wider implications of the findings: A personalized assessment of embryo quality and woman age, at a minimum, are necessary to identify the best ET strategy for each patient; this strategy allows to maximize live birth rates while keeping the risk of twin birth as low as possibl. Trial registration number Not applicable


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 2442-2449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anick De Vos ◽  
Lisbet Van Landuyt ◽  
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
Michel Camus ◽  
Hilde Van de Velde ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1820-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Debrock ◽  
K. Peeraer ◽  
E. Fernandez Gallardo ◽  
D. De Neubourg ◽  
C. Spiessens ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos G. Papanikolaou ◽  
Efstratios M. Kolibianakis ◽  
Herman Tournaye ◽  
Christos A Venetis ◽  
Human Fatemi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Michael Awadalla ◽  
Nicole Vestal ◽  
Lynda McGinnis ◽  
Ali Ahmady

AbstractAccurate knowledge of the live birth rate for cleavage stage embryos is essential to determine an appropriate number of embryos to transfer at once. Results from previous studies lack details needed for practical use. This is a mathematical analysis and model building study of day 3 cleavage stage embryo transfers. A total of 996 embryos were transferred in 274 fresh and 83 frozen embryo transfers. Embryo morphology was divided into 4 groups based on number of cells and fragmentation percentage. Each embryo transfer was modeled as an equation equating the sum of the live birth rates of the transferred embryos to the number of live births that resulted. The least squares solution to the system of embryo transfer equations was determined using linear algebra. This analysis was repeated for ages 35 to 42 years old at oocyte retrieval. The best fit live birth rates per embryo in the age group centered on 35 years old were 29%, 13%, 10%, and 9% for embryos in the 8-cell with ≤ 5% fragmentation, 8-cell with > 5% fragmentation, 9–12 cell, and 6–7 cell groups, respectively. Cleavage stage embryos with fewer than 6 cells on day 3 had very low best fit live birth rates close to 0% at age 39 years and were excluded from the primary analysis to prevent overfitting. These live birth rates can be used with a simple embryo transfer model to predict rates of single and multiple gestation prior to a planned cleavage stage embryo transfer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document