scholarly journals Sensorineural hearing loss amplifies neural coding of envelope information in the central auditory system of chinchillas

2014 ◽  
Vol 309 ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziwei Zhong ◽  
Kenneth S. Henry ◽  
Michael G. Heinz
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 114-117
Author(s):  
Alireza Bina

There are some studies which confirmed that dysfunction in Central Nervous System(CNS) may cause a malfunction in the Peripheral Auditory system (Cochlea_ Auditory Nerve, Auditory Neuropathy), but the question is could Brain Disorder without any lesion in the Cochlea and/or Auditory nerve cause Sensorineural Hearing Loss? It means that the Audiogram shows that the patient suffers from sensorineural hearing loss but the site of the lesion is neither Sensory nor Neural while Brain may be involved in charge of this. And if the answer is yes then could we hear with our Brain and without Cochlea and /or Auditory nerve? We deal with this subject in this paper by: Otosclerosis and Meniere’s disease and The Brain Involvement. Hearing Loss following dysfunction in the Central Auditory and/or central non auditory system. Auditory Brainstem Implant in Patients who suffer from Neurofibromatosis Type two compare to Non Tumor cases, Mondini Syndrome, Michel aplasia. Possible role of Utricle and Saccule in Auditory (Hearing) System We propose a new Hypothesis that the External Ear Canal is not the only input of Auditory Signals, Sounds could transfer by our eyes and skin to the Cerebral Cortex and approach to the Cochlea (Backward Auditory input pathway of Sounds).


1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Penner

Data from two psychophysical tasks are presented. In the first, 8 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus adjusted the intensity of a continuous monaural noise to mask the tinnitus. In the second, in the presence of continuous monaural noise, the same subjects adjusted the intensity of a pulsed monaural tone to match the loudness of the tinnitus. The tone was either ipsilateral or contralateral to the noise. Although the noise level required to mask the tinnitus increased substantially, as did the level of the ipsilateral matching tone, the change in the level of the contralateral matching tone was minimal. One possible explanation of these findings is related to the functioning of the peripheral auditory system.


1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walt Jesteadt ◽  
Robert C. Bilger ◽  
David M. Green ◽  
James H. Patterson

Temporal acuity, the minimum time interval within which the auditory system can discriminate the order of auditory events, was measured for three listeners with normal hearing and for 10 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Eight of the 10 listeners with sensorineural loss showed better temporal acuity for conditions with greater loss. The remaining two listeners showed the opposite effect. The temporal acuity results are not well correlated with either speech discrimination scores or measures of recruitment. The temporal acuity results do appear to be correlated with results observed in studies of temporal integration or brief-tone audiometry. Listeners with sensorineural loss tend to have both poor temporal integration and good temporal acuity. This suggests that the two temporal measures may reflect a single time constant in the auditory system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
Junfang Xue ◽  
Xin Ma ◽  
Yunjuan Lin ◽  
Haijun Shan ◽  
Lisheng Yu

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the auditory findings in migraine, vestibular migraine (VM), and healthy controls. Methods: Twenty-eight migraine patients (56 ears), 18 VM (36 ears), and 25 healthy controls (50 ears) were included. Audiometry, speech discrimination scores, distortion product optoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and auditory brainstem response were tested. Results: The pure tone in the VM group showed higher thresholds at lower frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000 Hz) than the control group, with statistical differences observed (P250 Hz = 0.001, P500 Hz = 0.003, P1,000 Hz = 0.016, P2,000 Hz = 0.002). Compared with the healthy controls, the patients with VM had significantly lower amplitudes of DPOAE at 1 kHz (p < 0.001) and 2 kHz (p = 0.020), and the patients with migraine had lower amplitudes at 2 kHz (p = 0.042). Compared with the control group, the patients with migraine reported prolonged latency of wave V (p = 0.016) and IPL I–V (p = 0.003). The patients with VM had significant prolongation of IPL I–V (p = 0.024). Conclusion: Not only the peripheral, but also the central auditory system was involved in patients with migraine and VM. In particular, lower frequencies of the auditory system were more likely to be involved in VM. The history of migraine may be a cause of low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss.


Author(s):  
Tetiana A. Shidlovskaya ◽  
Olexander Ye. Kononov ◽  
Lyubov G. Petruk

Introduction: Registration of otoacoustic emission is the general objective method in diagnostics of receptor defeats of the auditory system, first of all the organ of Corti outer hair cells. At an acutrauma the receptive field of auditory system suffers. The purpose: to determine the possible prognostic criteria of progression of perceptual hearing disorders according to distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in servicemen who received acutrauma in real combat conditions. Material and methods: In the this work indicators for distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in servicemen who received acutrauma in the area of the joint forces operation have been investigated. We had examined 2 groups of people: 1st group – 30 persons who had shown improvement in auditory function and general condition after treatment, 2nd group – 30 persons in whom disease progression had observed, they had no positive dynamics after treatment. The investigation of otoacoustic emission (OAE) was conducted by analyzing system “Eclipse” of the “Interacoustics” Company (Denmark). Was used the generally accepted methodology. The recording has performed in the frequency band (1 - 6) kHz. Results. The complete adequate response of OAE across the entire frequency spectrum has been registered in only one patient with combat acutrauma from group 1. In most of the surveyed patients in whom the OAE was registered, a partially positive test was obtained as already mentioned. The response was considered as registered when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeded or was equal to 3 dB. The decision on a partially positive test was made when only one or more of the tested frequency bands had an adequate response. A positive response was registered in 42.6% of fighters of group 1 and 31.25% of group 2. According to our data, in patients of group 1 in 57.4% of cases the DPOAE was not registered at any of the frequencies, the same situation in patients of group 2 were in 68.75%. Thus in group 1 positive, including in part, the DPOAE was recorded at one frequency in 16.7% of cases, at twо frequencies - at 18.5%, at three frequencies - 7.4% and at four frequencies -1 . 8%. In group 2, a positive test was registered at one frequency in 16.7% of cases, at twо frequencies - 4.2% at three frequencies - 6.2%. At four frequencies, a positive test (complete response) was not registered in any patient of group 2. We analyzed at which frequencies the response was most often recorded with partially positive DPOAE results in surveyed patients. The corresponding percentages were calculated from the total number of received responses. At the same time, in patients of group 1 partial response of DPOAE have been registered more often than in group 2. In group 1, DPOAE was recorded at frequencies of 1 kHz in 52.2% of cases, 2 kHz - 34.8%, 4 kHz - 78.3%, 6 kHz - 21.7%. In persons from group 2, with a progressive course of sensorineural hearing loss, the DPOAE response was observed at frequencies of 1 kHz - 38.5%, 2 kHz - 46.1%, 4 kHz - 53.8%, 6 kHz - 23.1%. Thus, in both groups, the DPOAE response have been most often recorded at 4 kHz: (78.3%) and (53.8%), respectively. It is followed by the frequency of registration in 1 group with a frequency of 1 kHz (52.2%), and in group 2 with 2 kHz (46.1%). Thus, registration of the DPOAE will promote objectification of sensorineural hearing loss course at a combat acutrauma. Conclusions: The conducted researches have shown the importance of DPOAE definition at patients with a combat acutrauma that promotes timely and objective detection of receptor structures defeats of the auditory system at such patients. The results of DPOAE registration can be used to predict the course of sensorineural hearing loss and assess adverse factors in combat acutrauma. Complete absence of registration of DPOAE at servicemen with a combat acutrauma can serve as an objective sign of prognostically unfavorable course of sensorineural hearing loss at such patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document