Incidental Colorectal Findings of PET/CT Scan in Patients with Malignancies Other Than Colorectal Cancer

1581 Background: Patients considered for liver resection (LR) for hepatic metastases from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have an 18FDG-PET CT scan (PET) to exclude extrahepatic disease (EHD). The prognostic significance of an equivocal PET on overall survival (OS) for patients who proceed to LR is not entirely clear. The aim of the study is to compare OS for patients with equivocal PET prior to LR to those with a PET negative for EHD. Methods: The South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Registry collects data for mCRC patients diagnosed after February 1, 2006. Patients were included if they had LR and a PET prior to LR. PETs were coded as no EHD and possible EHD. The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to analyse the outcome of patients with an equivocal PET for EHD on OS, adjusting for possible confounders. Results: Of the 2,480 patients on the registry, 273 had had LR. Of these, 183 (67.0%) had a PET prior to LR, with 137 having no EHD and 46 having possible EHD. The no EHD and possible EHD groups were well balanced for patient, tumour and treatment characteristics – mean age: 66.7 yrs-vs-68.4 yrs, male gender: 61.3%-vs-63.0%, KRAS wildtype: 11.0%-vs-16.3%, stage IV disease at initial diagnosis: 49.6%-vs-54.3%, colonic primary: 74.4%-vs-65.2%, one LR: 82.5%-vs-89.1%, one line of chemotherapy: 52.4%-vs-48.6% and well-moderate tumour differentiation: 85.7%-vs-86.4%. The median follow-up was 32.9 months for no EHD and 33.6 months for possible EHD (P-value = 0.84). The OS for no EHD compared with possible EHD at 1-year was 98.5%-vs-93.5%, at 2-years was 87.6%-vs-88.0%, and at 5-years was 61.5%-vs-59.4%. The unadjusted hazard ratio for OS was 1.22 (95% CI 0.64–2.34, P-value = 0.54) for possible EHD. On adjustment for age, gender, stage at diagnosis, primary site, number of LRs, lines of chemotherapy and tumour differentiation, the hazard ratio remained non-significant; however lower (HR=0.76 (95% CI 0.37–1.59, P-value = 0.47)), for possible EHD. Conclusions: A PET was only performed in 67.0% of patients who had LR for mCRC. There was no difference in OS between patients with no EHD and possible EHD on PET who proceed to LR.

Download Full-text

Early PET/CT Scan Is More Effective Than RECIST in Predicting Outcome of Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab

Journal of Nuclear Medicine ◽

10.2967/jnumed.113.119909 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 54 (12) ◽

pp. 2062-2069 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

S. Lastoria ◽

M. C. Piccirillo ◽

C. Caraco ◽

G. Nasti ◽

L. Aloj ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽

Pet Ct ◽

Predicting Outcome ◽

Pet Ct Scan

Download Full-text

Prognostic Value of the Pace of Tumor Progression as Assessed by Serial 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan and Liquid Biopsy in Refractory Colorectal Cancer: The CORIOLAN Trial

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers12102752 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (10) ◽

pp. 2752

Author(s):

Silvia Camera ◽

Tugba Akin Telli ◽

Erwin Woff ◽

Caroline Vandeputte ◽

Pashalina Kehagias ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Life Expectancy ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Cancer Progression ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Pet Ct ◽

18F Fdg ◽

Fdg Pet Ct ◽

Pet Ct Scan

Introduction: Decision making in refractory colorectal cancer (rCRC) is challenging, with limited data available to predict patient outcome. We conducted a study to assess the pace of cancer progression as a potential prognostic and decision tool. Methods: CORIOLAN was a prospective, single-center, single-arm trial recruiting refractory CRC patients with an ECOG performance status of ≤1 and an estimated life expectancy of ≥12 weeks. 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 2 weeks with no cancer treatment given between these timepoints. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between pace of cancer progression as defined by changes of the whole-body metabolically active tumor volume (WB-MATV) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory objectives included evaluation of the prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Results: 47 eligible patients who had received a median number of 5 (range 2–8) prior treatments were enrolled. At the time of analysis, 45 deaths had occurred, with 26% of patients dying within 12 weeks. The median OS was 6.3 months (range 0.4–14.3). The median relative delta between WB-MATV at baseline and 2 weeks was +21%. Changes of WB-MATV, however, failed to predict OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.3, p = 0.383). Similarly, no association was observed between changes of any of the circulating biomarkers investigated and prognosis. By contrast, high WB-MATV (4.2 versus 9.4 months; HR 3.1, p = 0.003), high CEA (4.4 versus 7.0 months; HR 1.9, p = 0.053), high cfDNA (4.7 versus 7.0 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.015) and high CTC count (3.3 versus 7.5 months; HR 6.5, p < 0.001) at baseline were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: In this study, approximately 1 out of 4 refractory CRC patients who were judged to have a life expectancy >12 weeks actually died within 12 weeks. Baseline assessment of WB-MATV, cfDNA, CTCs and CEA, but not early change evaluation of the same, may help to refine patient prognostication and guide management decisions.

Download Full-text