scholarly journals ASSISTED HATCHING MAY IMPAIR THE OUTCOMES OF SINGLE FROZEN BLASTOCYST TRANSFER IN GOOD PROGNOSIS PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e178
Author(s):  
Cuc Thi Thu Bach ◽  
Trung Van Phung ◽  
Luyen Thi Dinh
2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1105-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela P. A. F. Braga ◽  
Amanda S. Setti ◽  
Rita C. S. Figueira ◽  
Assumpto Iaconelli ◽  
Edson Borges

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley S. Hurst ◽  
Kathleen E. Tucker ◽  
Caleb A. Awoniyi ◽  
William D. Schlaff

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CMRH.S7735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif F. Hendawy ◽  
TA Raafat

Background Extended in vitro embryo culture and blastocyst transfer have emerged as essential components of the advanced reproductive technology armamentarium, permitting selection of more advanced embryos considered best suited for transfer. Aim of study The aim of this study was to compare between cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and to assess the role of assisted hatching technique in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer. Patients and methods This study was carried out on two groups. Group I: 110 patients who underwent 120 cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with day 2-3 embryo transfer—for unexplained infertility or male factor within the previous 3 years. Their data obtained retrospectively from medical records. Group II: 46 age matched infertile female patients undergoing 51 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for similar causes. Patients in Group II were further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups; Group Ila (23 patients), which had laser assisted hatching and Group IIb (23 patients), which did not have assisted hatching. All patients had an infertility workup including basal hormonal profile, pelvic ultrasound, hysterosalpingogram and/or laparoscope and semen analysis of the patient's partner. All patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Using long protocol of ovulation induction. Laser assisted hatching was done for blastocysts of 23 patients. Results Comparison between both groups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in group II ( P < 0.05) Comparison between both subgroups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a highly significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in Group IIa ( P < 0.01). There was also a significantly higher rate of multiple pregnancies among Group IIa ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Blastocyst transfer is a successful and improved alternative for patients with multiple failed in vitro fertilization attempts, associated with a significant increase in pregnancy and implantation rates. Furthermore, laser assisted hatching increases implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Hiraoka ◽  
Kaori Hiraoka ◽  
Masayuki Kinutani ◽  
Kazuo Kinutani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document