scholarly journals PREDICTIVE CUMULATIVE LIVE-BIRTH RATE BASED ON FACTOR OF SURVIVAL RATE FOR SUBSEQUENT CYCLE IN UNDISTURBED EMBRYO CULTURE IN TIME-LAPSE INCUBATOR, DOES POOLING EFFECT THE LIVE BIRTH RATE IN TIME-LAPSE INCUBATOR?

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e140
Author(s):  
Akhil Garg ◽  
María de los Ángeles Valera ◽  
Lorena Bori ◽  
Thamara Viloria ◽  
Ma José de los Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Embryo Culture ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Subsequent Cycle

scholarly journals Embryo incubation and assessment by time-lapse system versus conventional incubators in Chinese women with diminished ovarian re serve undergoing IVF/ICSI : a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaoxin Chen ◽  
Yuanyuan Wu ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Wentao Li ◽  
Chunyan Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Embryo Culture ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

Abstract Background: Time-lapse imaging system (TLS) is a newly developed non-invasive embryo assessment system. Compared with conventional incubators, it provides stable culture condition and consistent observation of embryo development, thereby improving embryo quality and selection. In theory, these benefits could improve clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Although this system has been routinely used in many IVF centers globally, it remains unclear if the TLS results in higher cumulative live birth rate and high-quality evidence is warranted. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the TLS with conventional incubators in infertile diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) patients. Methods: This study is a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial (1:1 treatment ratio of TLS vs. conventional incubator). A total of 730 DOR patients undergoing the first or second cycle of IVF or ICSI will be enrolled and randomized into two parallel groups. Participants in group A will undergo embryo culture and selection in the TLS, and participants in group B will undergo embryo culture in the conventional incubators and embryo selection by the morphological characteristics. The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth rate of the trial IVF/ICSI cycle within 12 months after randomization. This study is powered to detect an absolute difference of 10% (35% vs 25%) at the significance level of 0.05 and 80% statistical power based on a two-sided test. Discussion: The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of time-lapse system compared with conventional incubators in patients with DOR undergoing IVF/ICSI. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900027746. Registered on 24 Nov 2019.

scholarly journals Impact of time-lapse imaging incubators with single-step culture medium on cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Mascarenhas ◽  
Sarah J Owen ◽  
Emily French ◽  
Karen Thompson ◽  
Adam H Balen
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Culture Medium ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Time Lapse Imaging

Objective To compare the cumulative live birth rate per egg retrieval between time lapse imaging (TLI) incubators and standard culture (SC) incubators both using a single-step culture medium Design Retrospective cohort study Setting A tertiary level fertility-centre Population Women undergoing an IVF cycle between November 2015 and December 2017 Methods Comparison was done between 1219 IVF cycles using TLI and 1039 cycles using SC after accounting for confounding factors such as age and number of oocytes retrieved. Main outcome measure Cumulative live birth rate per egg retrieval Results The live birth rate per egg retrieval following fresh embryo transfer was noted to be higher for TLI cycles (TLI 39.87% vs SC 38.02%, aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.44). More embryos were available for cryopreservation in the TLI arm (MD 0.08 embryos, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.41). The live birth rate per frozen embryo transfer was not significantly different. The cumulative live birth rate per egg retrieval was significantly higher in the TLI arm (TLI 50.29% vs SC 46.78%, aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.48) Conclusions With the use of single step medium, there appears to be a greater benefit of TLI through a reduced interruption in embryo culture conditions, resulting in a higher number of embryos available for cryostorage which in turn appears to improve the cumulative live birth rate. Funding No funding was obtained for this study Keywords Time lapse imaging, cumulative live birth rate, single step culture medium, embryo utilization rate

scholarly journals Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e042395
Author(s):  
Simone Cornelisse ◽  
Liliana Ramos ◽  
Brigitte Arends ◽  
Janneke J Brink-van der Vlugt ◽  
Jan Peter de Bruin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Superiority Trial

IntroductionIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited.Methods and analysisWe have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Register (NL 6857).

scholarly journals Cumulative live birth rate after up to three consecutive embryo transfer cycles in women with poor ovarian response

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
Se Jeong Kim ◽  
Dayong Lee ◽  
Seul Ki Kim ◽  
Byung Chul Jee ◽  
Seok Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Ovarian Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Poor Ovarian Response ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

Objective: In the present study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (LBR) after up to three consecutive embryo transfer (ET) cycles, either fresh or frozen, in women with expected poor ovarian response (ePOR). Methods: We selected 115 women who entered the first <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) cycle between August 2013 and July 2016. The women were divided into an ePOR group (37 women) and a non-ePOR group (78 women). All women in the ePOR group were ≥40 years old or had serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels of less than 1.1 ng/mL at the time of the first IVF cycle. Live birth outcomes were monitored until December 2017. The cumulative LBR (with both conservative and optimistic estimates) was calculated according to the serial number of ET cycles. Results: After up to three ET cycles, the overall cumulative LBR was significantly lower in the ePOR group than in the non-ePOR group (conservative estimate, 10.8% vs. 44.9%, respectively; optimistic estimate, 14.7% vs. 56.1%, respectively; log-rank test, <i>p</i>=0.003). Conclusion: Women with ePOR exhibited a lower cumulative LBR than women in the non-ePOR group, and this information should be provided to ePOR women during counseling before starting IVF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document