scholarly journals A Sparse Approximation Based Algorithm to Detect Aortic Valve Opening from HVAD Waveforms Acquired via Monitor Snapshot

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. S92
Author(s):  
A. Dorken Gallastegi ◽  
U. Dorken Gallastegi ◽  
B. Yağmur ◽  
S. Karaca ◽  
Ü. Kahraman ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Lansac ◽  
Hou-Sen Lim ◽  
Yu Shomura ◽  
Khee Hiang Lim ◽  
Nolan T. Rice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 829-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahaa M. Fadel ◽  
Dalia Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad Al-Admawi ◽  
Valeria Pergola ◽  
Giovanni Di Salvo

2020 ◽  
pp. 039139882092702
Author(s):  
Hernan G Marcos-Abdala ◽  
Ana S Cruz-Solbes ◽  
Imad Hussain ◽  
Barry Trachtenberg ◽  
Guha Ashrith ◽  
...  

While Doppler and cuff blood pressure techniques are prevalent methods of assessing blood pressure in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, the impact of pulsatility on measurement is not well established. Retrospective chart analysis of clinical variables including pulse perception, blood pressure (Doppler and standard cuff), and aortic valve opening on echo at clinic visit were abstracted. Stable outpatients on continuous flow left ventricular assist devices support with concomitant portable echo assessment were included. Mean average difference was calculated and Pearson’s correlation performed for all those patients who had both Doppler and cuff pressure obtained. In all, 74 Heartmate-II patients with a median time from implant of 380 days were analyzed. A pulse was perceived in 82% of patients with persistent aortic valve opening on portable echo and also in 30% of those who had a persistently closed aortic valve. The mean average difference between the Doppler and systolic cuff pressure was ~13 mmHg ( r = 0.5, p = 0.004) when a pulse was present and ~11 mmHg when aortic valve was open ( r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). Pulse presence seems to reflect aortic valve opening a majority of the time but not always. In the presence of a prominent pulse or persistent aortic valve opening, the Doppler pressure seems to be more reflective of a systolic pressure than mean perfusion pressure. Hence, assessment of pulsatility needs to be incorporated into blood pressure measurement methods for patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finja Borowski ◽  
Michael Sämann ◽  
Sylvia Pfensig ◽  
Carolin Wüstenhagen ◽  
Robert Ott ◽  
...  

AbstractAn established therapy for aortic valve stenosis and insufficiency is the transcatheter aortic valve replacement. By means of numerical simulation the valve dynamics can be investigated to improve the valve prostheses performance. This study examines the influence of the hemodynamic properties on the valve dynamics utilizing fluidstructure interaction (FSI) compared with results of finiteelement analysis (FEA). FEA and FSI were conducted using a previously published aortic valve model combined with a new developed model of the aortic root. Boundary conditions for a physiological pressurization were based on measurements of ventricular and aortic pressure from in vitro hydrodynamic studies of a commercially available heart valve prosthesis using a pulse duplicator system. A linear elastic behavior was assumed for leaflet material properties and blood was specified as a homogeneous, Newtonian incompressible fluid. The type of fluid domain discretization can be described with an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation. Comparison of significant points of time and the leaflet opening area were used to investigate the valve opening behavior of both analyses. Numerical results show that total valve opening modelled by FEA is faster compared to FSI by a factor of 5. In conclusion the inertia of the fluid, which surrounds the valve leaflets, has an important influence on leaflet deformation. Therefore, fluid dynamics should not be neglected in numerical analysis of heart valve prostheses.


Author(s):  
Alex J. Barker ◽  
Craig Lanning ◽  
Robin Shandas

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are identified by a lesion of the tricuspid aortic leaflets in which only two ‘functional’ leaflets are visibly present. This lesion occurs in 0.5–2% of the population and is accompanied by a significant incidence of morbidity and mortality related to aortic valve dysfunction, aortic dilatation, aortic aneurysm, and aortic dissection. [1] The pathogenesis of the malformation has been postulated to be the result of a congenital or inflammatorily-mediated fusion of two of the three aortic leaflets. In addition, BAV is accompanied by a variety of heterogeneous complications and is considered a complex disease with many cofactors, the importance of which continue to be debated. Among these cofactors, the most commonly identified vascular manifestation is aortic dilatation. [1] There are two hypotheses for this manifestation: the first postulates the coexistence of BAV and genetically-based aortic fragility; the second proposes that BAV morphology and incomplete valve opening induces hemodynamic forces that influence structure and function at the aorta.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Solowjowa ◽  
D Zimpfer ◽  
M Mueller ◽  
H Krastev ◽  
V Falk ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Twist of the outflow graft (OG) of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular (LV) assist device (HM3) with subsequent occlusion is a rare, but life-threatening complication. Purpose We evaluated if potential implantation technique dependent mechanisms of OG twist can be predicted by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical, echocardiographic and MSCT data of 7 patients with angiographically proven and surgically corrected OG twist and of 11 consecutive patients without any type of pump obstruction. MSCT parameters were: position of inflow cannula related to anatomical LV apex (1), angulation of axis of inflow cannula related to LV axis (2), orientation of outflow channel of the pump housing related to LV axis (3), OG course (4). Echocardiographic parameters were LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and aortic valve opening. Results Mean time from implantation to twist was 563 ± 161 days. Preoperative LVEDD (64.6 ± 9.8 mm vs. 67.4 ± 10.2 mm, p = 0.563) was similar. LVEDD reduction after implantation (20% vs. 28%) and prevalence of aortic valve opening was higher in the twist group (71% vs. 45%). The MSCT measurements showed a high degree of heterogeneity in both groups: (1) differed from superior to infero-lateral; (2) varied from cranial to caudal, lateral and medial; (3) varied from antero-septal to inferior. (4) showed an incidence of non-obstructive kinking of 29% and 36%, respectively. Conclusion Marked heterogeneity of the measured MSCT parameters was observed in both groups. No specific pattern or geometric relation could be attributed to the OG twist phenomenon.


ASAIO Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egemen Tuzun ◽  
Igor D. Gregoric ◽  
Jeff L. Conger ◽  
Kenny Golden ◽  
Robert Jarvik ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document