Minimally invasive liver surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors: influence of age on perioperative complications and mortality

Abstract Objectives Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye which was initially used for liver functional assessment. Moreover, it is of value for intraoperative visualization of liver segments and bile ducts or primary and secondary liver tumors. Especially in minimally invasive liver surgery, this is essential to enhance the precision of anatomical guided surgery and oncological quality. As early adopters of ICG implementation into laparoscopic and robotic-assisted liver surgery in Germany, we summarize the current recommendations and share our experiences. Methods Actual strategies for ICG application in minimally invasive liver surgery were evaluated and summarized during a review of the literature. Experiences in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted liver surgery with intraoperative ICG staining between 2018 and 2020 from the Magdeburg registry for minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS) were evaluated and the data were analyzed retrospectively. Results ICG can be used to identify anatomical liver segments by fluorescence angiography via direct or indirect tissue staining. Fluorescence cholangiography visualizes the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. Primary and secondary liver tumors can be identified with a sensitivity of 69–100%. For this 0.5 mg/kg body weight ICG must be applicated intravenously 2–14 days prior to surgery. Within the MD-MILS we identified 18 patients which received ICG for intraoperative tumor staining of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, peritoneal HCC metastases, adenoma, or colorectal liver metastases. The sensitivity for tumor staining was 100%. In 27.8% additional liver tumors were identified by ICG fluorescence. In 39% a false positive signal could be detected. This occurred mainly in cirrhotic livers. Conclusions ICG staining is a simple and useful tool to assess individual hepatic anatomy or to detect tumors during minimally invasive liver surgery. It may enhance surgical precision and improve oncological quality. False-positive detection rates of liver tumors can be reduced by respecting the tumor entity and liver functional impairments.

Download Full-text

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.360 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 360-360

Author(s):

Alexander V. Kirichenko ◽

David S. Parda ◽

Angela Sanguino ◽

Olivier Gayou ◽

Moses S. Raj ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Liver Transplant ◽

Local Control ◽

Liver Tumors ◽

Perioperative Complications ◽

Liver Volume ◽

Hepatic Metastases ◽

Tumor Diameter ◽

Liver Sbrt ◽

Metastatic Liver Tumors ◽

Metastatic Liver

360 Background: We report on the outcome and toxicity of liver SBRT alone or in combination with surgery for inoperable primary and metastatic liver tumors. Methods: Patients with up to four isolated hepatic metastases (sum of tumor diameters ≤ 8cm) and individual tumor diameter ≤ 9 cm received SBRT at 46.8Gy ± 3.7 in 4-6 fractions. In patients with hepatic cirrhosis, liver dose constraints were imposed exclusively on residual functional liver volume defined on SPECT during SBRT treatment planning. The primary end point was local control with at least 6 months of radiographic followup, and secondary end points were toxicity and survival. Results: Between 2007-2014, 120 lesions in 91 patients with either unresectable primary (n = 43) or metastatic liver cancer (n = 48) completed liver SBRT to 36-60 Gy delivered in 4 to 6 treatment fractions, with a mean BED of 197 Gy3 (range 108 – 300 Gy3). Median followup was 20.3 months (range 1.9 - 64.1). Fourteen patients underwent liver transplant with SBRT as a bridging therapy or for tumor downsizing. Eight patients completed hepatic resections in combination with planned SBRT for unresectable tumors. Two-year local control was 96% for hepatoma and 93.8% for metastases; it was 100% for lesions ≤ 4cm. Ten of 14 transplanted patients developed complete pathological response with median time to transplant of 5.7 months (range 1.7 – 23.3). No incidence of grade > 2 treatment toxicity was observed. There was no accelerated Child-Pugh class migration from A to B or from B to C. There were no operative or perioperative complications in patients who received SBRT prior to liver transplant or in combination with planned hepatectomy. Two-year overall survival was 82.3% (hepatoma) and 64.3% (metastases). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis we demonstrate that liver SBRT alone or in combination with surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of isolated inoperable hepatic malignancies and provides excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity.

Download Full-text

Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Liver Tumors: Usefulness of Combined Chemotherapy

Journal of the Korean Radiological Society ◽

10.3348/jkrs.2001.45.2.147 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 45 (2) ◽

pp. 147

Author(s):

Jeong Nam Heo ◽

Hyun Chul Rhim ◽

Yong Soo Kim ◽

Byung Hee Koh ◽

On Koo Cho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thermal Ablation ◽

Liver Tumors ◽

Combined Chemotherapy ◽

Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation ◽

Metastatic Liver Tumors ◽

Metastatic Liver

Download Full-text

Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mirhasan Rahimli ◽

Aristotelis Perrakis ◽

Vera Schellerer ◽

Andrew Gumbs ◽

Eric Lorenz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Abdominal Surgery ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Liver Surgery ◽

Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽

Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.

Download Full-text

Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study

Surgical Endoscopy ◽

10.1007/s00464-021-08434-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Andrea Ruzzenente ◽

◽

Andrea Ciangherotti ◽

Luca Aldrighetti ◽

Giuseppe Maria Ettorre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Liver Surgery ◽

Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽

Caudate Lobe ◽

Open Group ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Abstract Background Although isolated caudate lobe (CL) liver resection is not a contraindication for minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), feasibility and safety of the procedure are still poorly investigated. To address this gap, we evaluate data on the Italian prospective maintained database on laparoscopic liver surgery (IgoMILS) and compare outcomes between MILS and open group. Methods Perioperative data of patients with malignancies, as colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), non-colorectal liver metastases (NCRLM) and benign liver disease, were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the potential selection bias for MILS and open group. Results A total of 224 patients were included in the study, 47 and 177 patients underwent MILS and open isolated CL resection, respectively. The overall complication rate was comparable between the two groups; however, severe complication rate (Dindo–Clavien grade ≥ 3) was lower in the MILS group (0% versus 6.8%, P = ns). In-hospital mortality was 0% in both groups and mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MILS group (P = 0.01). After selection of 42 MILS and 43 open CL resections by PSM analysis, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes remained similar except for the hospital stay which was not significantly shorter in MILS group. Conclusions This multi-institutional cohort study shows that MILS CL resection is feasible and safe. The surgical procedure can be technically demanding compared to open resection, whereas good perioperative outcomes can be achieved in highly selected patients.

Download Full-text