scholarly journals Non-invasive first-trimester aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA in a fertility practice: acceptability and outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e20
Author(s):  
K.R. Hammond ◽  
N.A. Cataldo ◽  
B.A. Malizia ◽  
J.A. Hubbard ◽  
M.P. Steinkampf
In Vivo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 3449-3457
Author(s):  
AFRODITE SIALAKOUMA ◽  
IOANNIS KARAKASILIOTIS ◽  
VAIA NTALA ◽  
NIKOLAOS NIKOLETTOS ◽  
BYRON ASIMAKOPOULOS

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3428
Author(s):  
Emily Colley ◽  
Adam J. Devall ◽  
Helen Williams ◽  
Susan Hamilton ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
...  

Approximately one in four pregnancies result in pregnancy loss, and ~50% of these miscarriages are caused by chromosomal abnormalities. Genetic investigations are recommended after three consecutive miscarriages on products of conception (POC) tissue. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been utilised for prenatal screening, but very little work has been carried out in nonviable pregnancies. We investigated the use of cfDNA from maternal blood to identify chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage. One hundred and two blood samples from women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage were collected and stored. The mean gestational age was 7.1 weeks (range: 5–11 weeks). In this research, samples without a genetic test result from POC were not analysed. CfDNA was extracted and analysed using a modified commercial genome-wide non-invasive prenatal test. No results were provided to the patient. In 57 samples, cytogenetic results from POC analysis were available. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 47% (27/57) of POC analyses, and cfDNA analysis correctly identified 59% (16/27) of these. In total, 75% (43/57) of results were correctly identified. The average cfDNA fetal fraction was 6% (2–19%). In conclusion, cfDNA can be used to detect chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages where the ‘fetal fraction’ is high enough; however, more studies are required to identify variables that can affect the overall results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. S583
Author(s):  
Lydia L. Shook ◽  
Mark A. Clapp ◽  
Penelope A. Roberts ◽  
Sarah N. Bernstein ◽  
Ilona T. Goldfarb

Author(s):  
Ismail Tekesin

Abstract Introduction Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is increasingly used as a screening method not only for trisomy (T) 21 but also for T18 and T13, sex chromosome anomalies (SCA) and microdeletions. Based on cases with a positive cfDNA result in our specialised prenatal practice, this study aims to characterise the usage of cfDNA testing and to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) in routine practice in Germany. Patients and Methods In this retrospective study we analysed the data of all pregnant women with a positive cfDNA result seen between 09/2013 and 12/2019. Women were either referred due to the positive result or the test was initiated in our practice. The primary parameter of interest was the concordance of cfDNA tests with confirmatory genetic testing. Results We encountered 81 cases with a positive cfDNA test (T21: 49.4%; T18: 9.9%; T13: 8.6%; SCA: 22.2%; 22q12del: 8.6%). The PPV was 95.0% for T21, but considerably lower for T18 (55.6%) and T13 (28.6%). For SCAs it was 23.1% and no case with DiGeorge syndrome was confirmed. 63% of the patients had not received a fetal anomaly scan before cfDNA testing. In first-trimester fetuses with a cfDNA test predicting an autosomal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies were detected in 90.3% of the cases. No false positive case had an abnormal US result. Conclusions Despite the excellent specificity of cfDNA tests, the PPV for aneuploidies other than T21 is low in routine practice. In discordance with the current guidelines, cfDNA test is often used without a previous detailed anomaly scan. Our data provide valuable information to assist patient counselling and shared decision making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document