Does digitalization affect the objective and subjective wellbeing of forestry farm households? Empirical evidence in Fujian Province of China

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 102236
Author(s):  
Yan-Zhen Hong ◽  
Hung-Hao Chang
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Mittenzwei ◽  
Stefan Mann

Purpose Outside farming, pluriactivity is generally considered as undesirable, whereas agricultural economists tend to recommend part-time farming. This contradiction is to be solved. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Linking tax-payer and statistical farm-level data from Norway, the authors tested how profitable part-time farming is for Norwegian farm households. Findings The analysis showed that concentrating on either working on-farm or off-farm generates a higher household income than combining the two. Practical implications Part-time farming may be a lifestyle decision, but apparently is not economically optimal for most farms. Originality/value The contribution solves an apparent contradiction between the discourses inside and outside agriculture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1092
Author(s):  
Radosław Pastusiak ◽  
Michał Soliwoda ◽  
Magdalena Jasiniak ◽  
Joanna Stawska ◽  
Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko

The topic of farms that deal with environmental constraints is an ongoing agricultural policy issue, including within the Common Agricultural Policy. We propose empirical evidence based on a sample of Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) farm households, evaluate the influence of chosen factors on financially sustainable farm development and verify less-favoured area (LFA) farms’ growth compared with non-LFA households. To specify farm households, we use the Sustainable Growth Challenge (SGC) model and DuPont decomposition based on financial measures and indicators that were adopted from corporate finance. It is concluded that the differences in SGC and revenue growth values between LFA and non-LFA farms mainly results from the system of subsidising LFA farms that receive compensation for farming in areas with adverse environmental conditions. Generally, the impact of agricultural policies on LFA and non-LFA farms is significant and may weaken the effect on LFA. With the exception of education, other sociodemographic factors do not highly influence farm efficiency. Along with improvements in the quality of human capital (e.g., higher education level), awareness of subsidies, and debt and innovative solutions increases. The interest in precision agriculture and agriculture 4.0 is also growing, which directly translates into better technological and financial efficiency of farms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2331-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radosław Pastusiak ◽  
Magdalena Jasiniak ◽  
Michał Soliwoda ◽  
Joanna Stawska

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document