Nutrition and diet quality of food at home by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) status

Food Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 102165
Author(s):  
Bhagyashree Katare ◽  
James K. Binkley ◽  
Kaiyan Chen
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0240263
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Biing‐Hwan Lin ◽  
Lisa Mancino ◽  
Michele Ver Ploeg ◽  
Chen Zhen

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides millions of low-income Americans food benefits and other forms of nutrition assistance. Evidence indicates that SNAP reduces food insecurity. However, there is a concern that the food benefit may increase the demand for less healthy foods more than healthier foods, thereby reducing the overall nutritional quality of the participant’s food basket. This paper aims to examine the association of SNAP participation with the nutritional quality of food-at-home purchases of low-income households and to investigate the potential heterogeneity among consumers with different levels of nutrition attitude. This analysis used food purchase data from the USDA National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS). Our study sample included 2,218 low-income households, of which 1,184 are SNAP participants, and 1,034 are income-eligible nonparticipants. Multivariate regressions were performed to explore the SNAP-nutritional quality association. A household’s nutrition attitude was measured using its response to a question on whether the household searched for nutrition information online in the last 2 months. Households that affirmed they had an online nutrition search were treated as nutrition-oriented households (21.2% of the low-income sample), and households that did not were considered less nutrition-oriented households (78.8%). For robustness, we also created an alternative nutrition attitude measure based on reported use of the nutrition facts label. We found that among less nutrition-oriented households, SNAP participants had a statistically significant 0.097 points (p = 0.018) lower Guiding Stars rating than low-income nonparticipants. However, there was no significant SNAP-nutritional quality association among nutrition-oriented households. In conclusion, SNAP participation was associated with lower nutritional quality of food purchases among less nutrition-oriented households, but not among nutrition-oriented households. The results suggest that the intended nutritional benefits of restrictions on purchases of healthy foods may not reach the subgroup of nutrition-oriented SNAP participants.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Victoria M. Pak ◽  
Erin Ferranti ◽  
Ingrid Duva ◽  
Melissa Owen ◽  
Sandra B. Dunbar

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides access to healthy food for low-income individuals and households. Food security, however, does not necessarily achieve higher diet quality for beneficiaries. Diet quality is an important consideration for the development and management of chronic illness, a significant public health concern. In this study, we review incentives and disincentives implemented to improve the diet quality, the evidence on SNAP including benefits, challenges, and the politics of funding. New interventions and policies will be needed in order to improve the overall diet quality of SNAP households. SNAP should align with nutritional science to meet national public health goals. Nurses are trusted advocates for patients and the public and are uniquely positioned to aid in this effort. Informed by evidence, nurses willing to leverage their influence, can lead this needed change.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangfang Zhang ◽  
Junxiu Liu ◽  
Colin D Rehm ◽  
Parke Wilde ◽  
Jerold R Mande ◽  
...  

Introduction: Unhealthful diet is one of the top contributors to the chronic disease burden in the U.S. There are growing concerns that socioeconomic disparities exist in Americans’ diets and this disparity may have widened over time. Aim: To characterize trends in dietary intake of key food groups and nutrients among low-income Americans who participated in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and assess whether disparities in U.S. diets have persisted, improved, or worsened over time. Methods: Nationally representative sample of 6,162 adults aged 20 years or older who participated in SNAP, 6,692 income-eligible nonparticipants, and 25,842 higher-income nonparticipants from 8 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles (1999-2014). Exposures are calendar year and SNAP participation status. Survey-weighted, energy-adjusted mean scores and proportion meeting the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 Strategic Impact Diet Goals (5 primary components: fruits/vegetables, whole grains, fish/shellfish, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), sodium; 3 secondary components: nuts/seeds/legumes, processed meats, saturated fat). Intakes of individual food groups and nutrients were also assessed. Results: From 2003-2004 to 2013-2014 among SNAP participants with data on two-day dietary recall, primary diet score (maximum of 50) modestly increased (15.6 to 16.6; P-trend =0.03) while the secondary diet score (maximum of 80 points) did not change (31.5 to 32.1; P-trend =0.11). The proportion of SNAP participants having a poor diet decreased from 74.3% to 68.6%, the proportion having an intermediate-quality diet increased from 25.5% to 31.2%, and the proportion of having an ideal diet remained unchanged (0.2%.). Among primary components, changes were strongest for SSBs (-0.43 servings/d, P-trend=0.001) and whole grains (+0.25 servings/d, P-trend<0.001). Compared to higher-income nonparticipants and income-eligible nonparticipants, SNAP participants had weaker improvements in both primary and secondary diet scores. From 1999-2000 to 2013-2014, disparities persisted for most dietary components, worsened for nuts/seeds and added sugars, and weakened for sodium. Conclusion: Despite some improvements in diet quality, SNAP participants still fall far short of meeting the AHA Goals for a healthful diet, and dietary disparities persisted or worsened for most dietary components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document