Perennial grain cropping enhances the soil methane sink in temperate agroecosystems

Geoderma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 388 ◽  
pp. 114931
Author(s):  
Keunbae Kim ◽  
Erin J. Daly ◽  
Guillermo Hernandez-Ramirez
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Dzyuba ◽  
A. V. Eliseev ◽  
I. I. Mokhov
Keyword(s):  

Crop Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 2241-2260
Author(s):  
Sean R. Asselin ◽  
Anita L. Brûlé-Babel ◽  
Douglas J. Cattani

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.R. DeHaan ◽  
D.L. Van Tassel ◽  
T.S. Cox

AbstractPerennial grain crops would address many agricultural problems, including soil erosion, nutrient loss and pesticide contamination. Doubts about the possibility of perennial grain crops rest upon two assumptions: (1) that the relationship between yield and longevity is a fixed function that cannot be influenced by selection, mutation or environmental changes; and (2) that yield and longevity trade off in a bivariate manner to the exclusion of all other traits. These assumptions are consistent with the phenotypic trade-off model, but recent research suggests that a quantitative genetic model is a more appropriate approach to trade-offs. In the quantitative genetic model, environmental and genetic changes can result in increases in two traits simultaneously even when a trade-off, or negative correlation, exists between the two traits. Empirical evidence that the trade-off between perenniality and reproductive allocation is not fixed comes from wild, herbaceous perennials that can produce more than 2000 kg seed ha−1 in the temperate zone, and herbaceous perennial crops that produce on average 8900 kg fruit ha−1 in the tropics. Ecological literature suggests that most perennials produce small amounts of seed relative to their vegetative growth not as a physiological absolute, but rather as a result of natural selection in a stable, competitive environment favoring longevity. By selecting strongly for seed yield in a population of perennial plants, the plant breeder can likely achieve that which is rare in nature—a high seed-yielding perennial plant. The same general methodologies that have allowed annual grain breeders to increase grain yield and push many combinations of negatively correlated traits to levels of expression not seen in nature are available to the perennial grain breeder. Perennial grain breeders are integrating ecological principles and traditional plant breeding methods in their efforts to develop perennial grain wheat (Triticum spp.), sorghum (Sorghum spp.), sunflower (Helianthus spp.), Illinois bundleflower (Desmanthus illinoensis) and rice (Oryza spp.).


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2818-2833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Blanc-Betes ◽  
Jeffrey M. Welker ◽  
Neil C. Sturchio ◽  
Jeffrey P. Chanton ◽  
Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Crews ◽  
Douglas Cattani
Keyword(s):  

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 362 ◽  
pp. 114092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne L. Chai ◽  
Guillermo Hernandez-Ramirez ◽  
David S. Hik ◽  
Isabel C. Barrio ◽  
Carol M. Frost ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Lanker ◽  
Michael Bell ◽  
Valentin D. Picasso

AbstractKernza® intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) is a novel perennial grain and forage crop with the potential to provide multiple ecosystem services, which recently became commercially available to farmers in the USA. The viability and further expansion of this promising crop require understanding how it may fit the needs of farmers’ livelihoods and the structure of their farming systems. However, no prior research has studied the perceptions and experiences of Kernza growers. The goals of this research were to understand why farmers grow Kernza, how Kernza fits into their systems and identify challenges for future research. We conducted in-depth interviews with ten growers in the North Central USA during the summer of 2017, who accounted for a third of the Kernza farmers in the USA at the time. All farmers had a positive attitude toward experimentation and trying new practices, and they were interested in Kernza for its simultaneous ecological and economic benefits. Kernza was marginal in terms of area, quality of fields and resources allocated in the farm systems, which also meant that farmers maintained low costs and risks. Growers utilized and valued Kernza as a dual-use crop (grain and forage), sometimes not harvesting grain but almost always grazing or harvesting hay and straw for bedding. Weeds were perceived as a challenge in some cases, but Kernza was valued as a highly weed-suppressive crop in others. Farmers requested information on optimal establishment practices, assessment of forage nutritive value, how to maintain grain yields over years, weed management, markets and economic assessment of Kernza systems. These results agree with other cases on sustainable practices adoption showing that engaging farmers in the research process from the beginning, identifying knowledge gaps and testing management alternatives are critical for the success and expansion of novel agricultural technologies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 107573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine D. Sprunger ◽  
Steven W. Culman ◽  
Ariane L. Peralta ◽  
S. Tianna DuPont ◽  
Jay T. Lennon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document