scholarly journals Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Statin Use for Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis of 15 Prospective Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Qiang Wang ◽  
Guo-Rong Wu ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
Xiao-Ping Dai ◽  
Xiang-Rong Li
Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Guoqi Dong ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Hongru Zhang ◽  
Yihuang Gu

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) has been considered as a prognostic factor of cardiovascular disease. However, the prognostic value of sST2 concentration in chronic heart failure remains to be summarized. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for eligible studies up to January 1, 2020. Data extracted from articles and provided by authors were used in agreement with the PRISMA statement. The endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular mortality (CVM)/heart failure-related hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality (ACM)/heart failure-related readmission (HFR). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 11 studies with 5,121 participants were included in this analysis. Higher concentration of sST2 predicted the incidence of long-term ACM (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.04), long-term ACM/HFR (HR: 1.42, CI: 1.27–1.59), and long-term CVM/HFH (HR: 2.25, CI: 1.82–2.79), regardless of short-term ACM/HFR (HR: 2.31, CI: 0.71–7.49). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Higher sST2 concentration at baseline is associated with increasing risk of long-term ACM, ACM/HFR, and CVM/HFH and can be a tool for the prognosis of chronic heart failure.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. S108
Author(s):  
W.H.Wilson Tang ◽  
Holly Miller ◽  
Mary Partin ◽  
C.Martin Harris ◽  
James B. Young

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa ◽  
Ibadete Bytyçi ◽  
Stephan Von Haehling ◽  
Stefan Anker ◽  
Jacek Jozwiak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The role of statins in patients with heart failure (HF) of different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains unclear especially in the light of the absence of prospective data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in non-ischemic HF, and taking into account potential statins’ prosarcopenic effects. We assessed the association of statin use with clinical outcomes in patients with HF. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central until August 2018 for RCTs and prospective cohorts comparing clinical outcomes with statin vs non-statin use in patients with HF at different LVEF levels. We followed the guidelines of the 2009 PRISMA statement for reporting and applied independent extraction by multiple observers. Meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) of effects of statins on clinical outcomes used generic inverse variance method and random model effects. Clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and CV hospitalization. Results Finally we included 17 studies (n = 88,100; 2 RCTs and 15 cohorts) comparing statin vs non-statin users (mean follow-up 36 months). Compared with non-statin use, statin use was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–0.83, P < 0.0001, I2 = 63%), CV mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76–0.88, P < 0.0001, I2 = 63%), and CV hospitalization (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69–0.89, P = 0.0003, I2 = 36%). All-cause mortality was reduced on statin therapy in HF with both EF < 40% and ≥ 40% (HR: 0.77, 95% Cl: 0.68–0.86, P < 0.00001, and HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69–0.82, P < 0.00001, respectively). Similarly, CV mortality (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79–0.93, P = 0.0003, and HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77–0.90, P < 0.00001, respectively), and CV hospitalizations (HR 0.80 95% CI: 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04 and HR 0.76 95% CI: 0.61–0.93, P = 0.009, respectively) were reduced in these EF subgroups. Significant effects on all clinical outcomes were also found in cohort studies’ analyses; the effect was also larger and significant for lipophilic than hydrophilic statins. Conclusions In conclusion, statins may have a beneficial effect on CV outcomes irrespective of HF etiology and LVEF level. Lipophilic statins seem to be much more favorable for patients with heart failure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Testani ◽  
Meredith A. Brisco ◽  
W.H. Wilson Tang ◽  
Stephen E. Kimmel ◽  
Anjali Tiku-Owens ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa ◽  
Ibadete Bytyçi ◽  
Stephan Von Haehling ◽  
Stefan Anker ◽  
Jacek Jozwiak ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-400
Author(s):  
A. Ya. Kravchenko ◽  
A. V. Budnevskiy ◽  
M. S. Kuzina

The article is a review of the literature, which presents the results of experimental and clinical studies, meta-analysis data on the effects of hypothyroidism on the clinical course of heart failure, the association between hypothyroidism and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Thyroid gland dysfunction is a risk factor for development of cardiovascular diseases. From all types of thyroid gland dysfunction hypothyroidism is the most common. Increasing of thyroid-stimulating hormone level (which happens in patients with hypothyroidism) can influence the clinical course of chronic heart failure because of its extrathyroid effects - namely - influence on lipide metabolism, endothelial function of vessels and blood pressure. Apart from adverse effects of hormonal deficiency of thyroid gland on the start and progression of a chronic heart failure, the heart failure itself can make negative impact on a thyroid gland functioning, therefore pathophysiological "vicious circle" is formed. Manifest hypothyroidism is associated with an increased risk of general and cardiovascular mortality and frequency of hospitalizations of patients with a heart failure. Association between subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and heart failure is less studied. Figuring out the mechanisms of influence of thyroid gland hypofunction on systolic and diastolic function of myocardium may be important for effective treatment of heart failure and improvement of clinical outcomes.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Dauriz ◽  
Giovanni Targher ◽  
Cécile Laroche ◽  
Pier Luigi Temporelli ◽  
Roberto Ferrari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document