An improved AlexNet model for automated skeletal maturity assessment using hand X-ray images

Author(s):  
Ming He ◽  
Xudong Zhao ◽  
Yu Lu ◽  
Yi Hu
2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Madhu ◽  
Amitha Hegde ◽  
A. Munshi

Assessment of skeletal maturity is an integral part of interceptive diagnosis and treatment planning. The present day methods of skeletal maturity assessment like the hand-wrist radiographs or cervical vertebrae radiographs are expensive, require elaborate equipment and accounts for high radiation exposure, especially for growing children. The present study was thus undertaken to provide a simple and practical method of skeletal maturity assessment using the developmental stages of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3) as seen on an IOPA film taken using a standard dental x-ray machine. The results of the study showed that this simple method was highly reliable and could be used as an alternative method to assess the skeletal maturity of growing children.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Fernando Cordeiro Castro ◽  
Edna Lúcia Flôres ◽  
Gilberto Arantes Carrijo ◽  
Antônio Cláudio Paschoarelli Veiga ◽  
Milena Pereira Bueno Carneiro

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Santosh C. Verghese ◽  
J. M. Jayraj ◽  
U.S. Krishna Nayak

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby G. Cockill ◽  
Amanda Hewitt ◽  
Christopher Heafey ◽  
Neil P. Wright ◽  
Charlotte J. Elder

AbstractBackground:Left hand and wrist X-rays are conventionally used to assess skeletal maturity using methods such as Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3). We noted a number were poor quality, caused by difficulty with hand placement. We introduced a simple radiolucent hand template to assist in hand positioning and assessed changes in X-ray quality and repeat X-ray rates.Methods:The position of fingers, thumb and overall clarity of bone age X-rays were prospectively scored. In the absence of a validated tool to assess quality a 1–3 scale (poor, borderline, good) was devised. A radiolucent hand template was introduced for use in the intervention group. Need for repeat X-ray was determined by set criteria.Results:The intervention improved scores. More patients scored 3 (good) for positioning of fingers (89.29% and 85.33%, p=0.38), thumb (98.21% and 89.96%, p=0.06) and overall clarity (76.79% and 70.27%, p=0.41) for the intervention (n=56) and control groups (n=259), respectively. No patient required repeat X-ray from the intervention group, compared with 28 in the control group (p=0.007).Conclusions:Achieving good quality bone age X-rays is more difficult than previously assumed. The use of a radiolucent hand template has been shown to improve hand position and significantly reduce the need for repeat X-ray.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. M. Lau ◽  
A. L. H. Hung ◽  
W. W. Chau ◽  
Z. Hu ◽  
A. Kumar ◽  
...  

Purpose The EOS-imaging system is increasingly adopted for clinical follow-up in scoliosis with the advantages of simultaneous biplanar imaging of the spine in an erect position. Skeletal maturity assessment using a hand radiograph is an essential adjunct to spinal radiography in scoliosis follow-up. This study aims at testing the feasibility and validity of a newly proposed EOS workflow with sequential spine-hand radiography for skeletal maturity assessment and bracing recommendation. Methods EOS spine-hand radiographs from patients with diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis, including both sexes and an age range of ten to 14 years, were scored using the Thumb Ossification Composite Index (TOCI), Sanders and Risser methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for inter/intraobserver agreement and were tested with Cronbach’s alpha values. Results In all, 60 EOS-spine hand radiographs selected from subjects with diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), including 32 male patients (mean age 11.53 years; 10 to 14) and 28 female patients (mean age 11.50 years; 10 to 13) who underwent sequential spine-hand low dose EOS imaging were generated for analysis. The overall interobserver (ICC = 0.997) and intraobserver agreement (α > 0.9) demonstrated excellent agreement for TOCI staging; ICC > 0.994 for both TOCI and Sanders staging comparing traditional digital versus EOS hand radiography; ICC ≥ 0.841 for agreement on bracing recommendation among TOCI versus the Risser and Sanders system. Conclusion With the proposed new EOS workflow it was feasible to produce high image quality for skeletal maturity assessment with excellent reliability and validity to inform consistent bracing recommendation in AIS. The workflow is applicable for busy daily clinic settings in tertiary scoliosis centres with reduced time cost, improved efficiency and throughput of the radiology department. Level of evidence III


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzi W. Nahhas ◽  
Richard J. Sherwood ◽  
Wm. Cameron Chumlea ◽  
Dana L. Duren

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0138493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Mansourvar ◽  
Shahaboddin Shamshirband ◽  
Ram Gopal Raj ◽  
Roshan Gunalan ◽  
Iman Mazinani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document