REALISTIC MEASUREMENT OF THE EFFECT OF SPERM DNA FRAGMENTATION ON REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES BY CUMULATIVE LIVEBIRTH RATES (CLBR) PER EMBRYO REPLACED AND OOCYTE EMPLOYED REVEALS ITS LACK OF RELEVANCE IN UNSELECTED MALES USING OWN OOCYTES

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e114
Author(s):  
Irene Hervas ◽  
Nicolas Garrido ◽  
Rocio Rivera-Egea ◽  
Cristina Gonzalez-Ravina ◽  
David Amoros ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K C Mantravadi ◽  
D R Gedela

Abstract Study question In Individuals with raised Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (SDF), will sperm selection by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) or surgical retrieval of testicular sperms (TESA) optimize the reproductive outcomes? Summary answer Couples with failed implantation raised SDF, TESA /MACS offer similar results. This RCT doesn’t prove superiority or added benefit with any of the above interventions. What is known already It is evident that raised SDF negatively affects the reproductive outcomes. Management for raised SDF to optimize reproductive outcomes is still elusive. Study design, size, duration This was a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with prior approval from institutional Ethical Committee and trial registration. Couples undergoing stimulation with raised SDF were randomized to MACS (n = 75) and TESA (n = 75) for sperm selection between April2019 & February2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Couples with history of one failed IVF had SDF testing and SDF>30% were recruited. SDF test done with SCSA method and randomized using software. ICSI was the method of insemination. Extended embryo culture till blastocyst was done and freeze all policy was opted. Two Blastocysts that showed 100% survival were transferred in a Frozen Embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Embryonic and Reproductive outcomes were compared between both groups. Live birth and Miscarriage were the primary outcomes. Main results and the role of chance Reproductive Outcomes of MACS Vs TESA were: Average Blastocyst conversion - 32% Vs 39% (RR 1.22, CI1.00 to 1.50) Implantation rate (IR) - 50% Vs 35% (RR - 0.71, CI 0.51 to 0.98) Miscarriage rate (MR) - 5.3% Vs 11% (RR1.6333, CI 0.5227 to 5.1039) Multiple Pregnancy rate (MPR) - 8% Vs 4% Live birth Rate (LBR) per Intention to treat (ITT) - 41.3% Vs 44% (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.26) LBR per ET cycle - 63% Vs 56% (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.94) Our preliminary results suggest that despite greater availability of blastocysts for transfer in the TESA group, no difference in ART outcomes was observed between the groups. Though the IR was statistically low with TESA, our primary outcomes LBR and MR were comparable. TESA or MACS seem to offer similar outcomes. Considering the invasiveness with TESA, MACS can be offered for better sperm selection for couples with raised sperm DFI & failed implantation. Limitations, reasons for caution Small sample size. TESA is a surgical intervention Wider implications of the findings Optimal intervention for management of SDF still needs further research. Trial registration number CTRI/2019/07/020140


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3976
Author(s):  
Alberto Pacheco ◽  
Arancha Blanco ◽  
Fernando Bronet ◽  
María Cruz ◽  
Jaime García-Fernández ◽  
...  

Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) can be used to separate apoptotic sperm with high proportions of fragmented DNA from the rest, thus improving the overall quality of the seminal sample. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficiency of the MACS technique to increase reproductive outcomes in patients with high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm-injection (ICSI) cycles. In this study, we analyzed a total of 724 assisted-reproduction-technique (ART) cycles that were divided into two groups: the study group (n = 366) in which the MACS selection technique was performed after density-gradient centrifugation (DGC), and the control group (n = 358) in which only DGC was used for sperm selection. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed in both groups according to three different ART procedures: preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and autologous and oocyte-donation cycles. The MACS group showed significantly lower miscarriage rates in autologous ICSI cycles, higher pregnancy rates in oocyte-donation cycles, and a significant increase in live-birth rates in both autologous and oocyte-donation cycles. Overall, these results suggested that the MACS technique can be effectively used to eliminate sperm with high SDF levels, and therefore may help to improve reproductive outcomes in couples undergoing ART.


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. S71
Author(s):  
M. Brassesco ◽  
R. Lafuente ◽  
G. López ◽  
M.A. Checa ◽  
R. Carreras

Author(s):  
Serafín Perez-Cerezales ◽  
Priscila Ramos-Ibeas ◽  
Eva Pericuesta Camacho ◽  
Raul Fernández-González ◽  
Angela Patricia López-Cardona ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Arafa ◽  
H Elbardisi ◽  
S AlSaid ◽  
H Burjaq ◽  
T AlMazooqi ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does the sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) level impact the clinical outcome of couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)? Summary answer No significant effect was observed for SDF on the reproductive outcome of couples undergoing ICSI. What is known already Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF) has emerged as an important biomarker in the assessment of male fertility potential. It is currently being used as one of the advanced sperm function tests along with other conventional methods in male fertility evaluation. The impact of SDF on the reproductive outcomes of ICSI remains to be controversial. Evidence extracted from three meta-analyses have indicated that higher SDF is not associated with a negative impact on ICSI outcomes. On the contrary, another meta-analysis revealed that SDF can have a significant impact on the pregnancy rate of ICSI with an OR of 1.31. Study design, size, duration This is a retrospective cohort study carried out in the assisted conception unit of a tertiary medical center. The study duration was over a 5-year period from August 1st, 2014 to August 1st, 2019. The charts of 1922 patients who underwent ICSI were screened for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent ICSI using ejaculate spermatozoa and had a recorded SDF test done within a week before ICSI (n = 390). Participants/materials, setting, methods Sperm chromatin dispersion was used to evaluate SDF utilizing the Halosperm G2 test kit (Halotech, Madrid, Spain). All patients performed the ICSI trial using ejaculated spermatozoa. Patients were divided according to the SDF level into 3 groups; SDF <20% (n = 148), SDF 20–30% (n = 133), and SDF >30% (n = 109). Female partner fertility status was recorded and couples were grouped into 2 groups based on age and AMH levels; (1) favorable female and (2) unfavorable female status. Main results and the role of chance Overall, clinical pregnancy occurred in 45% of cases, live birth rate was 33.60%, and 1.30% of patients had miscarriage. A significant negative correlation between SDF and sperm count (r–0.232), motility (r–0.469), progressive motility (r–0.312) and normal morphology (r–0.297) was detected (p < 0.001 for all). Fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were greater in patients with lower SDF than those with higher SDF in both favorable and unfavorable groups, however the difference was not statistically significant (Table 1). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of our study was the retrospective nature of the study where some data may be missing or incomplete. The data was also retrieved from one ART center, therefore our data lacked diversity within methodologies for IVF and SDF testing. Wider implications of the findings: SDF was found to be significantly correlated with conventional semen parameters highlighting its significance as a robust diagnostic test during male fertility evaluation. In this study, while patients with higher SDF values had worse reproductive outcomes with ICSI, the results did not reach statistical significance. Trial registration number NA


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document