Risk preferences, risk perceptions and timber harvest decisions — An empirical study of nonindustrial private forest owners in northern Sweden

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Andersson ◽  
Peichen Gong
1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Ellen Force ◽  
Harry W. Lee

Abstract Idaho's nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owners were surveyed by mail to determine their sociodemographic characteristics, perceptions of the benefits received from owning forestland, use of forest management practices, harvesting plans, and use of forest management assistance. Data were reported for the entire state and also analyzed by ownership class. The sociodemographic profile of Idaho's NIPF owner is similar to that reported from other states. Major benefits of owning NIPF land were: wood for domestic use; esthetic enjoyment; and wildlife appreciation. Esthetics were more important to smaller landowners. Grazing and timber were benefits of importance to large landowners. Fifty-six percent of owners have harvested timber, varying from 35% of small holdings to 74% of large holdings. One-fourth of the owners say they will never harvest timber. Only 34% have ever sought professional forest management assistance. West. J. Appl. For. 6(2):32-36.


Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1368
Author(s):  
Altamash Bashir ◽  
Hanne K. Sjølie ◽  
Birger Solberg

We have found some errors in our recently published article [...]


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Tikina ◽  
Robert Kozak ◽  
Gary Bull ◽  
Bruce Larson

Abstract A mail survey of certified and noncertified forest managing entities (public agencies, forest industry, and nonindustrial private forest owners) in the US Pacific Northwest region (PNW) was conducted to better understand forest practitioners' perceptions related to the degree of change in forest practices. The results of this study reveal that forest managers perceive relatively small changes in practices in the US PNW, regardless of the certification standard used, although the degrees of change differed for public, forest industry, and nonindustrial private forest owners. This conclusion applies to both certified and noncertified holdings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document